Jump to content

DAYS: January 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I'm of two minds on this issue.  Because while I think anyone would stare at Casey Moss if he was walking around in his drawers, there's something unempowering about gay characters always wanting what they cannot have.

Javi's young and cute.  He's got options other than the dude who just boffed his cousin.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That scream was awful and laughable. Johnny needs to be recast.

Casey Moss is sex on a stick. He looked really good today. I can see why Javi jaw dropped to the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What thought process did Carlivati go through to land on Johnny's "cheating" actually stopping before sex?

It's all soooooo low stakes, and I just don't get it. When you give Paulina the lines to show what we're all thinking, just what are you doing? The reveal was bad, but it makes everything we've seen to this point even more ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is that what's going on? They're wearing Calvins inside out? Surely there must be a no-name brand that they can wear correctly. It's not like it's that big of a deal (the guys are still hot), but that does explain the off feeling I get whenever I watch a DOOL underwear scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably because Ron is writing him as Leo 2.0. At least he doesn't have the baggage Leo does. If Javi is going to be written like Leo then we don't need Leo on the canvas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And for me, if Javi is going to be written like Leo, we don't need him on the canvas either. I hate the way RC turns gay guys into annoying caricatures.

Javi is cute as hell, but seeing him immediately thrown into bed with Leo was a real turn off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah… has there been any word on Twitter or somewhere about whether or not there was a change/rewrite in the Fake Rafe and the Johnny/Joy storylines? Because it really seems like it. Again, what would be the point to all this if this is the way it was always supposed to be?

I kinda felt bad for Johnny today though. He had no one to talk to about everything with Chanel but Leo?? Times like this make you wish that Tripp, Joey, Will, or somebody else in Johnny’s age group were still on the canvas lol 

I enjoyed the Javi/Jada scene, despite their conversation. They seem to work well together. And Javi looked hot in his first scene

Please register in order to view this content

Marlena and Belle was the best part of today. I’m glad we got some follow up about EJ and his reaction to Belle taking his job, but we needed more of it. That’s how you buildup a relationship/storyline. Marlena warning Belle to be careful was the right move. I hope she, and Shawn too continue to be a part of Belle’s storyline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy