Jump to content

DAYS: Thursday


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

^^^

I understand your hesitance to get into it. I'm telling you, soaps are like a damn drug that's hard to kick. If it can continue to be written well on a consistent basis (as it has been IMO), then I think more fans like you, who have been alienated by the inconsistent writing, will return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Co-sign with Ryan! It is like a drug, Keith. And like a drug, I thought I had kicked that habit after Melaswen. I thought "No way in HELL am I getting back into a show which I have pretty much watched since 1987 but which now makes refried sh!t look like beluga caviar."

That is, until I tuned back in for John's death and was reconverted. And, believe me, I fought tooth and nail to avoid watching this show. I swore I would never tune back in again. Seriously, the quality of the writing and acting jumps off the screen. This is what GH wishes it was -- relevant, soapy, dramatic, a bit campy. And, finally, a death that means something, that actually hurts (even though I used to poke fun at Drake's Amazing Acting Eyebrow all the time -- thatafact!) and which has truly transformed the canvas.

BTW, Keith, so pleased to be posting with you again. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, thanks for hearing me out and not jumping down my throat for having contrary opinions. :) Not saying you do, just that some posters can get very protective of their faves and if you like somebody different, they just do not want to know and will not accept an explanation why.

I cannot help liking EJ either (even though I understand those who feel he has dominated too much airtime in recent months. Balance and an ensemble cast is always key, no?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eeek. Well, when you put it like that... :huh:

Am staying spoiler-free so I can enjoy the show. But, believe me, if they trot out SuperJohn from beyond the grave in a JER-type SL, then I will prob destroy my DVR in disgust. Plus, as you say, who knows what wacky jinks the scab writers may dream up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I'd be extremely upset if John were never really dead. I accepted it wholeheartedly for the SSK storyline just because it was so preposterous it HAD to be fake ... but not this. I'm just so over people dying and coming back, period. If you kill a character that important KEEP THEM DEAD. If they are brought back to life, it's like why even bother in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Angry Dante was hot; sorry, but I'm not going to pretend it wasn't awesome seeing Dominic Zamprogna act his ass off in a way that was not crying.
    • Thanks, interesting and so believable (no Lonatrat or Clones...)Instead of the Lewis family he should have made the Oil family Granger...even if the audience didn't remember that one off character it would have been interesting to tie it into the fictional GL world.
    • Dante needs stick removed from his butt
    • When you bring up what I like to call "Shapiro's Folly" you think Dano's acting choices mattered? I ask because I don't think so. As far as I could tell almost universally the ABC fans hated the very idea of her being on all 4 shows! And, BTW, the headwriters also hated it, at least according to comments made by Passanante. But, it is not hard to imagine that they'd feel that way. And, I agreed. If she wanted success she should have planted "Rae" on one & given up her idea of branding, or whatever it was that she was after.  
    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show? Don't feel bad. I am a major Cass fan & I don't remember him with Donna either, LOL! Can we say forgettable? And, yes, Lila was the most last minute of last minutes!!!! 
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy