Jump to content

Primetime Overnights


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

‘Men in Trees’ climbs to a ratings high

The ABC dramedy averages a 3.9 in 18-49s

By Toni Fitzgerald

Jan 26, 2007

It took a few weeks, but audiences seem to be warming to “Men in Trees,” ABC’s romantic dramedy set in Alaska. Last night the Anne Heche show hit a series best in adults 18-49, building on the previous week and winning its Thursday timeslot in the demographic for the first time.

It’s still far from a hit, but it’s a promising sign for ABC, which already saw “Six Degrees” bomb in the important 10 p.m. post-“Grey’s Anatomy” timeslot earlier this season.

“Trees” averaged a 3.9 adults 18-49 rating, according to Nielsen overnights, 0.1 better than its then-record 3.8 when it debuted on Thursdays last year.

Granted, the gains against weak competition. NBC and CBS aired repeats, and “Trees” was just 0.1 ahead of the “Shark” rerun aired by the latter.

But for the show to experience growth after two months’ worth of episodes in the timeslot has to seem promising for ABC, whose strength on the night is with the women. TV Guide recently ran a feature calling “Men” the most romantic show on television, and the network has been marketing it as such, making it a much better fit on the night with the similarly themed “Ugly Betty” and “Grey’s” than “Degrees” ever was.

“Trees” is still fumbling more than half its “Grey’s” lead-in, which is never good. But ABC has promised to give the show time to find an audience in the timeslot, especially since it started off on Fridays and will take time for buzz to build for viewers coming in at midseason.

With this week’s season high in 18-49s coming a week after last week’s season best in 18-34s, there’s reason to believe that could happen.

Meanwhile, ABC continues to rule on Thursdays. “Grey’s” led the network to a first-place finish for the night among 18-49s with a 5.3 average rating and a 14 share. CBS was second at 4.6/12, NBC third at 2.7/7, Univision fourth at 1.7/5, and CW and Fox tied for fifth at 1.7/4.

Although it finished third for the night, NBC started the night in the lead with a 3.6 rating at 8 p.m. for repeats of “My Name is Earl” and “The Office.” ABC and CBS tied for second at 3.3, ABC for a repeat of “Ugly Betty” and CBS for a “CSI: Miami” rerun. That left Univision fourth with a 2.4 for “La Fea Mas Bella,” CW fifth with a 2.1 for “Smallville” and Fox sixth with a 1.9 for “Til Death” (2.0) and “The War at Home” (1.8).

ABC took the lead in a big way at 9 p.m. with an 8.8 rating for “Grey’s.” CBS was second with a season-low 6.6 for “CSI,” with NBC third with a 2.1 for repeats of “Scrubs” and “30 Rock” and Fox and Univision tied for fourth at 1.5, Fox for “The O.C.” and Univision for “Mundo de Fieras.” CW fell to sixth that hour with a 1.4 for “Supernatural.”

At 10 p.m. ABC led with a 3.9 for “Men in Trees.” CBS was a close second with a 3.8 for “Shark,” with NBC third with a 2.3 for an hour of “Office” repeats and Univision fourth with a 1.3 for “Aqui y Ahora.”

Among households, CBS led the night with a 10.1 average rating and a 16 share. ABC was second at 9.5/15, NBC third at 3.6/6, Fox fourth at 2.9/4, CW fifth at 2.5/4 and Univision sixth at 2.2/3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy