DAYS: Actor confirms exit
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Recent Posts
-
I'm finally playing some catch-up today and I know that I wanted to come back to your comment. Since at the start of the writing change, I was in here for that brief discussion of the popularity of Xander/Sarah. It was just starting when I stopped regularly watching, but I've read enough recaps and like the idea of good (if neurotic) girl/bad boy to know what I like. I knew it would be a hard sell given Xander's history, but I guess it's to the strength of the actor and actress (and how they look together) that I do like them. And the time jump I felt humanized Xander a little bit to give PT something to play with. I love LG from what I saw on B&B to be invested in neurotic Sarah as well as like her outside of the show due to her history and her romance with a certain Clueless actor at one point. So far from where I'm at...I'm loving their drama. I feel fully invested and they really work well together. Now the other one...I believe it's Johnny/Chanel. I'm missed soooooo much of their drama. And I like they are backing away from a baby which is such a RC thing. I hope for more realistic drama for them. I'm not invested...yet...but I'm intrigued. And Well...CB has that bubble. lol. It is nice to see a YOUNG soap couple though.
Please register in order to view this content
I also love this as well. Shelle has been together, apart, together, apart so much that at this point...I would love to get to know Belle and Shawn as they are right now separately before they inevitably get back together so that if/when they do, it MAKES SENSE. And I'm GLAD Belle is not with Phillip. I like Shawn with Jada so far. And EJ and Belle just screams messy. I didn't jump on during Sami's last visit so I expect when she shows up again, she will have some more words. The potential is just sooo good. -
By Liberty City · Posted
We are going to have to agree to disagree, because I completely disagree with your assessment.Please register in order to view this content
-
By DemetriKane · Posted
@Liberty City Being a more capable actor isn't always the better choice. He has no presence, no charisma. And, he does not come off like the leading man. @Rmodelboy You're right, Martin has stood up to him, and now I want Brandon recast too! Every guy on this show comes off as submissive. No, Vernon is all talk. Maurice's presence is for sure felt; that's why the first couple of episodes were dry this week. -
Given the cuts being made to treatment and research funding along with RFK Jr's quack theories about HIV/AIDS, it is probably more relevant than in some time, but I know GH is not going to really go there in explaining why (and I'm not sure they could have even back in the day). I guess I should be happy Disney has not decided mention of HIV and AIDS is too "woke" for them.
-
By dragonflies · Posted
Who's a bigger pathetic pick me? Brooke or Katie and Katie is a freaking moron given how Brooke has backstabbed her continually Ridge should have told patchwork girl to STHU -
By Liberty City · Posted
To me, it helps solidify Ted as a character; Johnson was stiff (except for his excessive swaying) and could not emote one iota in his scenes. It was a recast that was well done. Knowing what Robinson is capable of doing, he's an asset to the cast. If they've just established it as a soap opera that patients have watched prior, I doubt the characters would appear in-universe; that wouldn't make sense at all. -
Will I be Gio's champion? I am so there LOL I'm happy to know that so many people agree with me about how good his performance was at the NB. I don't see GM lasting any longer on GH than Nicholas Alexander Chavez did. Damn, I was struck by Sawandi's "moves." Rhythm Nation passed him by. At least he got in that head spin when he resorted to break dancing. But P.S. The guy is gorgeous. -- I understand all the criticism here about the Nurses Ball, and I pretty much agree with all of it. However, I love seeing it, and I miss it when we don't get it. I love the stuff that's so cheesy and bad that I can't believe I'm watching it, and I love trashing it. It's awesome television to snark at (see: Spinelli in his cowboy boots). Regardless of how slick it is or is supposed to be, it's clear A LOT of work is put into the final product, and I'm grateful when a soap is willing to pull out the stops like this. -- Haven't seen today's show yet, so stay tuned for more performance reviews LOL -- In the meantime, here's a decent look backstage at GH....a video improved greatly by the presence of Giovanni Mazza.
Please register in order to view this content
-
By DemetriKane · Posted
And what happens once the secret is out? He still walks around owning them? Nah, that's lame. The recast messes up Ted and Bill presence for me. -
Please register in order to view this content
I've always been convinced "Russel Kubeck" is Henry Slesar. There are 3 different mystery/suspense/crime writers whom I instantly identified as Henry Slesar after reading their works. Those three are "Sley Harson", "Eli Jerome", and "Russel Kubeck". Slesar's estate has subsequently verified that "Sley Harson" and "Eli Jerome" were indeed pen names used by Henry Slesar. No word yet on "Russel Kubeck". I wish Slesar's kids, his agent, or P&G would ultimately acknowledge whether or not "Kubeck" was one of Slesar's pen names. Here's what I think happened: I believe P&G approached Slesar and said, "We're pulling the plug on Somerset in December unless you can get the ratings up to a 6.0 for a 13-week period". [Or some other target they had in mind.] Slesar took the job but knew the chances of failure were far greater than the chances of success, so he used a pseudonym for it. Look at it this way. A few years later, in 1983, P&G dismissed Henry Slesar from The Edge of Night and went out soliciting a new mystery writer to take his place. They settled on Lee Sheldon. If "Russel Kubeck" were a real person (other than a pen name of Slesar's), don't you think P&G would've hired Kubeck instead, since they'd already worked with him on Somerset. I believe P&G was fully aware that the paychecks written in 1976 to Russel Kubeck had gone directly into Slesar's account, and there was no sense in interviewing Mr. Kubeck to take Slesar's place on EON in 1983.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.