Jump to content

SONY: Are they in the right?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As many of you may be aware, B&B, Y&R and other soaps' episodes were uploaded on YouTube and other sites daily for months. This was heaven-sent for me and many viewers, whose CBS Player freezes literally every two seconds and have no means to record their shows. However, SONY seems to have realized this recently and they have been essentially looking in every corner of the internet and looking for episodes and claiming copyright infringement.

Of course, these are their shows, but should they really take everything down? Nobody really makes any money out of this, plus they don't have any secret plans to release Y&R and B&B episodes on DVD, do they? So are they right by taking them down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No they aren't. Although the CBS, MSN episodes are in higher quality I loved watching the shows on YouTube without commercials. Plus it was interesting reading the comments and seeing what everyone thought about the episode. I just hope ABC doesn't start removing GH episodes. Sometimes I just don't feel like waiting until I get home to watch the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The selfish part of me wants to say they're in the wrong. But the realistic, business-like part of me has to admit that they have every right to take these videos off and claim copyright infringement. If we say they're in the wrong, then what's the point of even having the copyright laws for shows like this? Sure, it's definitely interesting to see everyone's thoughts and it helps people keep up with a show. But legally, and creatively, Youtube--or any other website like it--doesnt really have the right to just broadcast all these episodes without permission. From Sony's standpoint, if people cant catch an episode online, some of those people may then choose to tune in on television...thus, in theory, making the compnay more money if ratings were to rise. Right? At least I would think so. So I'd say Sony is in the right to do this.

ETA: Also, it may be true that no one is making money out of the episodes being on the internet. But from Sony's perspective, they are potentially losing money because less ppl may be tuning in on TV...making ratings lower...and lowering ad rates....etc. I also think, though, that if companies are going to go on hunts like this, then they need to somehow make their shows more available in mediums other thatn television. And they need to do it right....with good quality, but in my opinion they do have the right to be making money off of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

of course they're right. While they know people arent selling these or making money off them ... they're not making money off them, and thats where the problem comes in. You're not getting the ads from the episodes or from the site embeds.

I just hope they dont take down the vintage clips that they're not planning on using ever again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B was up with YEARS of entire episodes until recently. It was all taken down.

And as copyright hodlers producers have a right for it. (Unfortunately) Yet, when it comes to snippets of episodes I don't think they should exercise it, not just from a fan viewpoint, but also because it is free promotion for the respective series...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Dani cares about her sister, but I agree with you. She's using this whole mess to be heard and make herself feel better. I wish Ted and Eva told her to fck off. I had to laugh when Dani commented on her and Anita confronting Ted. She acted as if they destroyed him. That's not what I saw. Dani has been dialed back from those first weeks, but I can't say she's likable. As long as she's throwing shade at Eva for her work as a hairstylist -- while ignoring that she did nothing except eat celery sticks and walk the runway -- she can kiss off. Barely tolerable, and Lindstrom is terrible in the role. I don't find him scary at all, and his money laundering plan is stupid as hell. I gagged when he texted Vanessa to ask if she was thinking about him. That's throw up time.   I just don't see how that makes Ashley any more interesting. And are we really asking for another storyline where a father connects with his adult daughter? I know there's no direct parallel to Eva's story, but come on. If you're in the minority, I'll join you. I have zero interest in any of that. -- I still fail to see Nicole and Vanessa as best friends. Nicole is grounded and stable and responsible, and Vanessa is not. It made more sense to have Dani and Vanessa being close. -- Ashley and Derek were actually OK today. I feel sorry for the actors, honestly, because they've been given nothing. It's crazy, because so much of the rest of the show is firing on all cylinders.    
    • Same. But given how the writers like to have her have good moments and bad moments...and Dani has been background as of late...it's about time she had some bad moments. 
    • I don’t even know why you responded to the bait.
    • I only watch for Sharon and she’s barely on. The only good thing going at the moment is Jack and Diane scenes and they’ve made Diane such a wuss lately which is making that unbearable to watch too 
    • I feel like Earl Hamner and his crew brought in Richard* BECAUSE they knew almost right away that Robert Foxworth was so dull as Chase.  At any event, Richard, IMO, proved to be much more interesting as Angela's chief adversary. (*Or brought him back, depending on whether we're including the original "Vintage Years" pilot).
    • And it will also eventually air S2, which will air its finale in Canada this Thursday, May 15th! https://tvline.com/news/law-and-order-toronto-criminal-intent-season-1-2-the-cw-1235449356/ As an American that has managed to watch it in real time, it's very good. Frankly, I think it's the best of the L&O franchise as of now.
    • You are getting like me. It's getting to the point that without any Damian sightings...it's been the fashion that is holding my interest. And it should not be that way at all. 
    • I don't mind Jan either. If anything, they could be using her more to get her daughter's POV. Not to mention her role as one of the Have-Nots.    I also don't mind the local talent. Just look at soaps that were in NY or the shows that film there, they always go for the local talent and we get to find new faves. 
    • I'm not going to watch (because...well...that M-dude...lol) but knowing the history between Henry and Roger, I could see Henry wanting to enable Hart to stay independent of Roger. I could even see it as Henry having the last laugh at Roger. Roger hated "the Henry's" of the world, which basically meant anyone who had money and social prominence. Twice Roger swindled Henry out of a chunk of his fortune, so giving some to Hart, who hates his father, is a form of karma.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy