Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Correct me if I'm wrong but did the timetable for a troop withdrawal become more of a likelihood because Obama pushed it as an issue and the country being occupied wants a timetable?

Since the Europeans don't care for Bush then McCain is unlikely to seem any different. They weren't interested in him when he went over there and he hasn't done anything fantastic since that will prompt them to change their minds. If he's elected then they'll be stuck with him and they'll deal as they do now.

To tack on to the executive experience discussion: the governor of any state that is prone to natural disaster will most likely develop emergency preparedness skills (good or bad). I live in a state prone to annual wildfires and the devastation from that is sometimes compounded with mudslides, if we have heavy rain in those areas. That's something with which any governor of this state has to deal.

Now I like the governor (maybe more for his movies than anything else) and I have no complaints about his job performance since I know this is tough state to manage and his best happens to be better than some of the others. He's tough, tough talking, charismatic, no nonsense, engaging, humorous and a host of other things and he's perfect at this level of government. I could even see him as a senator but not president (and it's not because he was born here). He might be engaging domestically but I don't see him as a world leader.....so all that experience doesn't make him ready for the world to me.

I stand by my opinon of McCain being hypocritical on the experience issue but it since it's McCain vs Obama then the quality of his 25.5 years of service are up against the quality of Obama's 3.5 years as a senator. And Joe Biden's vs. Palin's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That is a possibility but you have to keep in mind that it would not have been possible at all to even mention a time table had the surge not worked. Also keep in mind that Obama voted against the surge. It can be looked at as somewhat of a double-edged sword, If you give him credit for speaking out for a time table then you also have to note that he hurt his cause by voting against the surge.

That is possible as well, but I am of the belief that Europeans should not dictate our approach to foreign policy. They are nice to have on your side, but I would not allow them final say as to what we should do to protect ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This comparison would be a minefield, IMO. Reagan's idea of diplomacy was Iran-Contra. How is that something to aspire to be, or to be like? Arguably, beginning with his administration the divisive issues came to the forefront more so than in administrations prior to his. Reagan was a man that couldn't even utter the word "AIDS" until his second term.

This is what really really bothers me about Republicans, and why I have such a hard time understanding how they are a viable political party in today's United States. A party that blatantly supports making homosexuals second class citizens because of whom they sleep with. I have yet to understand how two women marrying or two men marrying has anything to do with anyone other than the people who make that commitment. Really, if you had a lesbian or gay couple next door to you, living together, how does that affect anyone else? Or the same couple that now are still living together, but now have a piece of paper making it "official"? This argument of "defense of marriage" is just beyond me.

In my honest opinion, the Republicans should get back to the constitution that they seem to love when appointing their own activist judges and read the part of ALL men being created equal. My impression of the party is that they have changed that to read "All straight, rich, Christian white men are created equal". Because they have done nothing to help anyone other than those in that statement. If there is something that they have done for the homeless, poor, minority, non-Christian or GLBT, then please fill me in. I would love to know what that is....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since I don't give believe in the occupation, the surge means nothing to me. Patting yourself on the back for something which was based on lies in the first place is mind boggling except if your reality is different on the issue. No Osama Bin Laden = no success. Unless Al Quaeda is now defunct the fact that they relocated is a geographical victory at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree the quality of their tenure should weigh more heavily than the number of years served. While Obama has had a shorter number of years in the US Senate, he has not really accomplished anything of substance. John McCain has.

I'm not a huge fan of Joe Biden basically because I disagree with him on the issues, but he has done a lot.

Sarah Palin, if you want to talk about quality, has been a very very good governor during her term. She turned a deficit into a surplus in only 1 year. She completely eradicated the status que of Alaska's leadership. She has created jobs and is doing wonders for their economy. Alaskans absolutely love her. (I'm sure you've seen her approval ratings) They are actually mad to be potentially losing her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The "surge" is just a nicer way (according to Bush's focus groups) to say "escalation". And you're right. The occupation - and it IS an occupation - is illegal. In every sense of the word. If another country would have behaved in this manner, they would have been put up before the World Court by now on war crimes charges.

Since McCain supports this occupation, he is no better than the criminals (the Bush Administration) that launched it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was speaking mainly about McCain's similarities with Reagan in relation to foreign policy. If you give Reagan credit for only Iran-Contra, who then to you credit with ending the 40+ year cold war?

I assume you are talking about recent years, you know that the party was founded to end slavery right?

In recent years republicans have held the idea to lessen the role of government in our lives (except for Bush). Although this seems cruel because it does leave some groups to deal with their issues at the state, local level, and private sector.

I do not like to be lumped in with being anti-homeless, anti-gay..or what have you. Simply because I do not feel it is the role of the federal government to step into these situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA with you on almost everything, even though there are some Republicans who don't care what people do in their private lives. But, I see what you are saying.......the Party as a whole seems to give off this narative that it is ok for them to legislate morals from the bench or branches of government, but then get caught in scandal and that is supposed to remain a private issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If religious groups see Palin who has no qualms about ridiculing community organizing (which in this case helped benefit people in dire need) as a great example of what they stand for then thank God I am not one of them. How anyone can preach to the masses Biblical principles and call themselves Christian while ignoring Jesus' greatest commandment "to love one another as I have loved you" and to basically ridicule the poor who Jesus loved, is a travesty.

Palin has every right to defend herself against attacks but if her way of doing it includes ridiculing significant service then I have no interest in her whatsoever. I may engage in discussion about her since she's part of the election discussion and I may defend any poor treatment of her as a fellow human being but that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know the very first comment that came out of the Obama camp was to downplay Palin's role as Mayor of Wasilla. Is this not the same thing? I guess it's ok to put down small town America if you are promising the world to them out of the other side of your mouth.

The impression I got last night from the questioning of a community organizer is ..what exactly is a community organizer? I dont really know of a specific definition for what that even is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Casey, I would like to clarify something. And I'm sorry if I offended you. You arguments for your party are compelling and you state them very eloquently. What I meant was that my impression of the Republican party's platform. I'm sure there are Republicans that are not biased against the groups I listed.

IMO, the beginnings of that started under Nixon when he went to China. Every administration after that one did some work to end the Cold War. Was Reagan part of that? Yes. Should he get all the credit? Absolutely not.

We are at complete opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to this issue. I don't believe the Republicans want to lessen the role of government in our lives and then, in the next breath, say that lesbians and gays cannot be married. Isn't that further government intrusiveness? Or how Edwin Mease in the 1980s had a gay couple arrested for having sex in their own home!

If they want to spend less money, fine. Spend less. But don't spend less here and then spend billions overseas in a war that is not justified. Imagine if just half of the money spent in Iraq was spent here on our citizens. Don't you think that alot of our problems would have been solved by now?

I just don't understand taking money from people who desperately need it just to put it in the hands of military contractors is the way to go. I just don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
    • Oh wow that’s pretty awesome! I wish I had  approached him but there was so many people 
    • In the current environment, while it's small, there is a crumb of good news: Apparently, San Antonio voted for a DEMOCRATIC mayor, Gina Ortiz, beating the "right-hand man" of Gov. Greg Abbott, former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5337199-gina-ortiz-jones-wins-san-antonio/
    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy