Michael

Oh, interesting! So the 33-34 estimate would be right on the ball, then. Thanks for the info.

Oh wow. So he was at least originally conceived of as being in his mid-late 30s by the time the show premiered. Interesting.

I actually remember reading -- it might've been in that Lorraine Zenka coffee table book -- that Mickey was 33 when the show started. That seems like a random thing to include if it wasn't said on-air or included in the initial bible/character bios. I think the narrative was that he was 33 and was a bachelor, always dating beautiful women and whatnot, until Laura captured his heart or whatever. I had never really thought about it much, but Maggie was definitely in like her early 20s when they got together, so there was a decent age difference there. I do think if Maggie had been cut loose from the Horton fold in the early 80s, she would've gone the way of Liz, Don, Neil, and the like by the end of the decade. I guess her only chance at survival would have been if Melissa or Sarah had really taken off as solo characters and she'd gotten to stay around in the context of their mother (or if she'd had another kid by Don or someone who had done the same). But I don't think she would have become such a fixture the way she did in the 90s and 2000s -- she was a staple, even if she wasn't really given dramatic material.

What was also odd at that time was they had that Nikki Munson, who was a total miscast for Nikki but I think would've worked as Molly!

^ Whoa! Nice find. Thanks!

That's a fascinating (and blunt) article. Thanks for posting. Pat Falken-Smith's quote about the actors expecting too much is ridiculous, though.

^ Thanks for sharing!

God, she was so "good" (bad). I would love for them to give her a cameo for the 50th or something. KB's Philip was very foxy. And Shawn in that cage was very interesting viewing, even though the story was so awful.

What in the EVER-LOVING hell?!?!

Thanks, Jason!

I love that! Works really well, actually. Nicely done. I'm always confused on something: have Frank and Martha Evans EVER appeared onscreen?

It's interesting to think about that. Would a DH-Sandy have taken off the way Marlena did? They never would have done the evil twin story with DH as Sandy, and that was one of the things that really seemed to boost her into the stratosphere, right? (It was also one of the first larger-than-life plots for Days, it seems.) It's really surprising to me, looking back, that Marlena was never paired with any of the Horton men. Thanks for sharing! It's always fun to hear from people who actually remember this stuff. Amanda, for having been such a major character for a time, really seems like a forgotten bit of Days history. Yeah, I had no idea. I wonder what that's in reference to?!

Looking over that summary of viewer mail and the synopsis/treatment above, I have to wonder how the show felt to viewers at this time -- only eleven years after its very Horton-centric premiere, there are entire storylines involving people totally uninvolved with the Horton family. I know there was professional overlap with Neil and Marlena being doctors, etc., but it's very striking. I guess some of it was also the expansion to an hour, but the introduction of the Neil/Amanda stuff in particular always reads as very abrupt in storyline summaries. (And thank you all for sharing this stuff! It's so interesting to read, and I realize how lucky I am to be able to see it at all. You guys are awesome.)

It's actually weird to see how much he has (visually) aged since 2006. He's filled out a lot but looks great. He seemed soooo much younger when he started on Days.

Thanks for posting that article. Such a "The more things change, the more they stay the same..." thing.

That is seriously the most ridiculous wardrobe I have ever seen on any television show in history. It is a SHEER BLOUSE EXPOSING HER BRA and she is going to work and taking a family Christmas portrait.

Thanks for directing me to that. I rarely check the non-soap forums here.

I caught Anna Stuart on the news on James Cromwell's arm in a post-Oscar interview, I think entering one of the afterparties. She looks great.

Interesting way of breaking it down. 'Effete' is definitely a word I'd use to describe Tylo's Quint -- which, in these 80s episodes, I'm actually enjoying. He doesn't seem much like the other men at all (and the scenes with him and Tony are interesting for precisely that reason), more of a dreamer. I can certainly see how playing it more 'rugged' would play upon other aspects of the character.

Ah. Thanks! I watched the very end of GL, and even though the returnees had so little screentime, it seemed like their mere presence helped tie up a ton of loose ends.

Thanks for such a detailed response. I understand what you mean about Taylor. From what I've seen of his 80s run on Days and his primetime stuff, I get that he was pretty charismatic once upon a time. It's just hard for me to picture him as ever playing the Quint character that I'm watching on the GL DVDs right now (which I guess he didn't really do, haha). If it was a temp recast, the reasoning at least makes a bit more sense. So Nola and Quint just reunited offscreen after Brown was let go, too? What a mess.

I figured. Was it a pretty short-term thing just to wrap up Nola and Quint's disastrous return? How long was Michael Tylo around as Quint during all that? Why did the recast happen? (Sorry to pummel you with questions, but there's so much knowledge floating around this board and the DVDs have spurred a lot of curiosity in me!)

Uhhh... I just read that Josh Taylor (Roman on Days) played a recast Quint in 1997?! What the hell was that like?

Holy crap! Thank you for sharing, Matt!

Thanks! It actually had never occurred to me that both Fletcher and Holly reappeared at the end but never interacted.