Jump to content

DAYS: Why Drake and John?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I honestly can't see Hogan writing for Marlena, even if John is gone or not. I've seen nothing from him at all that indicates he has an interest in writing for her character at all.

Plus why does John have to be "gone" for him to write for her? That's crap and lazy writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm a longtime fan of this show, and the beauty of this death is that it can resonate for a very long time. It's not some small deal that we will forget in ten minutes. We aren't sitting here talking about Lauren's death a few eps ago. This is the first death to produce real drama in....well since Maggie in the killer storyline. This time though, I think there's not much doubt at all that he's dead. I think it may come back to haunt the show in the next few months. I think (despite the money issues) getting Wayne N. back as Roman could ease some pain.

Now, Dee is the heorine again. She's strong, independant, not relying on John to rescue her. More like the Marlena of old. Besides that though, I see no longterm benfits for the show. It's just good right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i couldnt disagree more.

Hogan has from the start talked how about his Marlena love and how she needs to add heart back into the show. I do agree that he wanted to kill John from the start but couldnt.

and this is soo far from lazy writing, IMO. Days in the past 2 weeks has been the most complex and thought out daytime drama on the air in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Hogan is going to stick to his word and write for Marlena either! This is the first piece of juicy material that she's been given in god knows how long, and probably the only good material she's going to have. After this, Marlena will be tossed aside while Hogan writes for the younger (and lame) characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i stand by this... this was a brilliant and great choice. killing john black, as long as he stays dead, is amazing, it was sudden. death is sudeen and does come out of nowehere. as for the no buildup, i like it that way because it is even more sudden. I dont think this was random or came from out of nowehere. I do belive this was hogans first story he wanted to tell but couldnt for whatever reasons. it is a great umbrella storyline that involved everyone on the show and can provide major long term storylines.

as for marlena, i think this does free up the char. i loved john and mar, but he always seemed to tie her down and make her a bore. i have wanted him gone for years now to free her up so im glad its finnaly happening.

but whatever, haters are gonna hate. because god forbid you actually like something on a soap opera in this day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I don't think it's a case of haters hating. Sure, I hate what they did to John, but I'm looking at it from the angle of what it will do to the ratings. We're all sticking around to watch the show even after the funeral and into the future. But I'm looking at where this show is one month from now, three months, six months... if the ratings take a turn down to about 1.3 or 1.4 -- where Passions was when it got canceled by NBC -- then you can argue killing John was indeed the straw that broke the camel's back.

I don't think we have to worry about ratings that low myself, but it depends on how many of the J/M crowd choose to abandon ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show could regret it in the not too distant future. Basically, HS tried to retire both Bo/Hope and John/Marlena at the same time - accounting probably for a lot of declining ratings (he lost Jack and Jen as well). With an aging soap watching population, this probably is an attempt to marginalize Marlena to matriarch status (replacing Alice in some way). OLTL tried to do that to Viki, and has finally been forced to hire a new love interest (very reluctantly, I suspect). No one wants to be told they're near retirement age, especially now as people are aging better and living longer. If (more likely when) they try another romantic pairing, there will be criticism because it won't live up to John Black/Marlena. Hogan will lose credibility if he 'resurrects' John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Reading a post like this just reminds me of how badly Matt and Missy got screwed. Posters casually include SN&MBE in the big six. But Matt and Missy were never treated like mega-stars. Except they were once the biggest stars on daytime. They were NOT comic relief. When they returned they deserved good character portrayal, good airtime and good story.

But the show just blew it. They had a couple of mega-characters and they just walked away from them. There was no reason for it. And, sadly, most posters here probably don't even know what I'm talking about.

Oh well....what might have been.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That makes so much sense!! Hogie wanted to write out John from last year. I think two things stopped him. 1) Corday at the last minute probably didn't have the balls to go through with it and was afraid of the ratings drop and fan backlash for destroying one of daytime's most popular couples 2) Hogie realized that this would probably make E.J. irredeemable since he was the one that would have been responsible.

Before John got shot, he and Marlena were very involved on the canvas. You saw them working together, trying to solve mysteries, banter back and forth, make love, in danger together, etc. People started to say how much they were enjoying Jarlena and that was the perfect setup to make sure John's death would have had more emotional impact. That was the time they planned to kill John until Corday saved him. Remember how Hogie kept saying that he wanted to make Marlena more realistic, independent, and as fiesty as she was years ago? They were also trying to win her an emmy. John's death is the way that he planned on accomplishing all of that! Drake knew John's time was up from back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it was a matter of not being able to write for Marlena outside of John. Its more of not being able to write for John outside of Marlena. When you think about it, what more can you write for that character? Everything has basically been done! He would have to be bumped down to a supporting character anyway. John has always been a lead character but it was only because he was paired with a lead actress, not because Drake had any sort of phenomenal acting skills. It is NOT a coincidence that Drake has never been nominated for ANY emmy award for ANYTHING he has done in the last 21 years. As much as I love John and Drake, he isn't the type of actor that can stand on his own. He needs to be paired with other people and then its hit or miss. Sometimes he's good, sometimes he's not. If they had to sacrifice John so that Marlena can be front and center again, then I have NO problem with that (and I am a big Jarlena fan, especially when JER wrote for them). Only Deidre can save the show right now(as she has numerous times in the past) and since she is the highest paid actress at DAYS, they had to cut out the highest paid actor so that Dee can get some more airtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Why didn't Steve respect Monica and Jeff's decision?  I get he's Jeff's father, and that's how it came out, but I don't like the ethics of the story. A stranger gets to make life or death decisions over a wife's demands?   I hope Monica secretly never forgave Steve's chauvinism.
    • Question: Jon-Michael Reed's review of 1977 is up in the retro soap section.  It includes a fleeting reference to comedic scenes between Jeanne Cooper and Julianna McCarthy regarding “Kay's would-be beau, Ralph the Plumber”.  Could someone please fill me in will more details? I forgot that Kay and Liz were friendly before Jill stole Kay's husband.  And the thought of Liz playing a comedic scene blows my mind, because I only recall her being dour both in demeanor and wardrobe.  
    • I said on Twitter on Friday when Leslie mentioned Chicago that perhaps she might be related to one of Anita's bandmates. Since we hardly know anything about Leslie's childhood background. In addition, Leslie said she grew up listening to The Articulettes….
    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy