This is the Presidential Campaign Thread.

Barack Obama Vs. John McCain.

Edited November 6, 200817 yr by Toups

I still think she has to appear to have a real grasp on whatever comes up in the debate.

I will be impressed if she does this.

The only way the Senate can pass that bill before the House is if someone amends the Constitution between now and Wednesday. That bill MUST originate in the House.

Actually thats not the part I thought was bad, I thought the worst part was when she couldn't come up with a good excuse for comments she made about being able to see russia from her house; the other part I thought was bad was her comments about putin/russia trading with alaska. There was nothing wrong with the way Katie Couric handled the interview, when you are in a government position or potential position you need to have clear and concise answers on the spot, she just comes up with dumb replies or doesn't answer the quesition at all. Katie is not to blame for Palin not being able to come up with good answers. I have a real problem with someone that could be the potential VP of the U.S. seeming like she doesn't know what shes talking about and it really reflects badly on McCain.

I thought the interview was comical. It was so bad it was funny. When she was asked about the economic meltdown, it was horrible. I actually felt sorry for her. She appeared to have no confidence.

You know, Katie Couric did fine. I didn't think she bullied her and in fact asked pretty predictable questions.

Some of you may find this entertaining:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/29/m...a_n_130359.html

David Shuster seems to be on a mission.

Wales, he's all over the damn place!

He can't keep his lies straigfht! I'm surprised his head didn't explode!

I thought the interview was comical. It was so bad it was funny. When she was asked about the economic meltdown, it was horrible. I actually felt sorry for her. She appeared to have no confidence.

You know, Katie Couric did fine. I didn't think she bullied her and in fact asked pretty predictable questions.

ITA Katie was fine. Those question's about the economy and Alaska were fine. It was Palins answers that were terrible, she started of saying one thing and then she went to something completely different that had nothing what so ever to do with the question.

You know, it's never Palin's fault.

It's always the interviewer's fault.

The only person you haven't heard about giving her a bad interview is the "Fair & Balanced" Sean Hannity.

You know, it's never Palin's fault.

It's always the interviewer's fault.

The only person you haven't heard about giving her a bad interview is the "Fair & Balanced" Sean Hannity.

We get a lot of the presidental stuff on Cable TV here in Australia, Fox New's, CNN, and there is what I watch on clips as well.

It has gotten to the point that every time Palin opens her mouth I start to cringe.

I guess the republican's need to lay the blame somewhere, they just won't admit that McCain made the wrong choice in Palin.

But then again if I was allowed to vote there is no way that I would vote for McCain no matter who he chose as I get a bad vibe from him everytime I see him or hear him speak. He reminds me far to much of Bush.

Edited September 30, 200817 yr by SnCCorinthos4ever

The only way the Senate can pass that bill before the House is if someone amends the Constitution between now and Wednesday. That bill MUST originate in the House.

The Senate passing the bill first does not make it law..the bill will have to pass both branches....its does not matter in which order..

Just because the bill originates in the House does not mean they have to vote first..

Edited September 30, 200817 yr by Casey008

I wonder what happened to the notion that more people were "energized" for this election?

Ratings for first McCain/Obama debate 16% less that first Bush/Kerry debate..

NielsenWire

The Senate passing the bill first does not make it law..the bill will have to pass both branches....its does not matter in which order..

Just because the bill originates in the House does not mean they have to vote first..

I wonder what happened to the notion that more people were "energized" for this election?

Ratings for first McCain/Obama debate 16% less that first Bush/Kerry debate..

NielsenWire

Maybe it was because they tuned out McCain....

Because Nielsen ratings have reported that the section that scored the least viewers? In McCain's own home state of Arizona.

Perhaps the lower ratings stem from the fact it was on a Friday night. I remember someone bringing that up on this board previously.

Wales, he's all over the damn place!

He can't keep his lies straigfht! I'm surprised his head didn't explode!

I watched it again and thought it was hilarious....especially that McCain went to get things done when he suspended his campaign but then he didn't want to sit around at the pizza session since it would become partisan. Things like this ought to be part of an instructional video showing kids how it looks when you constantly lie.

It's unfortunately a given that politicians lie but McCain and his campaign have introduced a whole new level of lying that's difficult to even put into words.

That whole Pakistan argument to which he's determined to hold on is just another example of how his stubborness is out of control.....so now it's the "gotcha" media that's responsible for Palin answering a question (that gives her an Obama position and a position that Bush ended up adopting this year) even though it was not asked by a voter who is not part of the media.

Perhaps the lower ratings stem from the fact it was on a Friday night. I remember someone bringing that up on this board previously.

That would be me. I didn't think that Friday was a good night on which to hold a debate. Any other week day is better with Tuesday-Thursday being the best.

I think this week's debate is on an ideal night and should do a lot better....especially due to the curiosity factor and since there is only one VP debate.

And I don't think that the ratings should be seen as an indication of how people feel about this election. Some people are simply not interested in debates and don't find them beneficial. I'm sure anyone who has made up his/her mind and aren't interested in debates, have less incentive to spend time watching one....especially on a Friday night.

Edited September 30, 200817 yr by Wales2004

I wonder what happened to the notion that more people were "energized" for this election?

Ratings for first McCain/Obama debate 16% less that first Bush/Kerry debate..

NielsenWire

I bet the ratings for Thursday will beat it.