Jump to content

GH: November 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So Aiden has basically already accepted that Lucky's going to leave? Aiden should be angry at his father. Where the drama here? Also, what the heck was the point in recasting if Aiden is going to continue to just pop in a couple of times a month?

This story with Trina and the jock feels WAY too cliche. I've seen this plot play out way better on other shows and movies. 

That ending with Danny yelling at Lucas was awful. That could have been set up so much better.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Miranda was a pretty large miss though lol.   Not only did Leslie Horan have no chemistry with Ingo, I can't imagine her being able to play a long lost Cassadine.   She must have had a great audition or something.  I can't believe GH fumbled such a critical casting like that.  I don't think a single viewer anywhere ever thought Jax would leave Brenda for that simpering, whiny woman. 

I also recall the show recasting Gina Cates and testing her with Jason, and that actress was also a big dud.  

I wonder what the original idea was for Alexis's backstory.  I think NLG was already cast and airing while Miranda was still on.  Of course I have no idea when the decision was made to dump the whole Miranda is a Cassadine story.  

I am one of the few people that really liked Alexis/Ned.  In the post-Lois era, I thought she was a nice fit for Ned.  The gatekeeping stuff was annoying mostly because it was self-appointed and no one really asked them to do it lol. 

Long post short, I can see where NLG is coming from, but I simply think the characterization of Alexis changed a lot post 2001 to make her much messier and sometimes pathetic.  I think @Vee said the character suffered a lot of humiliation and I would agree with that.  NLG has mostly kept Alexis's integrity and played her the best she could.  I can definitely see the confusion Nancy may have faced through the years trying to play some of Alexis's lesser moments, but I think there was always a character there.

P.S. @titan1978 I am so sorry for your loss!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what I can recall they were making it up on the fly. She was recurring at first, and they didn’t even name her as a Cassadine. Just a cousin, and I can’t remember if that was even established right away. Was she also secretly in love with Stefan before her full past was revealed? That was such a rough period on the show after years of good story.

And thank you.

Moving on to the show right now, I really wish Michael was taking a heel turn and gave us a little bit of Alan plotting against them. But as it stands too many people know right now to make that work. I did enjoy Jason kicking Drew’s ass more than I should. And Isaiah is making the chemistry rounds and so far he is promising as a performer, even if we don’t know much about the character yet.

Lucky is suffering from the same thing that has plagued Jason- his initial return story is over. Now what. They should already establish what he is doing for money, his relationships besides Liz, Aiden, and Laura. Like Dante, who could use a larger circle himself. Even his new pal Isaiah- there is history there and it’s just being left offscreen. Where is the story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am not sure if Alexis was in love with Stefan, but there was some sort of incestuous vibe there.  She was very jealous of the Katherine/Stefan relationship and I wasn't really clear why she teamed up with Luke to make it appear K/S were brother and sister.  1997 was a rough year lol.

This would absolutely be the right move for Michael.  He's been boring for far too long.  The show seems afraid for Michael to be anything but a hero, although given his chaotic upbringing and parents it makes so much sense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked them. But they did whine about their families for too long. I agree about Alexis.

She was, and those scenes where he banished her (and kissed her) were brilliant.

Chad only comes alive these days when he is turning dark. That's what they should let him do, just like in 2014. I would still recast him in time and after a break following this story because I think Duell is spent, but it's past time they let Michael loose.

The Lucky situation is so much the same problem this team/regime has with any major returning character that I can't attribute any of it to JJ, who has been putting in the work. These creatives just have no idea how to write this or any kind of nuanced issue other than reiterate the same points and retread the material until Frank says there is an opening in the taping schedule to start changing things up. I agree it's high time he makes a decision to stay, gets a job, etc. But even then they won't take the time for enough scenes digging into what got him here.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael Quartermaine should have never been a temporary thing; it was a nice turn for the character, and would have been a fantastic story: Carly, Jason & Sonny all tried keeping him from AJ & the Quartermaines, and in the end he chose them? Whew.... the story was there, and the "writer" ignored the fück out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael is essentially a full Q these days and has been since the early 2010s, when RC (and I think maybe someone prior) began moving him hard towards them and kept him heavy in their sphere and business. The only thing that hasn't stuck is the name.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly don't remember the exact turn but I guess it did begin then and to their credit Guza and Garin Wolf did play some of it, setting the table for a couple years as Michael began spending more and more time with the family and the business. But it was under RC that Michael became a permanent fixture at the Qs and ELQ, grew close to A.J., Ned and Tracy, etc. That's stuck, and I do think Chad has good chemistry with Jane especially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Perhaps Ned/Alexis were popular?  I just haven't really heard many people express their like for them.  They are mostly forgotten, but I would say it was probably Alexis's best pairing?  It got weird when they did the whole Eddie's Angels stuff though.

I actually didn't mind some of the Sexis material either and I know that's not popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what I remember it seem that way. Didn't someone call her out on it, too?

 

So did I. They should stay at odds since the writers don't want them to ever be in a truce. Given they both have kids with Sam, I expect them to really get into it with each other.

 

He really is. That smile as he was giving Molly the cupcake with the candle was swoonworthy. 

THIS.

Taste!! I come to love Steve, but I met SH as Stefan and perhaps my love of Wuthering Heights is showing, but I was smitten. I've never seen a character on a soap like him at that point and his intellect was just...Mmm.

I thought they were popular so I love it here, but it always surprises me to hear any dislike. Perhaps I related more because I was the 'gatekeeper' for my family growing up.

Please register in order to view this content

 

I remember Alexis having her crush on Sonny and how neurotic she was about it. But I had stopped watching when it actually happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy