Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have always wondered what it was that made him so racist. I've never broached the subject with him as an adult, but perhaps it is because of the era in which he grew up. I have noticed that he has mellowed a bit with old age.

Cheney deserves the scrutiny, IMHO. His backdoor deals are something that need to be investigated with a fine tooth comb. Especially regarding the "Energy Policy" he crafted at the beginning of this administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is probably the post of yours to which I meant to reply. I don't use the word community to refer to people unless I'm actually talking about a real community. I think when you get to the point where you consider that his running for the presidency might just be insprational to more than just some black people, it will be an excellent thing.

I was joking because Bush is a part of the government which is EOE with or without him.

Pointing Condoleeza Rice out as an example of diversity or as a reason to give Bush credit is just funny to me. She's one person.

Do you think that I believe hiring a few black peple is reaching equality? Or do you think I might think that not having this conversation at all would be more of a measure of equality since we would have arrived at a point where you would not feel the need to point to one person as an example of how the Republican party can be diverse?

Equality won't be achieved until we get to a point and time where every white person in a position of power or authority stops seeing people of other races as inferior. That's how simple it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, in my post, I was discussing specifically how some black people might perceive a Barack Obama presidency, thus the reference to the black community. I'm absolutely sure there are other groups of people who may be inspired by what he is accomplishing, just as I see lots of men inspired by the barriers women like Geraldine Ferraro, Hillary Clinton, and Sarah Palin have and continue to break through.

I think you may have misunderstood my comment. But that's okay... it will be our mutually silly moment. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UGHHH!!! It's all over! Palin is corrupt! OMG!!!

:lol:

This is one of the biggest non-stories I have seen today..

Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing.

However, Palin's chief of staff did authorize the travel to Washington.

It's true, Palin didn't authorize the trip... Perhaps it is Palin's Chief of Staff who should be taken to task for overstepping his bounds and going around his boss... and, besides, it certainly sounds like NOBODY authorized Monegan's lobbying of Congress. Overstepping bounds, working around established policy... it's like Obama going to Iraq and insiting the Iraqi government delay the troop pullout until AFTER the election! Oh, wait... that's a separate scandal...

Monegan told ABC that the travel authorization was explicitly to pursue funding for the anti-sexual-violence program, though the document does not state that as a reason for the trip.

"He was not authorized to lobby Congress," Griffin said.

There is nothing here... it's partisan political BS. But typical election year garbage... like Clinton's first Bimbo Eruption or tabloit reports of Gary Hart's Love Boat...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OK, sound the alarm. That one is no fair Brian. :lol: :lol: There is a tremendous difference in expectations for Condi and Roman. Condi is after all a PUBLIC official and Roman is a PRIVATE citizen.

Now, I gave money to the Red Cross and I also exercised my right and responsibility as a citizen to write my Congressman and complain about the abysmal federal response. Therefore, I guess I can criticize Condi. B) That one just doesn't work.

By the way, hats' off for WoST contribution. You $1,000 far exceeded my donation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We are going to have to disagree on that one too. Palin said she fired Monegan in part for insubordination because he made an unauthorized trip to lobby Washington. Now, it the trip was authorized, then it wasn't unauthorized. Obviously Palin had designated authority to her chief of staff. If he has the authority and then she fires people and says the trip is unauthorized, then she ain't much of manager (that would work against the arguments about her executive experience).

Now Monegan says the trip was to lobby and the COS knew it was for lobbying. If the COS did not know it was for lobbying, and if then what did the COS think it was for? I guess we can't know that because the COS is dodging the subpoena. That, of course, raises questions about why he is dodging the questions and the subpoena.

I think Palin is an idiot for handling this the way she is. There is no way to prove whether she fired him because of the brother-in-law or not. Dealing with this in one day and getting it behind her is far better than the daily trickle of information that counters her explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe it to be reaching a certain degree of equality. I believe it to be an important step in the right direction.

It will be hard to reach that point (not needing to have a conversation at all about equal opportunity) when the important step of hiring "one person" is poo-pooed as not being enough. We cant go from prevalent discrimination to a total eradication in the blink of an eye. There has to be steps toward progress. It's disturbing to me that someone tries to adhere to civil rights by hiring a minority, then are accused of not doing enough. It seems that one that is trying to make things better might be discouraged when their efforts are minimalized. This fastidious selectiveness could possibly defeat and undermine the entire purpose in the pursuit of equality.

Understandable. But you have to praise efforts along the way to this goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe it to be a brilliant method to handle the situation. If this is the worst thing that can be dug up from her past, then she is home free. Palin letting this situation linger on only allows for the Democrats and leftist media to add to their appearance of desperation. They attack any new bit of information out of troopergate like a pack of wild dogs on a dead carcus. The more nuances from this situation that are covered, on a daily basis by the media, will only lead to the public losing interest..

The real meat of the matter is whether or not she abused power...as you said, Jess, this cannot be proven from any evidence that has been provided. I've been wondering all along as to when the Dems will just give up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How is that obvious here?

It was stated in the article that trips to Washington to meet with state representatives on issues was routine. Of course Monegan would say it was to lobby and that everyone knew that was the purpose of the trip... Does it really stretch the imagination to think that this guy MIGHT be lying? Honestly...

What is so ridiculous about all of this is that Palin and company knew this was going to happen... they knew the story would be pumped in the media... That tells me they know nothing will come of it. Why push forth as VP nominee if you KNOW you've done something, and in recent history, that could blow up right before the election or, worse, just months into your new term.

Come on... We've seen this sort of thing play out before -- and just recently in the Bush White House. Nothing has come of that nonsense... nothing will come from this, either. It serves only as great drama, giving partisans something to blow up on message boards like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I expect nothing of Condi, to be honest. I wasn't terribly interested at the time in what she was or wasn't doing, particularly as it relates to her personal reactions to Hurricane Katrina. As for my expectations of Roman? I have none there, either. People are people... public or private... I have up expectations a long time ago.

I suppose I had expectations that Mayor Ray Nagin and former Governor Kathleen Blanco could have been more competetent, but those hopes were shattered when they did their best to avoid repercussions for their failures while passing the buck on to others... But that's another post for another time. :D

And as far as your contribution, Jess... the amount doesn't matter... the fact that you did makes a world of difference! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • 5-19   A mixed bag. On one hand, it's a pretty good episode. Amanda's return is having immediate impact. And I'm here for everyone in Damian's orbit. On the other hand, it still had an air of stalling out this Dumas storyline which has immediately gotten annoying. Okay been annoying. Side-note...Sally is just wasting away being with Billy.   The Bad for Me:   We get more attention on Summer now that she's not on the canvas than we did when she was still on the canvas. It just seems like JG is butthurt that AL left. No one to blame, but himself.    I know we are not going to have Amanda against Billy/Sally. A waste of an actress. Speaking of Amanda, I don't think I will ever get used to the Giggly Heffa/Amanda friendship.   Why mention Jill and that she's retired...which sounds like we are NEVER getting Jess Walton back btw...and have Amanda tell Billy to make amends with her...if she's not coming back?   What was Good for Me:   Just Amanda's presence. Her meeting with Devon, Billy, and Nate. Her meeting with Giggly Heffa. Her meeting with Billy and Sally. And just the air of mystery that MM is giving to Amanda. That intrigues. And to be clear...is the dialogue saying that she knows who Dumas is because she has seen him face-to-face or do they video-talk or move through his assistant? I was unclear. But it would be VERY interesting if she has seen his face and know who it really is.    Awwww at Amy and Damian reaching a point where they are completely getting along. But I liked the scenes with them and Nate, Devon, and Lily. And Damian and Lily...I like of course. 
    • I watched that cow Reva tell Trish she was dumping HB in utter disbelief. When even Trish is staring at you like you are an ungrateful bitch, all because of a guy you met six months (or so) ago, you are a 'ho. How Reva and Zimmer survived this clunker remains a mystery to me. Were she and Kyle really that well received? Or did the writers realize they'd gone too far and write Reva's suicide attempt to softly reboot the character? Nowadays, David definitely would've been crushing on Kyle and jealousy over being rejected by him after Kyle found the Lewises would've driven him to try and kill him. Rick/Mindy FTW. I think Michael and Krista really were sparkly.  I understand what they were trying to do with Kurt, but BLECH.
    • January 1974 Y&R Jeanne Cooper debut.
    • I think Telma and Jonelle are too old.  Tonya Pinkins is a good choice. 
    • I must have been on a sabbatical from watching GL during much of 1985 because most of the episodes that have been uploaded recently were completely unknown to me, so I have a few thoughts: FINALLY got to see Locke Walls! I had heard of the character from story synopses and discussion on GL MBs, but I had never seen him before. I really liked Jeremy Slate as Locke. I know this was the height of the "Just Say No" 80s, but the hysteria over the "evils" of the music industry made me laugh out loud. Alex having a meltdown over the music industry destroying her baby boy, when he should be "safe" working at Spaulding was particularly funny. At this point in the story she thought her brother was dead in the jungles of San Rios because of his overreaching ambitions as the head of Spaulding. Also, she was a music groupie, falling for two musicians! The scenes with Locke's death were very poignant, and made me think how badly they shafted Beverlee. She was on the show for something like five years before they gave her a real romantic story. Every character close to her leaves or dies on her. No wonder they stuck her in the stupid Simon storyline, just so she would have someone to care about. I missed almost everything to do with the Claire pregnancy storyline. I think I started watching again after Michelle was born and she wanted to kill her baby. First thought: Good God, Maureen, you had the perfect chance to yeet Ed out of your life, why didn't you take it? Also, it seems strange how close Ed, Mo, Fletch, and Claire remained after the first shock of discovery. Especially since I mostly remember Claire turning into pratically a psycho later on. I'm not surprised now by some of the things Susan Pratt has said about what they did to the character. Were there different writers by then?  My thoughts exactly...but it was nice to see Babara Garrick as Charlotte. She was really good at playing this kind of character. YES, and WHY? Fletcher at least was a journalist, but why would anyone want Mo to host a radio show? The Reva/Kyle stuff: wasn't a fan of the latter part of their storyline and now not a fan of the earlier part of their storyline. And, ugh, Maeve. So boring. So dull. But I guess she had to be because no one could outshine you know who. David/Suzette/Jackson: WTF is it with that David character? Is he in love with Kyle? His whole schtick is Kyle, Kyle, Kyle, Kyle, I hate Springfield, I want to go back to New York, Kyle, Kyle, Kyle, Kyle, why are we still in Springfield, Kyle, Kyle, Kyle, Kyle. And poor Frances Fisher as Suzette! First she's begging David to pay attention to her and make love to her, but (his) thoughts of Kyle keep getting in the way of that. Then she becomes obsessed with Lujack, who is, what, 19 years old? Ew. I kind of like Michael Wilding Jr. (he comes across as a little raw in the beginning though he improves a bit over time) but the character existed for one reason: to be in love with Beth, who was also too young for him. But I guess that's because he and Suzette are Big Bad Music Industry People. So much time and investment in Lujack and Beth as a romantic couple. That music video storyline must have cost them a pretty penny to produce...still can't believe they killed him off just because the EP was mad VI wanted to try his luck in Hollywood.  Finally, the Rick/Roxy/Kurt/Mindy stuff: watching Rick and Mindy pretending to be a couple so they can stay at the boarding house and keep tabs on Kurt and Roxy's faux marriage made me think one thing: please dump Kurt and Roxy, they are boring AF. Rick and Mindy were adorable and funny together and should have been a long-term love story. I will die on this hill.
    • Telma Hopkins Jonelle Allen Tonya Pinkins
    • Yes. Something about Charlotte and Alicia being sisters and a childhood with an abusive drunk father. I couldn't watch the explanation, which seems to be an orchestrated "gotcha" moment by Fletch sort of "haunting" Alicia at the tv station. (I hadn't quite realized WSPR was around before Holly.) I think the radio thing was to make Fletch relevant. Long learned that globe-trotting peeps like Quint and Helena needed something to do in Springfield. Can't count on murder trials to keep the newspaper a-hoppin'.  I swear the actress playing Alicia also had a role on ATWT---maybe she was Olivia Wycroft. I keep meaning to look that up. As much as I've criticized Simon, at least you can see there's something going on within him. VanVleet just feels like an aging playboy trying desperately to play a serious person. Yes, Leslie Dennison's Carolyn Crawford was a parapalegic on ATWT. LD's a lovely person, but a boring actress, imo. I was surprised to realize they really did show Billy having nightmares due to his brainwashing. It's mostly the same thing over and over, but I had only heard Vanessa telling Ross after Billy had been arrested before.
    • SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER 1973 PREEMPTION & SPECIALS DATA: As expected, we are missing the weeks of 9/3/73-10/26/73. However, from a check of the daily newspaper listings, as well as the Vanderbilt News Archives, I have compiled the expected preemptions & specials for that time frame. Although we won't know the # of full preemptions for September, we can figure out the October preemptions by looking at the # of telecasts in November, so some additional info can be gleaned from that eventually. For now, here is what I have for the missing two months: WED 9/5/73 ALL 3-342PM: President Nixon Press Conference MON 9/24/73 ABC 10AM-430PM: Watergate TUE 9/25/73 NBC 10AM-6PM: Watergate WED 9/26/73 CBS 10AM-445PM: Watergate  (Vanderbilt lists "OPEN 206-302PM?") WED 10/3/73 CBS 10AM-5PM: Watergate   WED 10/3/73 ABC 430-530PM ABC Afterschool Specials: Rookie of the Year MON 10/8/73 NBC 2-(448) NCLS Game TUE 10/9/73 NBC 2-(507) & (507)-onward NLCS Game & ALCS Game WED 10/10/73 ABC 251-252PM, 309-316PM, 325-326PM Spiro Agnew Resignation Bulletins WED 10/10/73 CBS 246-247PM, 259-303PM, 324-326PM, 440-442PM Spiro Agnew Resignation Bulletins WED 10/10/73 NBC 2-(440) & (440)-onward NCLS Game & ALCS Game WED 10/10/73 NBC 249-251PM, 323-326PM, 349-351PM, 455-457PM Spiro Agnew Resignation Bulletins THU 10/11/73 ALL 11-1158AM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference THU 10/11/73 CBS 3-430PM CBS Daytime 90: Tiger on a Chain THU 10/11/73 NBC 330-(onward) ALCS Game TUE 10/23/73 ALL 11-1204PM: Eliot Richardson Press Conference  TUE 10/23/73 ABC 231-232PM, 308-310PM News Bulletins TUE 10/23/73 NBC 236-238PM News Bulletin WED 10/24/73 ABC 430-530PM ABC Afterschool Specials: The Incredible, Indelible, Magical, Physical Mystery Trip (repeat of 2/7/73) THU 10/25/73 ABC & CBS 12-1PM (NBC 12-1238PM) Secretary Kissinger Press Conference
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy