Jump to content

ALL: Writing for Daytime Television


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I see what you mean, but I also felt like PC(under Karen Harris. I feel the need to stress that, because no one remembers when PC was a well-written show) had slower building stories that came to a head during the story projections. I think the shorter/13 week stunts were mainly "hospital-related," like The Nurses Strike, Lucy and Rachel going toe-to-toe for the board seat, Claire Wright dying, Ian launching the clinic. The slower building stories, like Joe dealing with possibly being HIV +, Julie being Christina's real mother, Lucy breaking down, etc. took more time.

I do, however, feel like not seeing Karen's recovery from drugs the second time around was a HUGE copout.

I should also admit that I was a huge fan of Americanized Telenovelas, similar to MyNetworkTV. I do admit getting sucked into innovative ideas. But nothing beats a good, traditional soap opera. But I don't think we should reject new ideas either.

I was devastated upon learning MyNetworkTV no longer did the novelas, especially since it looked like they were getting better every cycle. Tatum O'Neal was not to be missed.

It's a shame really. This is a matter of opinion, but DAYS(under Reilly 1) was a good example of slow-bulding story arcs with good resolutions. Granted, he would place the character's back in the same situation they were in before, but at least the characters enjoyed a moment of bliss without the foil or the obstacles.

I assume you mean old Y&R, not new Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm sorry, but did you even WATCH PC when Karen Harris was HW in 2000?! Was probably the best and the most underrated soap of that year. Harris brought that show from the depths of hell with smart, witty dialogue, interesting storylines, and most importantly, allowed us to get to KNOW the people on the other side of Port Charles. It's a shame Harris's turnaround was sacked for the lousy, poorly written Dark Shadows clone it became following.

Karen Harris is to me what Jimmy Reilly is to Toups. Or what....wait...nevermind, I have no clue who your favorite writers are. You spend so much time criticizing other people's posts to even comment on what you like.

So, instead of getting into Message Board Bitchfight #5555, I challenge you to do something different for a change. Tell me who your favorite writers/HW are in daytime. You know, since you post on every single post that has to do with writing for a daytime serial.

Just go ahead and share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No. By then I was an AMC and GH fan.

I talk about a lot of what I like. As a matter of fact, I was accused of having some sort of connection to my favorite AMC scriptwriter Joanna Cohen because I praised her work.

Claire Labine

Lorraine Broderick

And after her insightful interview, Kay Alden.

I also enjoyed the much hated 2003 AMC head writing team of Gordon Rayfield and Anna Theresa Cascio.

Karen Harris can keep penning her homogenized GH scripts for all I care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay.

If I saw a Harris-scripted GH, I wouldn't know it because GH interests me that little lately.

I think Karen Harris wrote scripts for Lucy/Scott's breakup during the 2000 Nurses Ball when was working at PC(as Head-Writer). That was GREAT stuff, IMO.

You missed out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I, however, wasn't. (P. S. I'm well aware of your liaison with the American telenovelas, you+re one of those people whose posts I watch regularly. R Sinclair is one of those people, too.) I found ther pace quite interesting, but the whole plots, motivations and so on, quite unbelievable and shabby. They did a great job of adapting those horrid Cuban originals and made them as believable as they can be, but everything else is just - sh!t.

I'm not sure I'm happy they cancelled them altogether, sicne, maybe, there might have been a chance of making them more classy and literary.

I love the fact that great writers of daytime drama (they don't include Reilly for sure) had their own individual styles, Harding wrote one-act play everyday, Claire had a slower pace "scene-wise" than Bill Bell, Bill knew how to stretch the story ove two years and so on. Of course, they are/were great just because they were unique and didn't copy each other.

However, on the matter of half-hour soaps I'm not sure I have an opinion apart from the fact that I wouldn't like them all to be half hour. And I certainly don't like the 90-minute thing.

Yes, the new one is just a pice of cr*p.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The industry is changing. Whereas back in the day you were asked to submit a two-pages scene between protagonsist on a show, now you're more likely be invited to send original material and not spec scripts:

I'm sure R Sinclair, who submitted his material to AMC and got a flat-out rejection, can tell us what he submitted. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It doesn't surprise me for some reason.

I don't follow very many script/breakdown writers, but I do know one of Harris's many specialties at PC was character development and interaction. It almost seemed as though everything had a purpose and every character had motivations for the things they did instead of just throwing them on the wall(much like Lynn Marie Lethal and her partner-in-crime did at PC).

It would be a dream to have Karen Harris as GH's New Head-Writer, to see if lightining would strike twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wihs I had gone to this event, since it took place just a few miles away from me. Then again, I feel I would have been even more depressed about the state of soaps and the opportunities for new blood afterward. It's ridiculous how the industry insists on recycling the same hacks from show to show, network to network. Lots of people would love to step in and improve things, but they'll never get the chance, and those networks will get their wish of cheaper, reality based programming once we all finally tune out. I used to think I had what it took to write for a soap, and not just breakdowns, either. But who would hire me? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish I had gone to this event, since it took place just a few miles away from me. Then again, I feel I would have been even more depressed about the state of soaps and the opportunities for new blood afterward. It's ridiculous how the industry insists on recycling the same hacks from show to show, network to network. Lots of people would love to step in and improve things, but they'll never get the chance, and those networks will get their wish of cheaper, reality based programming once we all finally tune out. I used to think I had what it took to write for a soap, and not just breakdowns, either. But who would hire me? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: I don't know. I guess it was someone got their wish last night! "Star light, star bright, first star I see tonight. I wish I may, I wish I might, have R Sinclair SHUT THE FUCK UP TONIGHT!"

I do. I'm not saying she's a bad writer or anything, but it must be a "Karen" thing. Because I find Karen Lewis's scripts at AMC kind of blah too. As for GH, I love the three longtime script writers, Michele Val Jean (also a Labine protege who, in my opinion, transcends Harris in the script department), Mary Sue Price (who was my saving grace for GH during McTavish's 2001-2002 reign of terror) and Susan Wald. I'm even beginning to enjoy Tracey Thomson's work, too. Elizabeth Korte seems to always give her Sam-heavy episodes to write. It's like, whenever I see Thomson wrote the script, I know Sam's usually going to be driving story that day. Karen Harris seems to always write the Scrubs scripts, and I find them, coincidentally, kind of cute but boring. It's all in how you look at it, I guess. Over at AMC, some people are praising the work of Amanda L. Beall and how she's AMC's brightest hope and should've been promoted to head writer -- and unfortunately, I find her ego and voice are smeared all over her episodes (breakdown and/or script or BOTH since she's such hot shit! :rolleyes: ) -- so no matter which head writer she'd be working under, I'd still find her annoying. Some writers' literary voices are their voices, and it can't or won't change.

It was an original work, I provided a character breakdown and summary of the overall plot, and submitted a prologue and two acts. It came back to me about 2 weeks later with a form letter "Thank you for submitting your material. Unfortunately it is not what we are looking for at this time. Be assured your submission was given detailed attention. We are aware of the time and effort you put into this work. Best of luck in the future." And to add insult to injury, a gorgeous bold black stamp RETURNED was across the cover. That was back in 2001. Oh well. But it's all good because, now, I have no desire to aspire to work anywhere near daytime, with it being a formula-driven, network-controlled mess that it is. I'm moving more toward theater and screenplays, because there's more freedom to tell the stories I want to tell, which is what writing -- to me -- is all about. Now, I just sit back and love pontificating with all you kids about daytime writing. But yeah, man. Back in the early 00's, I was living, breathing, drinking, sleeping writing. I'm surprised I didn't make the WGA site my homepage during that time! :lol: LOVED me some Written By magazine articles!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • 6-6   Hmmmm. Not my favorite of the week. However, it showed the strength of Jazmen's script writing against RC's breakdown. And he's good enough to rise above almost all of RC's tics. Though I guess the real question would be would I have caught 'Carl' author thing if I had not heard it mentioned here?

      Please register in order to view this content

      I felt the stories moved and while there were situations, they weren't the slapsticky I would expect from a RC breakdown. Well-done, Jazmen.   I guess I liked it on a second viewing. I'm just sorry that outside of Bill's subplot and Chelesa's love life C plot, it did not continue the majority of the stories that were going on this week. I still liked what I got so I guess it was worth it for potential flow interruption. Though I have to note that Eva and Kat have been dancing around each other all week and since it is a by-product of the SilkPress storyline, I love how the story can be used separate from the main part of that plot, which kept this episode with a thread attached to the main stories of this week.   It has been a minute since I saw a situation where a character has to get into someone's room and it seems plausible. Of course, Kat has to use her family name. That said...those scenes did not seem implausible at all, but that could be my industry experience showing. Meanwhile, Eva and Tomas continue to grow closer. But even I had to side-eye when he finally declared his interest for Kat. Because it seem like he had been working hard to give mixed signals to Eva and Kat. And NOW he's devoted to Kat? And I am smh at Kat thinking Eva is the one who ran Laura off the road now. Just le sigh. BUT keeps their rivalry going if she accuses Eva and it turns out to be false. Eva will be looking for the payback. And she will be justified.   I know I'm in the minority, but I enjoyed the Doug/Vanessa/Joey scenes. I've mentioned it before, but of all the B stories, it was the only one that was given enough room to grow and had a build to it. And you could cut the tension in that room with a knife. Everyone gave a good performance. You could see the distance between Doug and Vanessa. And for all that drama...there still was more to play with the other shoe dropping of Doug finding out Vanessa and Joey slept together. Just juicy. Even if the end goal apparently seems to be money laundering.   Lord...Bill wasn't really even out of the hospital for an episode without having to go back in again, was he? lol. Good to see his separate story progressing.    Same for Chelesa and her love life. I'm not sure if Naomi is right. That said, I do like the cliffhanger of Mystery Woman being Bill's doctor. Not to mention Kat with the evidence. 
    • Speaking of 1986, YT recommended me some 1986 episodes revolving around Kyle/Reva/Maeve/Fletcher/Cain. What struck me most about the episodes is Zimmer seems at a loss. This does not feel like Reva at all. Was Kyle always such an a-hole? Why was the pairing so popular? He's so unlikeable, and Malloy's theatrical acting does not help matters. Jay Hammer is extremely charming as Fletcher--did they ever try Reva and Fletcher? The real star of these episodes is Leslie Denniston. When she tells Kyle she wants a divorce, it's a fantastic scene and Denniston is putting in some great work while the stuff around her is just weird and off-putting. 
    • The Day Of The Jackal author Frederick Forsyth dies
    • 6-5   Case in point...lol.   Kat and Jacob can soooo have a spinoff. Just watching her being adamant that Eva is up to no-good while Jacob continues to try to play straight man to the craziness continued to be a hoot to watch. And the sad part is that Kat is on the right trail, just following the wrong clues. Or worse coming to the wrong conclusion. All because of her dislike for Eva.    Meanwhile, Eva continued to make inroads. I know I have said this since the start of the show, but I love how for the most part, the writers write the characters in gray. Not completely white. Not completely black. Most of the characters have moments where they resonate with the audience and then have moments where they are unlikeable. Like technically, Eva should be a pariah. I like that she knows this, understands this, and still shows remorse and still tries to work to get back the lost trust. It makes her so rootable. And played by a star is a bonus.

      Please register in order to view this content

       It is also what makes the rivalry between Eva and Kat so much fun to watch. Also played by a star. Neither one is perfect really, but they are oh so watchable and a nice by-product of the SilkPress storyline.    Same for Anita. I love the regal coldness TT has given to the role. The sense of ruthlessness beneath the beautiful face. And yeah it can be a turn-off. And it's been nice to see a softer side to her throughout this story of her and her bandmates. She is far from perfect. She...is also NOT a doormat so it was great to watch her versus her bandmates this episode.    I like the run-in between NuTed and Nicole. I'm getting used to NuTed. And Nicole's presence has been a little too light for my liking. I can only assume that is to build to the next Nicole vs Silk Press Sheila confrontation which rumor has it will be another good one.    Speaking of which...LAURA IS OUT OF THE HOSPITAL!!!! Praise it be!!! And I thought it was so adorable that Nicole, Kat, and Mona were on hand to welcome her back. I liked that Laura has an open mind toward Eva (unlike her feelings toward SilkPress). Another layer to add to the Eva vs Kat rivalry. 
    • Victoria Principal clearly stacked her Dallas coins real good. In the grand scheme of things, she was smart to walk away from Dallas when she did.
    • When Robert Calhoun became EP I thought GL was finally hitting its stride after some pretty rough years. Unfortunately the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run did not reflect the quality of the show.
    • There was a five week break between the last Friday episode and the Thursday episodes which were the final four episodes. I have a feeling the final four episodes were refilmed to wrap up the storylines. 
    • Yes, I forgot there was a gap between his exit from GL and his start at ATWT. This almost makes me want to cry. He really turned ATWT around (and good for them). It would have been great if someone had done the same for GL. Can't imagine who. The Dobsons were doing Santa Barbara at this point. I mainly blame Kobe. She may not have been the worst EP they ever had, but she almost totally destroyed the Bauers and decimated much of the rest of the cast, sometimes for egotistical reasons. That was a huge mistake and made it that much harder for the show to recover.
    • Douglas Marland began at As the World Turns in September 1985 but it took about a year for his run to show growth in the ratings. 1986 As the World Turns becomes CBS's #2 daytime drama after Y&R.
    • This is not at all surprising. Watching the recently uploaded episodes, the uneveness is SO apparent. Characters are changing at the drop of a hat. The stories are close to incoherent. It's a mess, and we're only up to May. What a fall from grace. An Emmy-winning show with good ratings and within a few short years hitting possible cancelation territory.  I'm surprised CBS and/or P&G didn't try to do SOMETHING to restore its former glory. Was Marland still at ATWT at this point? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy