Jump to content

RIP: Producer Joseph Hardy Dies at 95


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I'd love to know that as well.  Didn't he also work on LOL and LIAMST?  And then, of course, there was that year he spent as Supervising Producer on KNOTS LANDING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the fact that he was there for that long doesn't necessarily mean that's where he made the greatest impact, especially if RH fans appear to agree that his time there was, for the most part, poor.

I'd love to know what, if any, positive impact he had on any show he produced, or whether he was just someone who was more suited to working in the theater.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was during KNOTS' abominable S13, with John Romano as Co-EP/Showrunner:

Please register in order to view this content

I suspect that it was Michael Filerman, who had worked at CBS Daytime (first, under Fred Silverman and maybe Paul Rauch; then, later, on his own, I think), who hired Hardy to perform a lot of the same duties that Lawrence Kasha - like Hardy, a theater veteran - had before his untimely death in 1990.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I doubt most of that was Hardy's fault but the changeover couldn't have helped. This helps explain why those last few seasons feel so different to me.

The best thing about season 13 remains their going back to the old opening credits music and style.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  Two things hurt KNOTS in S13: the fact that the Lechowicks and Stanleys had left the show in such a mess; and the fact that the team hired to replace them (Romano, James Magnuson, Donald Marcus, Rachel Cline, Lisa Seidman) had no prior knowledge of the show.  (IMO, Michael Filerman and David Jacobs were stupid not to guide Romano and his team at least initially, until they had learned how the show worked).

And you're right about Kasha's passing casting a bit of a shadow over the last few seasons of KNOTS.  IIRC, he died either right before the 1990-91 season or soon after it premiered, but they kept his name in the credits until the end of the season.  Either way, it does seem like the show began to spiral once he was no longer involved.  The latter half of S13 and most of S14 were improvements, but even they paled to "golden era" KNOTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


May he rest in peace, but it seemed anytime in the later years of the Lorimar sops when Filerman got personally involved everything turned to $#!+. See what happened to Falcon Crest’s Season 8, yikes. Filerman made some very reckless decisions and poor choices on both FC and Knots, and earlier on Flamingo Road (I think?). He was better off collecting a check and just doing his minimum oversight as did for so many years before getting personally involved. 
 

Filerman later apologized for some stuff in some interview with a fan club in the early ‘00’s, which was interesting and added some perspective. After Four Corners flopped badly I don’t think Filerman ever worked again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True.  Between his creative meddling on KL, FC, etc., and all the reports of his abusive behavior BTS, Michael Filerman was a producer who never knew when to leave things well enough alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed season 12 of Knots Landing and I felt like the finale was more the new writers coming to set things up. I could be wrong though. John Romano was all wrong for the show and recently when re-watching Party of Five, I noticed in the 5th season I was really struggling to connect with the show. I checked the credits and surprise surprise, John Romano was the new showrunner. That man does not know how to write a soap.

Edited by Chris B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes that was the season, and Romano was also heavily criticized for also trying make the Ned/Julia abusive relationship story look “sexy”.
 

The running joke online was the show went downhill after the cast’s Entertainment Weekly cover story in ‘97, but Romano’s tenure was the coffin nails like @Chris B had said.

Between the Knots and Party of Five stints Romano had been responsible for two very notorious flops, one being the disastrous Glenn Frey South of Sunset, the other being a failed David Caruso comeback drama made at the bottom depths of Caruso’s career. After Romano was fired at Party of Five, I don’t think he ever worked on anything significant ever again. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy