Jump to content

Fringe: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It was 2 hours (with commercials--) that's why I think.

I didn't liek tonigth's ep all that much again (and it was another Abrams penned one! so much for him being the best writer on the show...) The object was way too vague and silly, I think Michael Ceveris is a great Broadway performer (his Sweeney was one of the most intense and he's wonderful in the rock musicals he's done with his contemporary vocals and look) but I already find his character, The Observer, too X Files and not in a good way, and I was just left indifferent. great last scene though if that counts for much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

THis ep was written by the two of them. The last ep (which I liked best) had no involvement--although it does sound liek Abrams came up with the overall year long plot (of which he promised there wouldn't be much, bringing in more casual vieers, but already it looks like it could go more complicated than Alias did lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fox picks up ‘Fringe’ for full season

Solid performance leads to back nine order for freshman

By James Hibberd

Fox has picked up a full-season order of J.J. Abrams' sci-fi thriller "Fringe."

The network has ordered the back-nine episodes of the Tuesday night drama, which should come as no surprise to those following its performance in the Nielsens.

After an OK two-hour premiere Aug. 26, the show jumped significantly in Week 2 when paired with Fox's top-rated drama "House." Both shows took a hit when competition increased during broadcast premiere week, then demonstrated stability by growing slightly Tuesday night.

Season-to-date, "Fringe" has averaged a 4.2 rating/11 share among adults 18-49 and 10.7 million total viewers and ranks as the top freshman series in the adult demo.

"The series has really taken off creatively, and it's exciting to see that the audience is responding," Fox's entertainment president Kevin Reilly said.

Added "Fringe" exec producer JJ Abrams, "As with many new series, 'Fringe' is just starting to find its groove. Knowing we'll be around beyond the first thirteen episodes means we'll get to realize the full potential of the show, and for that we are extremely grateful."

"Fringe" stars Anna Torv, Joshua Jackson and John Noble as investigators of paranormal crimes. It's the second freshman series to receive a full order after CW's "90210."


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i37b62a68b259c939e42df0c22225871b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really like it. But it's one of 4 primetime must see's for me and it doesn't hurt that it follows House which is #1 on my list. It's a kind of X-files meets Criminal Minds. I also loved the movie "Altered States" which coincidentially co-starred Blair Brown who also appears in Fringe, and there are themes IMO that are carried over from that movie. The good/bad part, depending on your perspective, is each episode is pretty self contained, so you're not absolutely "Lost" if you didn't catch the preceding episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah Abrams has said that Altered States (great movie) was a huge influence--as was the late 70's era of "body horror" In general (stuff like Cronenberg's films of the time--horror that deforms or affects our bodies)

ABrams has said a number of times how making the show more self contained is important--but already last week with all that about The Observer, etc, already is gettign fairly complex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

An ok episode. I found the father really annoying this week--none of his quirks came off as too funny--maybe I was just in a bad mood, but the episode had a few kinda fun scare moments, and I felt bad for the victim/perpetrator. I loved the explanation for why she's hallucinating her partner though--he's not quite fully back from the dead--but when they did that mind meld thing some of him leaked into her. Hoakey yes--but it surrpised me and made sense. No evil robotic arm woman though :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Beyond the Fringe

The creator of Alias and Lost is back with an eagerly awaited TV series 'for the weirdos'. But why, with its history of great writers, has the UK not produced its own JJ Abrams?

Stephen Armstrong



"I wrote this show for the weirdos," says JJ Abrams, the man who helped bring sci-fi into television's mainstream and creator of Alias and Lost, on the phone from LA. "I like telling stories that have other layers, so that one audience can watch the show and investigate the other levels whilst another can just enjoy the show. Like Lost." He pauses. "Although I'm trying to make Fringe a little easier to follow."

Lost, of course, is notorious for storylines so complex that it is almost impossible for first-time viewers to pick up the show without prior reference to the DVD box set. As a result, US viewers are trickling away at the rate of roughly 1 million a season. Fringe, Abrams says, is episodic, allowing viewers to dip in and out.

It does, however, have a certain similarity to Lost, in that it starts with a plane crash - although the show is based in the US rather than Hawaii, where FBI special agent Olivia Dunham (played by Anna Torv of Mistresses fame), scientist Walter Bishop and his son Peter investigate mind-reading, levitation, invisibility and reanimation of the dead.

Hype has been intense, from both fans and broadcasters - although that has, of course, got its downsides. The pilot was leaked online long before it was finished in the edit. "The problem with this download age is that everyone thinks they have a right to every piece of information in a form where it's impossible to understand its true complexity," Abrams grumbles.

"They also feel they have the right to information and spoilers. My problem isn't really the spoilers - there was a best-selling book of Jaws before the movie so people could find out how it ended - but I would prefer people to see the show as I had intended rather than entirely unfinished. I think this will only increase though."

And when Abrams talks about the show as he had intended, he really is talking about his creative view. Abrams - the JJ stands for Jeffrey Jacob - is all over Fringe, even composing the theme music. At the same time he has a Star Trek prequel movie in post-production, and two other films in development. It's amazing he has time to pick his son up from school.

But what is really curious is that Abrams is by no means an oddity in today's LA. Writers such as Judd Apatow, Tim Kring and Tina Fey are producing TV shows and movies, getting green lights for every project. In the UK, however, which prides itself on a history of great writers, there is almost no one as fecund or powerful in the TV and film industries. So what's going on?

Take Abrams's meteoric career. His film school script Taking Care of Business was snapped up by Hollywood Pictures - a subdivision of Disney - and released in 1990 starring Charles Grodin and James Belushi. By the late 90s he was writing for überproducer Jerry Bruckheimer on films such as the 1998 blockbuster Armageddon and - unusually for a movie writer at that time - branching out into TV, where he wrote, directed and produced Felicity, a glossy college drama.

These days, the migration of big-screen US talent on to the small screen is commonplace - with actors, writers and directors making high-quality extended shows such as The Sopranos without having to meet the demands of Hollywood studios. Fringe, for example, is not exactly short on ambition. Abrams describes the series as inspired by the likes of The X Files, The Twilight Zone and David Cronenberg films - although he warns it is not about aliens and monsters.

"Every episode speaks to the love-hate relationship we all have with technology," he explains. "The fear of nanotechnology, of GM foods, of the US government developing invisibility as a military tool - the possibilities are crazy and terrifying but also attractive. It's heaven and hell."

This level of complexity and vision is what we now expect from television, but in the last decade, top film writers were not also penning for the small screen - Abrams was something of a pioneer.

The reason Abrams managed to straddle both the film and TV worlds, says Simon Pegg, who appeared in Abrams's Mission: Impossible III and plays Scotty in the new Star Trek film, is down to his geekiness and enthusiasm. "He's an absolute fan of film and TV," Pegg explains. "He's part of the generation who are now starting to take over Hollywood. They are the people that grew up with video - loving film and TV, renting it, recording it - and they are now controlling what's being made. It's basically the rise of the geeks."

But where are the British equivalents? Our television boasts few multi-talented, multi-tasking creators and they are mostly from the world of comedy. There's Pegg and his director-collaborator Edgar Wright, Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant, Richard Curtis and - the drama exception - Russell T Davies. Gervais, Pegg and Curtis are now largely making movies for Hollywood and, unlike Abrams, seem disinclined to return to television.

"One reason is the budgets," explains Drew Pearce, creator of ITV2's well-received superhero sitcom No Heroics. "A lot of the ideas that Abrams, Kring and the like have are really genre ideas dressed up as mainstream drama. There's a cost point where British TV just loses interest."

Fear of cost isn't just an issue in drama. Nick Park's forthcoming Wallace and Gromit Christmas short, A Matter Of Loaf and Death, was initially rejected by the BBC for being too expensive, only for the corporation to relent when ITV entered the picture with chequebook in hand. But this cost-cutting attitude means we're in danger of losing the chance to have teams of great show-runners.

Pearce, for instance, is part of a young community of would-be Abramses including Alice Lowe - whose new sitcom, LifeSpam, will be piloted on BBC3 later this year - and the Guardian's Charlie Brooker, whose E4 horror series Dead Set, filmed in the Big Brother house, starts on October 27. When we spoke, however, Pearce was already in LA. US producers had liked No Heroics and invited him over. We may have lost him already.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/29/jj.abrams.television.fringe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy