Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The press is definitely helping Obama, there is no question about it. Hillary was justified in saying the media is not looking at this objectively. As I said, Obama is running on a movement and the media loves to report something like that. If the media maybe were to report on this a little more objectively, perhaps more people would see what Obama puts forward in inspiration, he more than lacks on true substance and vision. That's just my opinion. I personally think its great he is getting people so energized and this campaign is getting more people energized *(ust look at the numbers coming out to vote in these primaries) but I truly don't think he is ready to be the president of the united states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

From MSNBC's First Read:

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro

Per the Toronto Globe and Mail, in a story that was the lead on the paper’s front page today, that call to the Canadian embassy was actually from the Clinton campaign, not Obama’s:

“Mr. [ian] Brodie, [PM Harper’s chief of staff], during the media lockup for the Feb. 26 budget, stopped to chat with several journalists, and was surrounded by a group from CTV. The conversation turned to the pledges to renegotiate the North American free-trade agreement made by the two Democratic contenders, Mr. Obama and New York Senator Hillary Clinton.

“Mr. Brodie, apparently seeking to play down the potential impact on Canada, told the reporters the threat was not serious, and that someone from Ms. Clinton's campaign had even contacted Canadian diplomats to tell them not to worry because the NAFTA threats were mostly political posturing. The Canadian Press cited an unnamed source last night as saying that several people overheard the remark.

“The news agency quoted that source as saying that Mr. Brodie said that someone from Ms. Clinton's campaign called and was ‘telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt.’

“The story was followed by CTV's Washington bureau chief, Tom Clark, who reported that the Obama campaign, not the Clinton's, had reassured Canadian diplomats.

“Mr. Clark cited unnamed Canadian sources in his initial report. There was no explanation last night for why Mr. Brodie was said to have referred to the Clinton campaign but the news report was about the Obama campaign.”

*** UPDATE *** The Clinton campaign responds: "Unlike the Obama campaign, we can and do flatly deny this report and urge the Canadian government to reveal the name of anyone they think they heard from. The Obama campaign has given a variety of misleading answers to the press and the public about its top economic adviser’s contacts with the Canadian government and should come clean about why they did so," writes campaign spokespman Phil Singer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Florida and Michigan knew they would be stripped of delegates because they held it so early. They didn't change it. If Hilary was ahead, Barrack was no where close to her, I bet it wouldn't be such a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they should because these two states are very important in the general election. We may wind up actually taking Florida away from the Republicans and Michigan is considered a swing state. Let's see who both of those states want as the nominee and play it from there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And now Hillary says she does not want a recount and won't accept a caucus.

This is after the truh of NAFTA cmes out, and the only thing her spokesman can do is compair Obama with Ken Starr.

And this is the person I'm supposed to back? She's worrid about answering the phone at 3am?

When she does answer it, whatis she going to say? I know.......

"Bill.......it's for you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there should be a revote, because I don't think obama put his name on the ballots of MI and FL because the states broke the rules and their delegates wouldn't count. Its only fair that they should do a re-vote. I don't know why hillary is against this I think she definantly would get FL, but I don't know about MI.

After reading about how much it would cost for the re-vote I don't think the states should do it, that money is better off spent somewhere else in need. An I was mistaken about FL, obama's name was on the ballot so imo that one should count. His name wasn't on the MI ballot so I think they should either leave it alone or give it hillary or shell out 10 million dollars. What I don't understand is if the government knew their voters votes weren't going to count why did they go ahead and hold primaries anyway? Didn't that waste taxpayers money? I can see why hillary doesn't want a re-vote, its a total of 366 delegates combined which would put her most likely in lead if they were counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care how much it costs...a re vote is a guarantee that people's voices are heard in these states...either tax payer dollars pay for it or the DNC

As for wasting taxpayer money, EK70, California did that in the recall election. They mailed out ballots that were inaccurate and hence had to issue out new ballots. So it is not foreign for a state to waste tax dollars over an election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care how much it costs...a re vote is a guarantee that people's voices are heard in these states...either tax payer dollars pay for it or the DNC

As for wasting taxpayer money, EK70, California did that in the recall election. They mailed out ballots that were inaccurate and hence had to issue out new ballots. So it is not foreign for a state to waste tax dollars over an election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now the clinotons are pushing for a clinton/obama ticket, with her as president and obama as vp. I'm not sure they should be pushing this at the moment considering he's beating her by over 100 delegates. I thnk they should of waited to see if she could take the lead and then push the ticket, it would of helped give her more momentum, pushing it now could backfire. An not that the clintons would ever do this :rolleyes::lol: , I think they are saying this now to gurantee that hillary gets VP just in case Obama wins the nom. They are pushing obama in the corner, because even if he does win he is gonna need hillary's supporters and they won't be thrilled if he doesn't pick her as his vp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited. And @errol said JHC is working in a nonproduction capacity at Y&R.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
    • That was one of the best grandslam finals.  Alcaraz comes all the way back down 2 sets to 0, and three match points in the 3rd set, to win it in a 5th set tie-break.  And the quality of play was excellent - so many great shots.  What a battle!
    • Indeed. I may try to watch it in full sometime, but not anytime soon... Mark played Sean Baxter for a few episodes when Courtney married Andy. Burke was either on Broadway or at OLTL at that time, I suppose.
    • Well, Josh was a horndog. LOL Yep. It was one of the first really weird things Reva did with her PPD. She became obsessed with the idea that Dylan and Sam should get married. Sam was only 17, and needed her parent's permission. Reva helped them leave town so they could go to a neighboring state where Sam was old enough. Ross, Billy and Josh stopped them, then Sam went to India to try and persaude Justin. Reva followed her and didn't tell Josh she was going. While Reva was gone, Josh advertised for nannies, and Harley applied. He ended up hiring someone else. But when Reva returned, she hired Harley because (in her weird mental state) she wanted someone she could trust with the kids (because she feared Josh was trying to get rid of her and that Vanessa wanted the children.). After Reva starts treatment, she asks Harley to stay until she's stronger because she's good with the kids. At the party, Reva starts going off the rails, insulting Justin and Josh hauls her to a private dining room to ask WTF. Reva starts confronting him about the "affair" with Vanessa, and he realizes she is weird. He locks her in the dining room and frees Mindy and Van from the ladies room (where Reva has locked them in). Van starts telling him that Reva attacked her and needs help.  Reva escapes out the window of the dining room and goes back to the party, climbs onto a table and starts a striptease. Josh gets her to stop, takes her home and after filling Ed in, decides to go to the doctor the next day. Reva then takes off and spends days running around town, coming on to a guy she thinks is Billy, Billy, Hamp, Frank and Roger.  Roger takes her to his apartment and takes nude pictures of her, which he tries to blackmail Billy with. He wants the deed to the land the Towers is on in exchange for them. (Billy had been left the deed by a sweet old lady who lost her home in the 5th street fire. Roger had stolen the deed from her before she died. After Roger took those pics of Reva, she saw him hide them, and took an envelope from the hiding place. She didn't realize she'd taken the deed and not the pictures.)  Anyway, Billy and Vanessa trick Roger into burning the pictures, claim the deed and at the Towers opening reveal that Billy owns the land and therefore the Towers. That's what led to Roger and Alex's breakup and Roger and Mindy's affair. Mark Lewis was on ATWT? 1986 is not a good year, storywise. No bueno. Muy no bueno.
    • All the time they spent trying to make viewers feel sorry for Chad only for him to not even last that long. I wonder if they knew Richard Burgi was going so quickly. You're right about Josie replacing Cheryl. On paper, this should have made sense, given all the ties Josie had to the canvas, but I did prefer Cheryl. There was something very synthetic about Alexandra Wilson.  I suppose even if she did have some fans they were just so used to getting rid of people left and right, so she was more collateral damage. As you said above I do wonder what the plans were for Peggy Lazarus. I think AWHP mentioned her once telling Peter that Peggy Lazarus wasn't her real name. Maybe she would have been another Carl moll... Rebecca Hollen never did get her due in her soap roles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy