janea4old

Sharon Case interview about the bipolar storyline and the Cameron Kirsten hallucinations https://www.soapoperadigest.com/content/exclusive-yrs-sharon-case-dishes-about-sharons-shocking-new-storyline/

On these interviews. the way he nods his head, and tilts his head, and moves his eyes, and laughs, etc. Just like Joshua. It's amazing.

Isaac Hayes III @IsaacHayes3 Once again, the estate and family of @isaachayes DID NOT approve the use of “Hold on I’m coming’” written by Isaac Hayes and David Porter by Donald Trump tonight in Atlanta. We and our partners at @primarywave are taking legal action to stop the unauthorized use of this song. Donald Trump represents the worst in honesty, integrity and class and want no association with his campaign of hate and racism.

Full statement from UAW here: https://uaw.org/uaw-endorses-kamala-harris-for-president-ahead-of-mass-rally-in-detroit/

https://soaphub.com/general-soap-operas/news-general-soap-operas/the-gates-coming-get-to-know-characters-creative-geniuses/ The soaphub article was written by Michael Maloney.

Thank you for bringing the point back, and for posting the implications, some of which I had been unaware until I read your post.

See spoiler thread: (Link)

as clarified by @wonderwoman1951, the cover in the tweet is "New York" magazine, which is the same company as "Vulture". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_(magazine) "New York" magazine is not "The New Yorker".

I agree, the problem is me, LOL. It's a new computer and I probably didn't set the browser up correctly. I shall attempt to find my error. Thanks again for posting all your clips!

Greg Vaughan ig stories July 30, 2024 The music playing in the background of these ig stories is "Something in the Orange" by Zach Bryan (lyrics are in the YT description)

Yes. A sense of humor is such a relief after living in fear. I mean of course we should be terrified of project 2025 and Tr*mp. But humor keeps life bearable, and allows us to remain functional and proactive. Instead of being paralyzed by fear.

source: https://www.tiktok.com/@ladychayil/video/7396751623453740330

Emma Samms has Long Covid and is quite disabled, based on everything she's said for the past few years. As in her past returns, I believe she can film a short arc. Or perhaps film a batch of episodes in a relatively short period of time, planned to air over a longer span of time.

well I'm in that same minority

Full fact sheet from the White House website on Biden's proposal for Supreme Court reform https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/07/29/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-bold-plan-to-reform-the-supreme-court-and-ensure-no-president-is-above-the-law/

Biden op-ed to Washington Post "My plan to reform the Supreme Court and ensure no president is above the law" https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/07/29/joe-biden-reform-supreme-court-presidential-immunity-plan-announcement/ https://archive.is/yCEMX Quote: By Joe Biden July 29, 2024 at 5:00 a.m. EDT The writer is president of the United States. This nation was founded on a simple yet profound principle: No one is above the law. Not the president of the United States. Not a justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. No one. But the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision on July 1 to grant presidents broad immunity from prosecution for crimes they commit in office means there are virtually no limits on what a president can do. The only limits will be those that are self-imposed by the person occupying the Oval Office. If a future president incites a violent mob to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power — like we saw on Jan. 6, 2021 — there may be no legal consequences. And that’s only the beginning. On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. Wade — the court is mired in a crisis of ethics. Scandals involving several justices have caused the public to question the court’s fairness and independence, which are essential to faithfully carrying out its mission of equal justice under the law. For example, undisclosed gifts to justices from individuals with interests in cases before the court, as well as conflicts of interest connected with Jan. 6 insurrectionists, raise legitimate questions about the court’s impartiality. I served as a U.S. senator for 36 years, including as chairman and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee. I have overseen more Supreme Court nominations as senator, vice president and president than anyone living today. I have great respect for our institutions and the separation of powers. What is happening now is not normal, and it undermines the public’s confidence in the court’s decisions, including those impacting personal freedoms. We now stand in a breach. That’s why — in the face of increasing threats to America’s democratic institutions — I am calling for three bold reforms to restore trust and accountability to the court and our democracy. First, I am calling for a constitutional amendment called the No One Is Above the Law Amendment. It would make clear that there is no immunity for crimes a former president committed while in office. I share our Founders’ belief that the president’s power is limited, not absolute. We are a nation of laws — not of kings or dictators. Second, we have had term limits for presidents for nearly 75 years. We should have the same for Supreme Court justices. The United States is the only major constitutional democracy that gives lifetime seats to its high court. Term limits would help ensure that the court’s membership changes with some regularity. That would make timing for court nominations more predictable and less arbitrary. It would reduce the chance that any single presidency radically alters the makeup of the court for generations to come. I support a system in which the president would appoint a justice every two years to spend 18 years in active service on the Supreme Court. Third, I’m calling for a binding code of conduct for the Supreme Court. This is common sense. The court’s current voluntary ethics code is weak and self-enforced. Justices should be required to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have financial or other conflicts of interest. Every other federal judge is bound by an enforceable code of conduct, and there is no reason for the Supreme Court to be exempt. All three of these reforms are supported by a majority of Americans — as well as conservative and liberal constitutional scholars. And I want to thank the bipartisan Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States for its insightful analysis, which informed some of these proposals. End quote

https://popular.info/p/a-comprehensive-guide-to-jd-vances