Jump to content

ALL: General Retro Soap Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes, TPTB failed miserably with the recasting of Meg too.

Thinking of all the recasts as totally different characters was our only option, considering how drastically different the new interpretations of the characters were in the hands of the newbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 248
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think this was under Marland's watch, but I never thought of KMH as Emily Stewart even though she was in the role a lot longer than MS. Different show, but I felt the same about Jill on Y&R. I never thought of Jess Walton as Jill. I just thought of her as a different character. No matter how long she was on the show. 

Some people just personify a character perfectly and nobody can take their place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's why I said if he had cared. I know his history with soaps. Search for Tomorrow alone. 

I loved Melanie Smith's Emily enough to where I would have had a hard time accepting a recast, but I don't think Kelley was ever a good choice. She ticked boxes of vulnerability or sex appeal, but she lacked the heart. Her shadings tended to veer more toward pathetic and sleazy. Even just walking around A&M she gave porn star. Melanie's Emily was never that way, even when she was cheating and behaving badly.

Kelley had some good moments, especially during Emily/Hal, but she was never Emily to me.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you about KMH as Emily. I thought she was very limited as an actress and couldn't handle the material given to her. It was hard to warm to her Emily or be truly empathetic to the situations she'd get herself into.

On the subject of GL's Peapack days which were discussed previously, I still say they could've made that work. ATWT never looked the way GL did and at times GL did use the format to it's benefit and could deliver decent episodes. I feel like the main reason this didn't work is because it was too much of a learning curve and the people in charge weren't qualified to make it work.

 

If ever there was a time to bring in someone like Mal Young it was then. The shaky camera was a choice, a bad choice. So was the dreadful music, random scenes filmed in the middle of the woods and not adapting the writing to fit the new format. British soaps had already mastered that format and could've helped them do it the right way. 

They should've cut back the cast and built up a community feeling again. I remember Ellen Wheeler bragging about how they transformed their studio so they had a set for pretty much anything, even a nail salon. I feel like even that was a mistake. They were set up to fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think GL was also just done. The show was incredibly lucky to have lasted as long as it did. Ellen Wheeler probably was not the right choice to take that journey, but if they'd had another year, they could have made it work. I think some of the choices did work, just not enough, and I think GL at its core was a punchy show that could have benefited from a lo-fi look. Just not the one they got.

I'd still rather watch some of that last year again than most of what ATWT was putting out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, well, I was still a daily watcher of both, but If I ask myself which I preferred watching at that point, it's GL over ATWT. It's true, I believe that what GL needed at that point was a very extremely experienced EP & they only considered two candidates, both of whom were totally inexperienced as an EP. Directing, yes both trained & experienced. But, EP all they had was shadowing Goutman for some part of a year. Then of the two they picked EW & she was left to sink, swim, drown, I don't know walk on water? They wish, I guess. BTW, they here is P&G. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Disagree on ABC soaps. Disney bought ABC in July 1995. Disney CEO Michael Eisner was VP of Daytime in the 1970s and was a huge supporter of the soaps. The soaps on ABC made money in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The soaps' solid performances were cited in DIsney yearly reports to shareholders and I as a shareholder have the reports and read them. Disney integrated the soaps into the theme parks and had events and cruise trips. Disney made plenty of money from the soaps. In 2000 Disney created the SoapNet cable network that aired the ABC lineup plus Ryan's Hope and eventually Days and Restless. When DIsney canceled SoapNet in 2010 and was shifting over to Disney Junior that signaled the death of the ABC soaps. Purely business and money. Frons was the instrument that was used to execute Disney's plan. AMC gone in 2011. OLTL in 2012. Conversion to Disney Junior comlplete in June 2012. Purely business. GH will go eventually it is not a matter of if but when. Once Eisner left as CEO in 2005 the soaps lost their strongest supporter and the soaps were doomed.

Edited by JoeCool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True but ESPN was the jewel of the transaction and was undervalued at the time of the transaction. Eisner wanted ABC and ESPN so the deal worked. ABC's value to DIsney subsequently increased after the tranasction. Disney wanted the sports and ESPN then ABC. ABC and ESPN were linked. Eisner wanted them both. Eventually Disney's stock went up as well. 

Edited by JoeCool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC bought AMC and OLTL from Agnes Nixon for about $10 to $20 million in 1975. Those assets were paid bought and very profitable by the time DIsney purchased Cap. Cities/ABC.

Disney bought Caps Cities for primetime ABC and ESPN...the daytime shows on ABC were a bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Cap Cities bought ABC in 1985 the value of the transaction was $3 billion.

When Disney bought Cap Cities in 1995 the value of the transaction was $19 billion.

 

ABC Daytime was a drop in a huge bucket there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Haha that scarf thing did go on a bit too long, very odd. And what a young Rick!  I know this is an unpopular opinion, but I just never got the physical appeal of Grant Aleksander, but he's definitely a great actor. Who is the older lady around the 8:30 mark, and also ends the episode, alone and in pain? She seems like a really interesting character. I love the smoky voice and sultry, snaky vibe she seems to have.
    • I can't remember exactly but I think she lives in or is part of the cottage story with Carrie. Carrie poisons her in this episode.  I forgot Teresa was on the show. (I see that AI is insisting she wasn't - well they're wrong) Poor Maeve. I can how even she had her limits. 
    • It pisses me off that the other Duprees are making this incident all about them as well. They are playing a family of victims, acting as if Ted cheated on all of them. They should be supportive, but not like this. I have a family that makes anything that happens to me personally all about them, and seeing the same thing on TV is rage-inducing.
    • There are the makings of good Emmy reels in these past couple of episodes, but the industry is still going to favor even the most mediocre stories and performances on the older soaps. And with the pressure from the government over race I can see the academy shutting out Beyond The Gates to avoid criticism from the administration and the far right media.
    • oh, definitely! It's too bad she hit the start of a rough transition period for the show. She shines, but she's stuck with bad story and some (if not exactly bad) not great co-stars.  Uh, who did Maureen O'Sullivan play? (Sigh--and only if I'd understood exactly who and how wonderful Teresa Wright was in '86) God, the summer of '84 was literally one event after another. Kim's outfit alone must've been worth a small fortune. And poor Maeve. She looks so uncomfortable. Rebecca Hollen told a story on Locher Room where Maeve dropped the f-bomb during the shooting of it. For some reason, she wasn't being listened to, and had just had enough. As a producer, I would've been holding my breath as my pregnant actress kept walking around strange and undoubtably uneven sets in that long skirt.
    • Thanks. I'm glad we have some fan memories of these years as this is such a typically snide take on the genre. It's also poorly written and reminds me a great deal of the tedious "snark" recaps that became popular in the '90s. The end in particular. The 1979/80 stuff I have seen is much more polished than a number of soaps at the time. It was very easy to watch and not too bogged down in past story.  Margo is played by Ann Williams, who was on what seemed like every soap. I think she said Margo was her favorite role.  These episodes aren't consecutive, but if you ever have time, they are worth a watch. They are bits and pieces from January and April of 1979 - April in and out of prison, her past calling to her via her psychic powers (and the suicide of Miles' wife Denise, who had murder framing in mind). April 1979 has the end of Winter Austen (such a fantastic soap name).  I don't want to drop a ton of links but you can find playlists on Youtube.
    • And the rating 'wars' continue...hehe.
    • Well, it was fun while it lasted for Rebecca Herbst. Le sigh.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy