Jump to content

DAYS: September 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I agree with @TEdgeofNightfrom this angle, either promote your show or don't, but to use an interview to air personal grievances, feels unprofessional. 

There are teams of people who rely on the production for their livelihood, and putting the popularity of your own story above the needs of others, feels like poor form.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always gotten the sense BF was arrogant, but moreso a few years ago.   He seems a bit more chill now, but I never forgot his social media rant about how great it was that both him and Marci Miller were nominated for Lead Actor/Actress and how rare that is for young people on Days.  Considering there are only four soaps left I wasn't that impressed.   IIRC, he really was defending MM and her haters and it was probably a nice gesture.  It just came off very arrogant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And where was his outrage when his female co-stars were being asked to take paycuts and being harassed?  If an actor feels that they have to complain to the press, at least make it about a larger issue than a temporary plot contrivance.  Because while he's blaming for the writer for not focusing on the character of Abby, did he ever consider whether his scene partner wanted to settle for less money than him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me, Tony Geary was just as offensive.  He literally became a star off the back of his 19-year-old co-star.  Yet, he never spoke out, over more than thirty years, about her mistreatment by production and the network.  The only times he came forward to speak his mind is when his middle-aged, balding, blowhard character lost his edge. 

Accepting the opinions of these hacks about the writing that has kept them employed long beyond their sell-by date, while their female costars are being under-compensated and harassed, is way off. 

And blaming the creativity of the writer, when the production could not accommodate the professional desires of Ms. Miller to go off contract, probably because she wasn't being paid the same rate as her male peers, feels like a selfish distortion of the truth. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's quite true that Tony Geary offended me. He had the audacity to object to their being stage directions in his scripts. To his way of thinking, he, the almighty actor that he seems to think he is, is the be-all and end-all, the absolute final arbiter of what he would be doing onscreen. Apparently the script should be the words he was to say, that alone, and NO MORE. And, of course, he is quick to point out that he negotiated to be able to change those very words, giving up money in favor of this creative autonomy. I could not help thinking what an amazing career soaps had afforded him and yet, he shows absolutely no appreciation for the genre in any way. He started out many years ago saying he hated soaps & apparently after a lifetime doing them & only them, he still despises them. As one who is an avid fan, I feel insulted. So if you ever find yourself in the position of writing a script for Mr. Geary, remember, do not tell him to move or to pick something up. Just words, please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fact that there are other stories that obviously help GH's ratings isn't really my point.  Tony Geary/Luke is just a much bigger actor/character than Billy Flynn/Chad #2.  I am not defending either of them.  I just think Tony Geary at least has enough experience and hardware to back up his opinions even if I don't agree with his takes.  Billy Flynn and Tony Geary will never be on the same level popularity or recognition wise.  It's just the way it is in 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
    • The Ted recast really is a shame because now they won't be able to do flashbacks to the best scenes the show has done to date.
    • That would be an AMAZING twist. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy