Jump to content

AMC: Canadian TVG Online Interview with Estensten & Brown


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The plot to save ‘All My Children’

By Nelson Branco

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New headwriters Barbara Esensten and James Harmon Brown dish on recasting Babe, Dixie’s death, and creating a diverse canvas

Susan Lucci (Erica) faces big changes ahead on 'AMC'

When ABC fired its controversial All My Children headwriter Megan McTavish earlier this year in favour of dynamic writing duo and soap vets Barbara Esensten and James Harmon Brown, we were literally jumping up and down with glee and anticipation.

To say that watching McTavish’s plot-driven mess during the past four years was painful and arduous is putting it lightly — talk about torture!

New hope has arrived, and after TV Guide spoke with the new headwriters, we are almost certain that Esensten and Brown are the miracle AMC fans have been praying for.

As longtime fans of Pine Valley, this talented couple, who also penned a little show called Dynasty, know this genre – especially after helming such daytime serials as Port Charles, Guiding Light, The City and Loving.

Read on to find out what we can expect in Pine Valley in upcoming months. The best news? Vampires and murder mysteries, which were Esensten and Harmon staples in the past, need not apply!

TV Guide: Your work has only aired for a month or so, but it’s already evident that a new sheriff is in town! Why did you decide to return full-time to soaps and try to fix one of daytime’s most ruined shows?

Barbara Esensten: We weren’t totally missing soaps. [Laughs.] We were script editing for Days of Our Lives and quite frankly, we wouldn’t have returned to daytime in this capacity if it weren’t for AMC. It’s our show of choice as a viewer; we’ve been big fans over the decades.

TVG: What can we expect in Pine Valley under your reign? Clearly, you are returning the show to its roots and grounding it in reality.

BE: One of our big stories is Spike’s hearing impairment. Last month’s big event resulting in a car crash provided real consequences. If you just write big events without any impact, then you lose your audience because it’s not realistic. We’re really excited about bringing on Kassie DePaiva’s (Blair, One Life to Live) son JQ, who is deaf in real-life. We spoke to his parents — Kassie and James DePaiva (ex-Max, OLTL) — as well as JQ, who has had a cochlear implant, to learn everything we could about this affliction and how it affects a family. While we’re basing the show in reality, we’re also trying really hard to make the show fun and exciting to watch.

TVG: That’s good news! AMC has always been infamous for its sly humour.

James Harmon Brown: The relationship that’s building between JR and Ava will be comedic.

BE: We’re big fans of Jacob Young (JR), and we can see him doing a lot more humour than he’s done before. Tad, Krystal, and Adam will also provide a lot of laughs — they boast some of the best chemistry in daytime.

TVG: Do you have big plans for your marquis star, Susan Lucci (Erica)?

JHB: One of things that the car crash creates is a ripple effect that will affect the canvas for a long time. We’ll see Erica become more prominent in 2008, and her storyline will be linked to Greenlee and Spike going over the ravine. So yes, we plan on using Erica a lot more — and let’s face it, she’s a valuable resource. Erica and Jackson are very funny as well, but we’d also like to play Erica’s big heart. We have to work around Susan Lucci’s vacation time, but once she’s back at the end of this year, her big story will kick in. One of the reasons we wanted to do this show is because the characters are so well-defined, and so well-acted, that it’s an embarrassment of riches.

TVG: Fans are clamouring for the return of Julia Barr (ex-Brooke) and Eden Riegel (ex-Bianca). Will you be bringing back old favourties?

JHB: We’d love to have Bianca back on the show, but ultimately it’s Eden’s decision and we can’t recast her because she’s so defined as Bianca. We haven’t yet talked about specifically bringing people back from the past, but the show has a rich history.

BE: If we could, there are a couple of dead characters we’d like to bring back! But that train has left the station.

TVG: I assume we’re talking about one of McTavish’s biggest blunders — killing off Dixie after bringing her back from the dead only a year earlier!

BE: Frankly, yes!

JHB: We have a lot of respect for Megan McTavish — we’re not here to run anyone down. We’ve always thought long and hard before we killed off a core character, especially on these kind of shows, because if you’re going to do that you must get a big bang for your buck. And in my opinion, that didn’t happen when Dixie was killed off — so why do it? We would have never killed her off, but then again it’s easy to do Monday morning quarterbacking. Any time new writers take over a show, it’s clear the show is in some kind of trouble, which is why we are here. And we’ve been in the same situation [Megan] was in before.

TVG: It’s been reported that Alexa Havens (Babe) will more than likely be leaving the soap; any plans to recast?

BE: It’s out there that we will probably lose her, and it certainly isn’t our choice. However, we’re still writing the show as if she’s not leaving. If we should have to recast Babe, we’ll help the actor take over the part by writing specifically for the new actor like what we did with the Greenlee recast. We saw some little things in Sabine Singh (Greenlee), so we wrote for her accordingly, but you get into real trouble when you completely change the character for a recast. Luckily, Jim and I don’t have any trouble separating the actor from a character because the latter is really paramount in our eyes.

TVG: Will we be seeing a more diverse canvas?

BE: We’re bringing in a younger generation that will join Sean and Colby in a university/college campus that will help propel the show forward, but also allow us to cast more ethnically diverse characters. We won’t be playing them 24-7 right away; they’ll be introduced slowly. Some of the newcomers will have connections to established characters.

TVG: How about our beloved veterans; will they enjoy some more screen time?

BE: We love Joe Martin — and we plan on using him as much as we can. We adore his scenes with Tad, so expect backburner veterans to be used more often and more effectively because that’s a great way to bring back fan favourites without necessarily revamping your canvas.

JHB: Listen, we’d be foolish not to use the Erica’s and Adam’s – they are the most popular characters on the show. So why not use them as the main focus? Hopefully, we won’t have anyone on the backburner because our stories typically tend to have a lot of branches.

TVG I assume your mandate from ABC is …

JHB: Get the ratings up! [Laughs.]

BE: Make it good! [Laughs.]

JHB: The mandate we got from ABC was to take it back to its roots and what it represents to the audience historically, but also make it contemporary.

BE: We also want our characters to sound like themselves. For example, there was one scene recently that was beautifully written, but those words would have never come out of that character’s mouth. As a writer, you have to be careful not to fall in love with the words as much as the character themselves. As a writer, you must speak out the dialogue when you write it out — we’re not writing a novel; we’re writing for the ears and eyes, and that’s one of our top priorities.

TVG: Have you talked to AMC’s creator Agnes Nixon for her blessing and input?

JHB: Yes. We talked to Agnes for sure; we worked with her on Loving. She’s astonishing.

BE: She’s lovely! When she’s at a writer’s meeting she’s very quiet, but then unexpectedly, she’ll come up with a story gem that just wows all of us. She’s been very supportive even when we don’t agree, but she’s invaluable. She is Erica Kane.

TVG: As The World Turns is telling a love story between two gay male characters that has fans addicted. Things have changed in daytime. Is this the right time for writers to finally tell stories they want to?

JHB: Yes. It’s really about telling the right story in the right context. We’re committed to diversity in all areas — ethnic, sexually, etc. Now is the right time to tell real gay and lesbian storylines that five to 10 years ago you couldn’t.

BE: It would be great to bring on a gay character and not make the story about his homosexuality, for example. There are other issues gay people face everyday that has nothing to do with their homosexuality.

JHB: What’s great about the younger generation is that they’re colour-blind. I think we can learn something from prime time, which boasts a realistic canvas to write from. We need to explore those areas and not be afraid to write them realistically, as opposed to how they were written in the past.

Published: Thursday, August 23, 2007

http://entertainment1.sympatico.msn.ca/The...n_NB.htm?isfa=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I"m going to sit and wait and be optimistic with B&E. There going to have keep there word on everything they said and still come up with surprises to keep me as a viewer. I did like it when they said they wouldn't have killed Dixie off, but I hated it when they side stepped about Julia Barr and just talked about Eden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like the fact that they are going to bring diversity, give VETS more screentime and that Erica Kane will be getting a HUGE storyline in 2008! :D

Also I like the fact that they do have meeting with Agnes Nixion! She is a great writer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They probably think that Eden was so much amazing that no other person can play her. I must say I agree. Eden's done a good job, but if she doesn't return or can't return for a long time, recast will be needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also all this talk about diversity and no mention of the written off African American Characters. I am all for Sean and Lilly, but hell, Reggie is equally as important to Jack and he loved Erica, Kendall and Lilly no college/basketball camp BS justifies him not being there for his family. I hate the way the swing the invisible wand when it comes to their inability to write for ethnic characters. Here is a big clue, we have the same issues as everyone else in life, we do not need ethnic related topics which you can't write about, just write about first love, school, work, stress, anger, fear and other universal themes that we can identify with. Open up the Martin Attic and let out all the black characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I also wonder if it was considered controversial at the time to show a morally corrupt doctor?(another character troupe for Agnes Nixon, the upstanding male citizen who is hiding secrets back at home) Up until the early 1970s, prime-time would very rarely tell stories about the private lives of doctors, because advertisers tended to shy away from such content. @robbwolff -- so is this wrong that Ruth dated David before marrying Joe?  Dr. David Thornton is a fictional character from the ABC daytime soap opera All My Children, portrayed by Paul Gleason from 1976 to 1978.  He was introduced as a respected physician in Pine Valley, presenting himself as a widower to his colleagues at the hospital. This facade, however, concealed a darker truth: his wife, Edna Thornton, was alive, and he was leading a double life. David’s character is defined by manipulation and secrecy, as he maintained a carefully curated public image while engaging in deceitful and criminal behavior in his personal life. His relationships were marked by control and betrayal, particularly in his marriage to Edna and his romantic entanglements with other women. David’s charm and professional status allowed him to navigate Pine Valley’s social circles, but his actions revealed a calculating and ruthless nature. Career David was a doctor at Pine Valley Hospital, where he was well-regarded by his peers for his medical expertise. His professional life provided him with a veneer of respectability, which he exploited to mask his personal misdeeds. However, his career was not a central focus of his storyline; instead, it served as a backdrop to his personal schemes. His position at the hospital gave him access to resources, such as the drug digitalis, which he later used in his attempt to murder his wife. David’s professional life unraveled as his criminal actions came to light, tarnishing his reputation in the medical community. Personal Relationships and Family David’s family and romantic relationships were fraught with tension and deception, shaping much of his narrative arc: Edna Thornton (Wife): David was married to Edna Thornton, with whom he had a daughter, Dottie. To his colleagues, he claimed Edna was deceased, allowing him to pursue other relationships without suspicion. In reality, David was plotting to kill Edna, motivated by his desire to be free of her and possibly to gain financial or personal freedom. He began poisoning her with digitalis, a heart medication, which caused her to experience heart pains. Edna was unaware of David’s true intentions until after his death, when the truth about his poisoning scheme was revealed. Dottie Thornton (Daughter): David and Edna’s daughter, Dottie Thornton, was a significant character in All My Children. Portrayed by Dawn Marie Boyle (1977–1980) and later Tasia Valenza (1982–1986), Dottie was raised primarily by Edna. David’s neglectful and manipulative behavior extended to his daughter, as he showed little genuine care for her well-being. Dottie’s life was impacted by her father’s actions, particularly after his death, when Edna became a wealthy widow. Dottie later married Thaddeus “Tad” Martin in 1985, though their marriage ended in divorce in 1986, and she suffered the loss of an unborn child with Tad. Ruth Parker (Fiancée, 1976): David was engaged to Ruth Parker in 1976, furthering his pattern of deceit since he was still married to Edna. His engagement to Ruth, who was also involved with Jeff Martin, highlighted David’s willingness to manipulate romantic partners for his own gain. The engagement did not lead to marriage, as David’s true intentions and double life began to surface. Christina “Chris” Karras (Lover, 1978): In 1978, David began a romantic relationship with Dr. Christina “Chris” Karras, a fellow physician. This affair added another layer of complexity to his web of lies, as Chris was unaware of his marriage to Edna and his poisoning scheme. After David’s death, Chris was initially accused of his murder due to their relationship and her access to medical resources. However, Jeff Martin’s investigation cleared her name by proving David’s death was caused by his own actions. Parents: David’s parents are unnamed in the source material, and both are noted as deceased. No further details are provided about their influence on his life or their role in his backstory. Death David Thornton’s death in 1978 was a dramatic and fitting conclusion to his villainous arc, brought about by his own treachery. Intent on killing Edna to escape their marriage, David had been secretly administering digitalis to her, causing her heart issues. In a twist of fate, their daughter, Dottie, innocently switched Edna’s drink with David’s during one of his poisoning attempts. Unaware that the drink was laced with a lethal dose of digitalis, David consumed it and suffered a fatal heart attack. His death was initially investigated as a possible murder, with Chris Karras as the prime suspect due to her relationship with David and her medical knowledge. However, Dr. Jeff Martin conducted a toxicology screen on David’s body, which revealed that the digitalis poisoning was the cause of both Edna’s heart pains and David’s death. This evidence exonerated Chris and exposed David’s plan to kill his wife, cementing his legacy as a tragic and self-destructive figure. Impact and Legacy David Thornton’s storyline, though relatively short-lived (1976–1978), was impactful due to its intensity and the ripple effects on other characters. His death left Edna a wealthy widow, altering her and Dottie’s circumstances and setting the stage for further drama, including Edna’s manipulation by conman Ray Gardner. David’s actions also strained relationships among other Pine Valley residents, particularly through his engagement to Ruth Parker and affair with Chris Karras, which intersected with Jeff Martin’s storyline. His character exemplified the classic soap opera archetype of a charming yet duplicitous villain whose downfall is precipitated by his own hubris. Additional Notes Portrayal: Paul Gleason’s performance as David Thornton brought a compelling intensity to the role, making the character memorable despite his brief tenure. Gleason’s ability to portray both charm and menace suited David’s dual nature as a respected doctor and a scheming husband. Storyline Context: David’s arc occurred during the early years of All My Children, a period when the show focused on intricate personal dramas and moral dilemmas. His poisoning plot and double life were emblematic of the show’s penchant for high-stakes interpersonal conflict. Lack of Additional Family Details: Beyond Edna and Dottie, no other family members (such as siblings or extended relatives) are mentioned in the source material, limiting the scope of his familial connections. Conclusion Dr. David Thornton was a multifaceted antagonist in All My Children, whose life was marked by professional success, personal deception, and a fatal miscalculation. As a doctor, he wielded authority and respect, but his secret plan to murder his wife, Edna, revealed a cold and calculating core. His relationships with Edna, Dottie, Ruth Parker, and Chris Karras were defined by manipulation, and his death by accidental self-poisoning was a poetic end to his schemes. David’s legacy in Pine Valley lived on through Edna’s newfound wealth and Dottie’s subsequent storylines, making him a pivotal figure in the show’s early narrative. His story remains a classic example of soap opera drama, blending betrayal, tragedy, and retribution.
    • The only blonde I see is one of the actual women staring at first & then screaming & running later.  DAYS: Vivian's manservant Ivan is in a long curly red wig. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Y&R: long straight black wig is the actor Peter Barton whose character name I am blanking on.   
    • I very much liked office Cleary and the actress who portrayed her (as you say, Mary Peterson).  A shame her turn didn't evolve into a contract role.   BTW, does anyone know the timeframe/years that Betty Rae served as casting director?  If i understand correctly, she not only led the effort for contract roles, but also for shorter 13- and 26-week roles.  IMO, GL had LOTS of very well-casted, limited roles, too. I'm surprised the actors throughout the soap industry, and especially P&G actors, have not assembled a book or something similar, praising Rae.  Each actor could write a few paragraphs or a page of text describing his or her experience.
    • No. Ruth had an extramarital affair with David while married to Joe.
    • I'm not sure I agree with Bernstein's children on that. Bernstein's life and activism here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Bernstein#Social_activism_and_humanitarian_efforts
    • Thursday & Friday's episodes were excellent. The build-up was most definitely worth the wait (2 months). TMG, I can't give her enough accolades. AM, was also absolutely incredible. I think the fallout is going to have a ripple effect. The little clues that have been dropped,  hopefully, will weave seamlessly to reveal even bigger bombshells for the Dupree's and Martin.
    • Thanks, msn drives me nuts on the one hand but on the other hand their headlines appeal to me. And, I just don't do FoxNews.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy