Jump to content

AMC 1998 Episode Rankings Counts


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes, because Robin's Janet had plastic surgery to look like a brand new person. This was when AMC spent years reforming the character and adding layers to her. Then, of course, McTavish had to ruin it all by bringing Janet back in the form of Kate Collins and making it seem as if Janet had never reformed. :rolleyes:

I don't care if Kate Collins originated the role, Robin Mattson will ALWAYS be Janet to me. She was the Janet I loved, sympathized with, and watched for. She brought a whole new dimension to that character and AMC, during the divine Lorraine Broderick tenure, spent years trying to make that character normal. It's a shame that's all gone to hell...

And pyshcofan, Robin can play a good psycho/bitch, she's done it in many of her other soap roles. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Janet was fun, played by Robin and she could play crazy but nice as well..........

Jennifer Bassey as Marian has probaly never had so much to do like this year, same goes for Stuart & Opal.

Brooke was on more than Erica that also is something special, has it happened another year.

And if anyone knows who played Angela, Raquel Dion the newcomer who had a son with Mateo, her sister Angela.

"!!!!!!!!!!.........??????????"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah that's why I never bought the line that McT was behind Brooke having nothing to do--I think Fronz and co froze her out...

At the time many were mad cuz Broderick had been starting an Ester (was that her name?) stuart relationship but I think ultimately McT's pairing with Marian worked--one of her few big successes in that period

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was 1998 when Ryan was introduced?>>>>

Yes it was and it was one of few storylines McTavish did right that year (Ryan/Gillian). Her other successes were minimal but they were Adam/Liza, Stuart/Marian, Brooke's trial, Tad/Dixie, and if you want to count Hayley/Mateo not being married and Raquel's introduction then do it (I Found it a good story but bad timing since Hayley/Mateo had been tortured enough that year)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah they usually ignore that aspect. I just found an early proteus episode I had from when Passanante's stuff was still being finished (no HWers credited) and I forgot how infestedwith ghosts Pine Valley was--we had Jesse's ghost haunting Tad for no real reason offering him cryptic clues, Gillian's ghost had finally left, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

McT is random to a tee. I still think she got the idea from a Simpsons episode that aired around the same time :lol:

Grandpa Simpson and his troops founjd some Nazi art work and stole it.

It was very similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy