Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

And now, the ENTIRE article:

"Obama has no background in economics. Who advises him? The Post says it's Franklin Raines, for "advice on mortgage and housing policy." Shocking. Under Raines, Fannie Mae committed "extensive financial fraud." Raines made millions. Fannie Mae collapsed. Taxpayers? Stuck with the bill."

--McCain video release, September 18, 2008.

An already nasty presidential election campaign is getting nastier. The meltdown on Wall Street has touched off frantic attempts by both the McCain and Obama camps to secure political advantage and indulge in guilt by association. Over the last 24 hours, both campaigns have issued video press releases (let's not call them ads until they actually air somewhere) attempting to show that the other side's "advisers" are somehow responsible for the crisis. The latest McCain attack is particularly dubious.

The Facts

The McCain video attempts to link Obama to Franklin Raines, the former CEO of the bankrupt mortgage giant, Fannie Mae, who also happens to be African-American. It then shows a photograph of an elderly white woman taxpayer who has supposedly been "stuck with the bill" as a result of the "extensive financial fraud" at Fannie Mae.

The Obama campaign last night issued a statement by Raines insisting, "I am not an advisor to Barack Obama, nor have I provided his campaign with advice on housing or economic matters." Obama spokesman Bill Burton went a little further, telling me in an e-mail that the campaign had "neither sought nor received" advice from Raines "on any matter."

So what evidence does the McCain campaign have for the supposed Obama-Raines connection? It is pretty flimsy, but it is not made up completely out of whole cloth. McCain spokesman Brian Rogers points to three items in the Washington Post in July and August. It turns out that the three items (including an editorial) all rely on the same single conversation, between Raines and a Washington Post reporter, Anita Huslin, who wrote a Style section profile of the discredited Fannie Mae boss that appeared on July 16. The profile reported that Raines, who retired from Fannie Mae four years ago, had "taken calls from Barack Obama's presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters."

Since this has now become a campaign issue, I asked Huslin to provide the exact circumstances of the quote. She explained that she was chatting with Raines during the photo shoot, and asked "if he was engaged at all with the Democrats' quest for the White House. He said that he had gotten a couple of calls from the Obama campaign. I asked him about what, and he said 'oh, general housing, economy issues.' ('Not mortgage/foreclosure meltdown or Fannie-specific,' I asked, and he said 'no.')"

By Raines's own account, he took a couple of calls from someone on the Obama campaign, and they had some general discussions about economic issues. I have asked both Raines and the Obama people for more details on these calls, and will let you know if I receive a reply.

The Pinocchio Test

The McCain campaign is clearly exaggerating wildly in attempting to depict Franklin Raines as a close adviser to Obama on "housing and mortgage policy." If we are to believe Raines, he did have a couple of telephone conversations with someone in the Obama campaign. But that hardly makes him an adviser to the candidate himself--and certainly not in the way depicted in the McCain video release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Obama holds a B.A. in political science with specialization on international relations from Columbia, plus while in the Senate he's been on the Foreign Relations Committee and chaired the subcommittee on Europe, while John McCain has made several gaffes on the issue of foreign affairs, including one about Spain and another about the status of Czechoslovakia.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. This has been refuted but apparently the truth takes a very long time to travel back to the Republican Information Tank.....or maybe their whole system has been overloaded with lies to the point that false = true.

And then there is this gem.....which I give a million stars today!!!

Now that we put to bed Obama's qualifications (he's a banking expert because he's been in the bank and can see them all across the country :lol::lol::lol: ). Is McCain irrelevant becoming irrelevant on his own ticket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So did Raines not provide advise to the Obama camp? I think that makes him an advisor...

How many more people are going to be thrown under the bus by Obama?

I hardly talked to Raines...I didn't know Jeremiah Wright had those views...I am not friends with Bill Ayers...

And some say John McCain sold his sole to win the election by selecting Palin..

I guess it's okay for Obama to throw out his friendships and advisements when it's politically expediant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obama has a piece of paper and a couple of years on a commitee, while John McCain has hands on experience. He served as a Naval Officer for 20+ years in several international posts, not to mention a combat post in Vietnam. McCain has also served on several committees, if that is an important qualification for you.

Fact of the matter is, Obama is the least qualified Presidential candidate in the last 100 years.

But if you feel he is worth the gamble, then by all means, take it.

I'm going with a proven leader, that has actually done what he says he will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And let's just throw in Keating Five which isn't one of those Obama like guilt by associations but a case of actual guilt on the part of McCain.

The one area in which I have definite respect for Obama supporters is in their ability to see the fault in their own candidate. I fail to see through the same vision of those McCain supporters who keep up this facade of perfection when it comes to McCain. It's difficult to face up to his faults and if that ever happens it will come with and this is what Obama did to try to negate it.

I'd rather have a discussion with people in which we may disagree on things but there is mutual respect than to have a pseudo debate with anyone who always has to be right, looks down upon my attempts tp keep up with his/her superior intelligence, has to play tit for tat (even with the wrong tat), and who is content to defend lies.

I commend all of you who have the patience to do what I cannot and I want to throw in how great it is that Barack Obama didn't change his name to fit into some mold that may have shielded him from it being used as an instrument of fear. Courage comes in many different forms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A piece of paper.

So I guess Sarah Palin has the same "piece of paper" that she went to 6 different colleges to get.

That was very dismissive of people who worked their asses off to get degrees in anything. Sarah Palin and Barack Obama included.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You saw that bullshit too, Redd?

I just shook my head. McCain voted against MLK's holiday, but Obama is the turncoat.

And what is the proof that Obama is endorsedby the Klan? What [!@#$%^&*] sense does that make? These folks sound like they hit that African Gungee '65 weed before they walked into the autotorium.

But, it's their constitutional right to protest, whether we agree or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sarah Palin is not a Presidential nominee...I am tired of comparing her to Obama..Let's compare Biden to Palin and Obama to McCain...

I know its easier to compare the Democratic presidential nominee to the Republican vice-presidential nominee, but that's not as it should be.

I have a degree in Political Science too...no lie...Should I be president?

Who has put up that notion??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
    • Another great episode.  GH has been pretty good this year, loading up the chamber, because now there's many bullets to fire, and another one was fired today when Nina found out Michael is the father of Sasha's baby.  I hope this secret comes out at the hearing.  I've also liked the slow burn with Gio/Emma. There's just so many things to look forward to on this show now.  GH is finally back to being really good. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy