Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

His position on business specifically is that he will provide tax relief (eliminate all captial gains) to small business and start-ups that create jobs. And a $500 tax credit "Making Work Pay" for small business owners. This is clearly stated on BarackObama.com

There are a couple of policies that are very intriguing:

What do you think of these policies? Do you feel that companies doing alot of offshore hiring should not be penalized in any way? Especially when they are getting huge tax breaks in this country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Immigration is probably one of the most complex ethical issues out there right now. You know, my instinct just wants to say ship them out and be done but there's so much more involved. The labor force they provide is a needed commodity but then the reason they are so needed is because businesses avert the system to hire them and therefore aren't obligated to give them the minimum wage or any other employment benefit. I don't know how exactly I feel. I think immigrants get screwed because they have no employment protection but at the same time they can receive social program benefits even though there is no revenue from them to pay for it. Employers are fleecing the system. The workers are fleecing the system and consumers reap the benefits of it.

I guess bottom line is that I do not think criminal acts should be rewarded and illegal immigration is by definition a criminal act. Solving that is a whole other ball game. I can't criticize candidates for mixed messages here because I'm in the same boat with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Roman - I think the beef with him is that he's endorsed Democrats before, mostly because of social issues. He is pretty much right in line with the Republicans on other matters - fiscal, military, welfare. But he argues that the Republican party has shifted too much focus to social matters like gay marriage and abortion.

If someone feels differently, please jump in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I've seen and heard the statements about the capital gains tax. It is very misleading in that small business do not usually pay capital gains taxes. They do however, pay income and payroll taxes, which Obama will increase on those that bring in $250,000 or more, which many of them do.

That's exactly where I feel the double talk stands (the $500 tax credit/ per worker). How will that even make sense when he is going to raise income and corporate tax on business?

Personally, I dont feel that any American business should be punished. The intent of the tax breaks is to bring them back. Obama's plan (to raise their taxes) IMO will drive them further out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Crap. Now I have to go and look up the website where I saw these figures. Crap crap crap. Please excuse me because I'm going on memory here and I may have some of my information a little bit off. I have a brain like a steel sieve sometimes. UGH!

From one website the name of which I cannot remember it says that an analysis of McCain's voting record shows that the notorious 90% is a little bit misleading. If unanimous senate votes are discarded (which means items where not only McCain voted "with Bush" so did Biden, Clinton, Obama and everyone else in the Chamber) there is a 45% agreement rate. McCain and Bush disagree on immigration, campaign reform, judge appointments, budgetary items, and there were some other ones that are just not popping in my mind right now.

Aging is a horrible thing. I'll try to think of it to get the actual truth over here and you don't have to go on my word and piss-poor memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is how I feel. Obama has said that he will reward tax breaks to companies that either stay in the States or return to the States. The only businesses, from his word, that he said would get taxed are those that shut down and leave the U.S.

If that is the case, and your business outsourced your job.......why do they deserve a tax break?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great article on Obama's tax plan

"The big trick behind the Obama tax plan is that his refundable tax credits would primarily go precisely to those who pay little or nothing in federal income taxes. The latest CBO data shows the bottom 40% of income earners already pay no federal income taxes. Indeed, they receive a net payment from the federal income tax system, meaning from the taxpayers, equal to 3.8% of all federal income taxes, because of the refundable tax credits under current law. The middle 20% of income earners, the true middle class, pays 4.4% of federal income taxes. Overall, the bottom 60% of income earners pay less than 1% of federal income taxes on net."

"REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES should be trumpeting the fact that the results of Reaganomics over the past 30 years has been to abolish federal income taxes on the poor and the working class, and almost abolish them on the middle class. They should be emphasizing as well that another result of those tax policies is that the top 1% of income earners now pay 40% of all federal income taxes, and the top 10% now pay 71%, contrary to the foolish political propaganda of the neo-socialist class warriors. When Obama spouts that the rich need to pay their fair share, he should be asked what the heck is their fair share? 100%? 150%?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh. Ok. :)

It's just that if this is true, it will give me pause and I'll have to change my thinking on it.

But thanks for looking this up in the first place. :)

BTW, what is McCain's stance on taxing small businesses and corporations? Will he give tax breaks to all, even if they shut down and ship jobs overseas or out of the country, or will he tax certain bussinesses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy