You know, I have MAJOR problems with Rauch. He's arrogant, a misogynist, a tyrant EP, he favours camp, and fair judgement isn't his strongest suit.

Had Y&R still been headed by Bell writers, I could've handled Rauch as a consultant, but not now. History has shown that Rauch is only as strong as the writer's he's worked with. If they writers are weak and have very little vision, Rauch walks all over them, of course, the exception was Harding LeMay at AW in the 70's, Rauch's only true success story IMO. From a production stand point, Rauch is very good with sets, getting performances out of actors, but the lighting on his shows are HORRIBLY BRIGHT. I hope this isn't a prelude to Rauch getting the EP job at Y&R, and Y&R is known for dark lightening.

I know he's much older, but couldn't they have asked Harding LaMay to consult instead of Rauch?

I know he's much older, but couldn't they have asked Harding LaMay to consult instead of Rauch?

Harding is 86.

Consultancy is a sh*t job - you write tons of story bibles and all sorts of cr*p and no one ever uses your ideas.

So there's no point in bringing consultants and inflating even more the already terrible Y&R team.

Y&R:

- Natalie Minardi Slater last listed as Associate Head Writer on July 14 (don't worry, she'll be back)

- Marla Kanelos first listed as Associate Head Writer on July 15

- Hogan Sheffer first listed as Co-Head Writer on July 15

Y&R:

- Natalie Minardi Slater last listed as Associate Head Writer on July 14 (don't worry, she'll be back)

Of course she will...

Y&R:

- Natalie Minardi Slater last listed as Associate Head Writer on July 14 (don't worry, she'll be back)

Until I saw the part in parentheses, I was about to have a heart attack.

- Marla Kanelos first listed as Associate Head Writer on July 15

You know, her breakdowns weren't as bad as I expected them to be, she's done an OK job so far by me.

- Hogan Sheffer first listed as Co-Head Writer on July 15

Hmmm, I thought Maria said his contribution to the show would start airing in August.

Until I saw the part in parentheses, I was about to have a heart attack.

I was just about to rephrase my previous post: Sadly, she will.

Wait, is Natalie being demoted to just a regular breakdown writer or something?

Okay, so I guess that explains why the material starts being more interesting... hopefully this will turn into something good.

I was just about to rephrase my previous post: Sadly, she will.

At least she knows the show. There aren't a lot of old Y&R writers, and we don't need ALL newbies there.

Wait, is Natalie being demoted to just a regular breakdown writer or something?

Nope. Toups can tell you why she's "leaving".

At least she knows the show. There aren't a lot of old Y&R writers, and we don't need ALL newbies there.

Puhleeez!

Nope. Toups can tell you why she's "leaving".

The only way I see her leaving is if she joins Alden and the rest of her friends at B&B.

I think the only reason you hate Natalie is because she's Alden's protege.

Edited July 14, 200817 yr by Y&RWorldTurner

I meant, it's good to see that at least someone is still there. Even though we don't know exactly what part is Natalie contributing too.

Why is it that you hate her?

I think the only reason you hate Natalie is being she's Alden's protege.

I was thinking exactly the same thing.

The only way I see her leaving is if she joins Alden and the rest of her friends at B&B.

I think the only reason you hate Natalie is being she's Alden's protege.

She is still employed at Y&R, as far as I know, but she's on "vacation", sort of.

Edited July 14, 200817 yr by Sylph

Wait, is Natalie being demoted to just a regular breakdown writer or something?

No, no.

At least she knows the show. There aren't a lot of old Y&R writers, and we don't need ALL newbies there.

Yeah, she's one of the last remaining connection to the Bell world.... one of the last remaining Y&R 90's writer.

I think the only reason you hate Natalie is because she's Alden's protege.

Puhleeez! That makes no sense.

You, on the other hand, are the one who doesn't have valid reasons for liking her.

Puhleeez! That makes no sense.

You, on the other hand, are the one who doesn't have valid reasons for liking her.

I don't have to state my valid reasons for liking her, if you don't have to state your valid reasons for disliking her.