Jump to content

emmy noms that would be awful!


bakedghoti

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I don't think it will happen but you never know with Y&R. I mean what is he? A glorified BARRISTA? He's Gina with a bad mother and obnoxious brother. Oh wait Gina had an obnoxious brother. And I'm being mean to poor Gina.

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

ATWT....Teri Columbino. The thought of ONE freakin' decent scene all year (calling Jack out) leading to an emmy nom would kill me.

I'm on board with Van not getting nom'd either. But, I'm sadly resigned to it, even if the Younger Lead wasn't a notoriously weak category.

  • Members
Posted

I think the only Y&R actors really deserving of a nom this year are Melody Thomas Scott and Judith Chapman. Scott really gave her heart and soul to the material this past year. Of course, she's really been phoning it in of late and looks ridiculously bored with the David storyline, but for most of the eligibility period, she was fantastic. Sure, Chapman's an airtime hog and has been annoying of late, but she did have some standout scenes throughout the year. Any other Y&R noms would NOT be deserved IMO. Well, maybe Sharon Case (is she even a pre-nominee? I forgot), since I have a soft spot for her and think she's very underrated. Other than that, no one did any outstanding work this past year.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I guess it depends on your device.  I can watch CW shows via their website on my Windows PC.
    • Ooooo A Liam episode? I'll watch it later today. They sure are churning the daily episodes out early.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Welcome back, Shawn Douglas! It's been a while. It really is too bad that the writers don't really have an interest in the character because there are still a lot of ways that he can be used effectively on the canvas. He should have been a part of the 60th anniversary celebrations as well. If anything, just to represent Bo and Hope. And I'd much rather see Jada paired with him than possibly with Theo. But I enjoyed him getting caught up with Belle, and comforting her. I'm sure they'll find their way back to each other at some point but I do like them as divorced friends. I just hope we see it play out onscreen. Belle being a dick about Sami again was unnecessary though. And we finally saw Liam again!  I'm curious to see how this storyline is going to play out, and who's going to be weaved into it. He and Abe do work well together too. And we learned that he has a kid. Hopefully, we'll learn more about his character in the future. But I'm not really sure about Johnny and Chanel suddenly having problems with raising Trey. They've wanted a baby for so long, so I don't understand why this is even an issue. They should know by now what it's like to raise a baby. But I did enjoy Johnny's scenes with EJ, and that Johnny still hasn't refused to forgive him. This storyline was/is very clunky, but having the two of them be at odds is the right decision. There's so much story potential that can be drawn from that. As for Chad... there was no time for us to see his reunion with Will, but there's time for us to see him talking BS with Leo? I don't get it. And I don't get all this random dating app stuff either. Leo and Javi were boring af too. If we're forced to endure them, can they at least have some real conflict? The two of them losing the baby was the perfect opportunity for it. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I enjoy BF better on Days than on YR.   Chad is greater than Cane, in my opinion.
    • Ick! Seeing MS and BF making out as the characters onscreen was just ewwww.
    • The SON board.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy