Jump to content

OLTL: All Hail La Strasser: She’s the “Alexis of Daytime” — Again!


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

http://marlenadelacroix.com/?p=95

All Hail La Strasser: She’s the “Alexis of Daytime” — Again!

By Marlena De Lacroix

About 1984 or so, when the primetime world was at the height of Dynasty-mania, all the daytime soaps were hustling to introduce characters, all costumed in big-brimmed hats, who were supposed to be the “Alexis of Daytime.” Elizabeth Hubbard, new as Lucinda on As the World Turns, was supposed to be the Alexis of Daytime. Marj Dusay, who played Myrna Clegg on Capitol, was supposed to be the Alexis of Daytime. Judith McConnell, Augusta Lockridge on Santa Barbara, was supposed to be the Alexis of Daytime.

Read more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Robin Strasser is great as the evil bitch. I might get killed for this, but Harding LeMay once said that even though he liked her a lot, she was a very one-note actress. He meant that she could play bitchy very well, but she wasn't very good at other facets. Hence why the gray character Agnes Nixon created especially for her on AMC in the late 70's wasn't very successful.

But La Strasser is one of the biggest and baddest divas in daytime, and has a place in soap history for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That whole scene was awesome. I agree that characters shouldn't be designed to replicate or imitate another but this hardly seems that way given Dorian's rich bitchy history with the show. OLTL was amazing because this is the kind of soap that we haven't been seeing (IMO) in ages, and it is involving predominantly veterans and core families. Strasser was amazing. OLTL has been AWESOME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

'Y&RWorldTurner' wrote

"Robin Strasser is great as the evil bitch. I might get killed for this, but Harding LeMay once said that even though he liked her a lot, she was a very one-note actress."

"Marlena De Lacroix" responds:

Oh please! I interviewed Lemay and the only reason he wrote that Robin is "a one note actress" is because so many people (like me) vocally missed Robin's interpretation of Rachel all the years Vicky Wynhdam played her. Which were a lot of the years snobby Lemay wrote her.

Robin can act anything---any emotion, or else she wouldn't have been able to be on TV nonstop both on soaps and primetime for 40 years. Ever see her hilarious Russian-accented reporter on Murphy Brown? Sympathetic counselor in Baby M? Even today Dorian is many things beside bitchy--motherly (to the Cramer girls), comedienne (to David) etc. I have NEVER been bored by her in 40 years of watching her.

And a word about soap history---don't believe what you read! The only way you can know what really happened is to have known these people personally or been in the middle of soap history yourself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Lemay was misquoted, actually. I think he discussed exactly that topic in his book about AW and he didn't say she was one-note, just something like she had different dominant aspects in her acting or words to that effect. Nor do I think she is one-note.

I remember Robin talking in print about Christina Karras on AMC (maybe to you, Marlena?) and saying that the character was a milquetoast, confused jumble or something, with childhood trauma and sleepwalking episodes. Dorian was and has always been much more clearly defined. And also three-dimensional. She has pathos and trauma and pain but she also has weaknesses and a very dark side.

While I adore her, I frankly thought that when Robin came back in 2003, she was so worried about being let go again from a show she so dearly loved that she played virtually everything totally over the top, and very shrill, with much less subtlety than I remembered. Dorian was a caricature around that time, especially during the Mitch mess. It's only recently that she's regained her pitch-perfect modulation, in my opinion. She has been dazzling since RC took over, and she was spellbinding today.

Just imagine if Robin had taken over the role of Cathy Craig, which I think is what was originally offered to her...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh pelase La Strasser has been a daytime force to be reckoned with since she was the "first Erica Kane" as Rachel on Agnes Nixon's Another World back in 68 or 69--long before Alexis. Alexis is the primetime Strasser if anything ;)

I'd KILl to see Robina s Rachel clips--they seem to just not exist :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the Days ones: https://www.jason47.com/days/synopsesdsn1974A.html
    • I think Dani cares about her sister, but I agree with you. She's using this whole mess to be heard and make herself feel better. I wish Ted and Eva told her to fck off. I had to laugh when Dani commented on her and Anita confronting Ted. She acted as if they destroyed him. That's not what I saw. Dani has been dialed back from those first weeks, but I can't say she's likable. As long as she's throwing shade at Eva for her work as a hairstylist -- while ignoring that she did nothing except eat celery sticks and walk the runway -- she can kiss off. Barely tolerable, and Lindstrom is terrible in the role. I don't find him scary at all, and his money laundering plan is stupid as hell. I gagged when he texted Vanessa to ask if she was thinking about him. That's throw up time.   I just don't see how that makes Ashley any more interesting. And are we really asking for another storyline where a father connects with his adult daughter? I know there's no direct parallel to Eva's story, but come on. If you're in the minority, I'll join you. I have zero interest in any of that. -- I still fail to see Nicole and Vanessa as best friends. Nicole is grounded and stable and responsible, and Vanessa is not. It made more sense to have Dani and Vanessa being close. -- Ashley and Derek were actually OK today. I feel sorry for the actors, honestly, because they've been given nothing. It's crazy, because so much of the rest of the show is firing on all cylinders.    
    • Same. But given how the writers like to have her have good moments and bad moments...and Dani has been background as of late...it's about time she had some bad moments. 
    • I don’t even know why you responded to the bait.
    • I only watch for Sharon and she’s barely on. The only good thing going at the moment is Jack and Diane scenes and they’ve made Diane such a wuss lately which is making that unbearable to watch too 
    • I feel like Earl Hamner and his crew brought in Richard* BECAUSE they knew almost right away that Robert Foxworth was so dull as Chase.  At any event, Richard, IMO, proved to be much more interesting as Angela's chief adversary. (*Or brought him back, depending on whether we're including the original "Vintage Years" pilot).
    • And it will also eventually air S2, which will air its finale in Canada this Thursday, May 15th! https://tvline.com/news/law-and-order-toronto-criminal-intent-season-1-2-the-cw-1235449356/ As an American that has managed to watch it in real time, it's very good. Frankly, I think it's the best of the L&O franchise as of now.
    • You are getting like me. It's getting to the point that without any Damian sightings...it's been the fashion that is holding my interest. And it should not be that way at all. 
    • I don't mind Jan either. If anything, they could be using her more to get her daughter's POV. Not to mention her role as one of the Have-Nots.    I also don't mind the local talent. Just look at soaps that were in NY or the shows that film there, they always go for the local talent and we get to find new faves. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy