Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Thanks. Was one of Cruz's relatives in the story about Hayley being run over? I thought she might have been the girl who was backhanded by her boyfriend/the killer.

I was also going to ask - if I already have my apologies, I forget these things - what you thought of Courtney Capwell. All I generally know of her or reaction to her was someone writing a letter to Diva Von Dish saying she and her story and relationship were boring and cliched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
SO true- some of the best asses in the business! In all seriousness, Peter Love had that same natural quality to his acting that A Martinez always had, even though he obviously was never quite as good an actor as A. I absolutely adore Peter though and LOVED them as brothers! Ric Castillo should have stayed on the canvas until the end.

Personally I believe that Ric Castillo has remained too long in the soap. I liked him in the Parisian storyline, but just arrived in Santa Barbara, for me he began to lose interest. I've seen more chemistry between Kelly and Robert. Ricardo was a character heavy, always angry and then suddenly becomes good, and he dispenses good advice to all. Ricardo was really heavy for me. Carmencita Castillo was less annoying. Although she did not leave a mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In fact both Harland and his wife Gretchen Richards left the show between October and November 1990. The Dobsons back on the show in December of that year. So it was not their choice. I must say that 1990 was the worst year of SB (even if the worst year of SB is better than any other soap operas). The producer of that time, John Conboy, was one of the worst disasters ever beat on SB. He decided to redesign the Capwell house, destroying the strong Hispanic impression , and typified by reducing it to any set of any soap opera. He was obsessed with the pole and he wanted that Cruz become a polo player. Fortunately, he abandoned the idea. He gave birth to that awful country club, the history of the talisman. The only good thing was that he decided to return the Lockridges: in 1990 it returned Lionel, Minx, and Laken. For the rest .... best forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that Courtney has been one of my favorite characters ever. She and her sister Madeleine. Especially Madeleine was killed too early. She was snobbish, spoiled and bad: all carried to extremes, SB-style. Courtney, however, was more pliant, more gentle, but also profoundly restless. Courtney was in the middle of one of the most turbulent puzzles by the times of the murder of Channing Junior. Madeleine's murder.

Madeline Capwell Laurent married to David arrived from Boston in the lovely city of Santa Barbara, California with her sister Courtney, invading the house of the unaware Uncle Channing that was forced to host both the women under her roof, without notice.image002.jpg

Soon, Madeline will prove a real pain in the ass, weaving plots behind Uncle Channing with the complicity of his eternal rival Lionel Lockridge and reducing Pearl Bradford to his personal butler.

image009.jpg

Who bothers you, you know, eventually pays.

And so, in the episodes of 1986, Madeline Capwell is found in her bungalow, her head smashed with a hammer at the hands of some avenger. Now, Capwell, you know that too, conduct business in the family: Sophia, for example, has killed her son. Want to see Madeline was executed by a snake related? Yes, but the reality is much more complex.

At trial, defended by Julia Wainwright, David Laurent ends, the husband of Madeline came to the bungalow shortly before her death for her to sign the divorce papers and, therefore, suspected of having also served up a few blows on the head for receiving a rebuff .

image002.jpg

In fact, the only fault was that of David having abandoned it shortly after the attack, without realizing that the victim was still breathing, and blood staining his shirt, in an attempt to revive her. The District Attorney will therefore rely on the offense of failure to rescue, but defense will win the day anyway.

The lawyer Julia fall in love madly with his client, much to his firm belief in the innocence and get him acquitted. The two begin to celebrate the acquittal of David in the mountains of California, after a stressful process that is an understatement, but as soon reached the hut, the lawyer discovers a bloodstained dumbbell between the personal effects of her boyfriend. The coroner will confirm that the circumference of the object coincides perfectly with the wounds inflicted upon the victim. And 'all hell broke loose. David Laurent also comes to the cabin and he was arrested just in time. But ... after a few months, crowning one of the most formidable yellow I've ever seen, an avid writer in the story of Madeline reveal the identity of real killer.

Courtney Capwell - Madeline's sister so hard that he had participated in the surveys - is stuck in a kind of experiment, which recreates the judicial phase of the murder. Invited to treason in the bungalow where her sister was in, will be forced to admit to killing her in self-defense. The same Madeline, in fact, willing to take even his father's inheritance, had threatened her with a gun forcing her to leave her lying on the floor and hit ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never understood why the show didn't give Todd McKee more to do. And the way he was marginalized made no sense, since he was a good actor and had chemistry with both Laken and Hayley. The show could have easily delved into the young adult relationships more, and gotten back into the Capwell/Lockridge dynamic by really getting Ted and Laken back together. Instead, they paired Hayley with Jake (I had no problem with them breaking Ted and Hayley up, she had gotten a little too high and mighty for my tastes by then), who had absolutely no chemistry; and they wasted the repairing of Ted and Laken by breaking them up again too soon. Then they killed off Hayley, Laken took off again, Jake left town, and Ted was left with nothing to do. It never made any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was always a Ted/Hayley backer, but I didn't mind the Jake/Hayley story too much. The problem was the show didn't seem to know what to do because it was so wrapped up in the Cruz/Eden and Kelly/Jeffrey stories that you were lucky to get a sniff of story if you were a secondary character. Then, when the time came to do something dramatic, it was like "let's kill someone off!"

To be fair, Santa Barbara did that a lot with its secondary characters and I think that created problems with the show's continuity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very true. I think this was actually my biggest problem with the show. Unlike other soaps I watched back in the day (ATWT and AMC come to mind - I guess I watched one from each network), SB was way too focused on too few primary characters and didn't do a great job with balancing storylines. If you weren't invested in a primary character (like Cruz and/or Eden), the show could be infuriating. Yet, it still was my favorite soap, because it was just so different in its sensibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hadn't thought about it that way, but you're right. Secondary characters were actually pretty dull and lifeless, and seemed to exist just to fill time in between Cruz-Eden-Kelly-Mason-Julia-CC-Sophia-Augusta-Lionel-Gina-Keith scenes. Of course, those characters, their portrayers, and the writing for them were so freaking fabulous I didn't mind in the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved Mason, Julia, Gina and Keith. I also really liked Lionel and Augusta, but their storyline lost some steam, and then Louise Sorel left. Kelly I mostly liked. I was hit or miss with CC and Sophia. CC was a nasty a--hole, and Sophia wasn't the most sympathetic character, but they did well together. My biggest problem was that I wasn't a Cruz & Eden fan, which became especially problematic around '87 or so - they were written into every storyline so you couldn't escape them. I wish the show had played up (and not killed off so many) and given more depth to secondary characters like Brick, Amy, Ted, Laken, Warren, Hayley, Jane, Pearl, and even Christy. It would have balanced things out some and added some heft to the show. Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly, but I just don't recall a show relying so much on so few characters.

Even though it was critically slammed in the early years, I'm most fond of SB from'84 to '87 or so. I kept watching through '89, until Robin Wright, Lane Davies, and Todd McKee had all left, and the Lockridges were pretty much decimated. I know they reintroduced the Lockridges, so to speak, later on, but by then I just couldn't get back into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy