January 30, 200719 yr Member I couldn't find a date on this but I guess it was last year as Fergie has released the solo album now. It is from MambaOnline - http://www.mambaonline.com/article.asp?artid=671 I just found it interesting. And anyone that has seen the photos will find it interesting too. Fergie defends Josh's willy! Black Eyed Peas singer Fergie has come to the defence of her boyfriend's manhood. The guy in question is, of course, the absolutely gorgeous Josh Duhamel - best known in SA as the lead actor in the Las Vegas TV series. In an interview with British gay magazine, Attitude, the singer - who is promoting her solo debut CD - says that nude pictures of the hunk don't do him justice. The pictures of Josh were taken for a book by photographer Greg Gorman in 2000 and show the naked actor in all his glory (from various angles). “Trust me, he’s way more well endowed than that picture...” Fergie said, adding that, “He told me it was really cold in that room.” While we admit to being under-whelmed by his assets, he could well be a “grower”. In any case, Josh is so darn beautiful, that only the most demanding of size-queens would turn this hunk away. Click here to judge for yourself. ETA: Dumb silly me or blonde moment me. The date of the article is right at the top - December 13, 2006 - so not too old. Edited January 30, 200719 yr by SteveFrame
January 30, 200719 yr Member I have that nude picture of him in 2000, the front and back angles. He does look less endowed, but he's still hot.
January 30, 200719 yr Author Member I have that nude picture of him in 2000, the front and back angles. He does look less endowed, but he's still hot. I have seen the photos and have them too. And yes he is still hot. To me the back side and his chest are his greatest features. Even less endowed he is not that bad to me.
January 30, 200719 yr Member I think I'd be more horrified that my significant other was out there 'defending' my manhood more than anything else. I've seen the pictures, and it's not really bad at all....who cares anyway...he's smokin'! ETA: and Greg Gorman is one of my all time fav photographers, those photos kick ass! Edited January 30, 200719 yr by mateo22
January 30, 200719 yr Author Member There are several other angles of the frontal picture that I have seen in the past. These are the 3 shots I own and that are linked to by the article. Just a warning. They are nudes. http://www.youngdudez.com/photos/josh_duhamel_naked_1.jpg
January 30, 200719 yr Member There are several other angles of the frontal picture that I have seen in the past. These are the 3 shots I own and that are linked to by the article. Just a warning. They are nudes. http://www.youngdudez.com/photos/josh_duhamel_naked_1.jpg I have the top two photos.
January 31, 200719 yr Member Josh is hot enough that he doesn't need to be large down there. I'm just surprised that he's stupid enough and set his standards low enough to date Fergie!!! Edited January 31, 200719 yr by alwaysAMC
January 31, 200719 yr Author Member Josh is hot enough that he doesn't need to be large down there. I'm just surprised that he's stupid enough and set his standards low enough to date Fergie!!! Very well put. And Bellcurve to me his greatest feature is his butt. So you are right too.
February 1, 200719 yr Member How pathetic. I hate when girlfriends (or guyfriends for that matter) act so trashy and talk or defend their significant others' body parts. Is NOTHING sacred?!!
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.