Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 I am sure people would understand why SDs would go for Hillary if she is more formidable and why the SDs feel she should be at the top of the ticket and still vote....especially if she puts him on as VP. Remember that a lot of Obama supporters will go for McCain if he is not on the ticket. I think they need each other...they admire each other, like each other as friends, and odds are have a deal worked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 Some don't see it that way. They would rather ruin the party and give Hillary what she wants instead of thinking about the big picture. If she wouldn't have ran a bad campaign, and wouldn't have been so arrogant, and would be leading in all the categories, who could argue with giving her the nom? But she's not. She's behind and her campaign is broke. And the peson leading shouldn't get the nom? I mean, where is the logic in that? That would mean that no matter how the people voted in each state, it wouldn't matter, because the few in the back room would make the decision. How is that being a party of the people? I just want to know does every vote count.......or do only the votes count if your candidate is winning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 LOL you got a point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricaKane70 Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 ^^^^How in the world was I being negative, I responded to your posts, I thought we were having a civilized posts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 The one category that matters the most (all of them matter, of course) is who is more formidable against McCain and beating him by more..that is Hillary. I hope SDs look at that to make sure they vote for who can win it by more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 You were with saying all of this stuff about the SDs voting for the one in second place. They might as well if she is beating McCain by more than the first place one. I just saw it as negative, you did not...let's leave it there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 No problem with it at all. But when posters start heckling someone else for adoring Hilary...well it bugs the hell out of me. Seriously, so what if Hilary is losing...do you have to GLOAT over it every post ....DO YOU?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricaKane70 Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 Well I'm sorry if you saw it as negative. I still like hillary and I hope there is a way that she can be vp or president some day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 Good thing I didn't ask you if it bugged you or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 I see someone else saw it the way I did, hence why I wrote what I did...I have nothing against any posters here but don't start raining in on parades. I have never done that for Obama victories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 On that we agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 And Roman I wouldnt Gloat too much. There are reports Obama is in trouble if he cant get the right people to vote for him against McCain. So McCain might reign on your party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 It sounds like your argument changes depending on what is going on. Let me put it this way. You and a co-worker are up for a job. You both have 30 days to prove who is better, and whoever has the betternumbers gets the position. So, you come in on time, do your job and get the better numbers. Your co-worker comes in late every single day, slacks off and comes in second. But your other co-workers take a poll, and since they judge that he could be a better supervisor than you, he/she gets the position. Now, by your logic......that is fair, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 They said something about him having trouble with working class and senior citizens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DevotedToAMC Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 We are talking about being more formidable, not how one is more punctual and more professional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.