Jump to content

GH/RH: Claire Labine


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I liked her GL stint. I know thats not a popular opinion but GL was just so awful in its last couple of years under B&E (shocker) that Labine was something of a savior. It's true that the parts were better than the whole but nobody can write a teary scene like Labine (Jim's death by fire). Id wager that her stint at GL is better than anything GL has had in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL and GL weren't very good under her watch, but a lot of the blame for those can be placed on weak or tyrant EP's and ABC and P&G.

However, during Claire's stints at both those shows, the dialogue was superb. That's one thing her shows are known for. GH was never really known for its great dialogue until Labine came, Ryan's Hope won the Emmy for Writing more than any other soap, and they were all under her watch.

If Claire won't come back writing for soaps, her son and daughter (Matt and Eleanor) should come back, they did train under her after all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is, Claire's writing style was a huge departure from GH had been ever since Gloria Monty came and changed the whole structure of the show (and most of daytime really). GH had been known for outrageous plot-driven tales until Wendy Riche decided the show needed to switch formats. I remember one of Riche's first interviews when she became EP if GH where she said she'd like to move the show in a more character driven direction. Like a year and a half later, Labine joined her at GH and the show took on that approach.

A lot of fans did complain that Claire's GH was too heavy on the social issues and at times was very depressing. In fact, GH's ratings fell towards the end of Claire's run and would get a big bump with the switch to Guza's first stint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I slightly disagree on a couple fronts.

He wrote Jason & Robin's love story beautifully up until Cottage Hell. He even worked with Kimberly's weird schedule for school.

And Jax & Brenda had heart. However Guza-fied that triangle did end up, there was still a beautiful romance there.

However, doing the Guza years he destroyed some great couples and did some real damage to the core families.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then Guza changed the format back again into a mob soap on steroids – I think that if you compare a Labine episode and a Guza episode, Guza has doubled the number of scenes in an episode, thus changing the overall feel and pace of the show dramatically.

Yeah, Rauch, known for his impossibly difficult personality. He did wonders with Lemay though; he just couldn't resist the temptation to hire his friend Lloyd 'Lucky' Gold. <_<

And on OLTL was it Maxine Levinson or Jill Farren Phelps? :rolleyes: That was just a filler stint – she had a year in her contract and they just gave her the post to fulfil all the conditions in the contract. She has admitted all her mistakes during that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I thought Jason/Robin was mostly Richard Culliton and then Chris Whitesell/Janet Iacobuzio. What year was their romance?

Like Alvin said, Guza had Karen Harris (who should be GH's HW or at least co-HW) in '96.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are so many reasons to despise the man, yet with him at the helm, I just know the team will be stable. Once he's gone, all hell will break loose. I don't hate him so fervently, the way I hate Latham, for example. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, many of those writers on GH now didn't leave when Guza left before. Some did, but GH can manage with most of them and being Guza-less at the same time.

The two biggies, Harris and Val Jean both started under Labine, not Guza. Korte was also there starting with Labine too, and even though she's Guza's #2, I doubt she'll leave if Guza gets fired.

Fire Guza and make Val Jean and Harris Co-HW's and send Mulcahey back to GH from B&B. :)

None of that will ever happen, but I can dream. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy