Jump to content

GH: Actor announces exit


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Vee is correct. I did say that I had been told that about Frank & these strong preferences he is said to have. (JJ for Lucky & JMB for Lulu) The other strong preference Frank supposedly has is to do with VM & that would be a story leading to ushering Sonny out. The thing is, I do not know if that means ushering Sonny out of the mob or out of the show. Is it a drastic change about the mob in PC or is it a simple retirement. At any rate, without a doubt if we hear that Vanessa has been hired we will know something is up! 

I agree but there might be a short-term bump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Relying on one actor's return to provide a sustained ratings bump is a fool's game. It's not going to happen. The only thing that has any hope of that is a larger systemic creative overhaul. Doesn't mean I can't be happy Jonathan Jackson is back, because he should be back so I am.

How many times have we said DAYS was off the air next year? And it's still here. So I am not predicting anything about GH's future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are often ABC's best show but more often second to The View. They regularly beat Today3, TodayHoda, GMA3, NBC News Daily & The Talk. On occasion they also beat The View. People watching on the app, on abc.com & on YouTubeTV are not counted. Often, on Hulu they are #4. AFAWK ABC/Disney does not have any show they could put on in their place. I look at these factors every week & I do not see imminent danger. Obviously we all could & do wish that they would do better. But, why do you think they can't succeed limping along this way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow I didn’t think he’d be gone so soon though the writing was certainly on the wall. I didn’t mind him as John on the show but these other characters were very forced and shouldn’t have stuck around as long as they did. Good luck to him but not sad he’s gone. They can off Chase next if we’re stuck with Violet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly where I stand too. Not to mention he isn’t some rando like Jagger or Jackie Templeton- JJ’s Lucky walks in the door with story to play on the show in 2024, and connections everywhere on the show right now.
 

I have no expectations that his return drives a huge ratings bump. But consistent story with characters being used that have been neglected for a decade might bring us easily back over 2 million a week.

It’s been over a decade of many GH characters languishing in supporting roles or in stories they should not be in while the likes of Nina, Nathan, Peter, Finn, Franco, Hayden, Kim Nero, Julia etc were brought in and placed in the center of stories with actual GH characters supporting them. I am ready for this change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's possible.  But I suspect that Frank was in no rush to GET JJ back until everyone BTS began panicking about the ratings, forcing Frank to make some maneuvers he otherwise wouldn't have made - such as cutting ME loose - in order to free up salary and space for JJ.

If Frank actually allows JPS to be written out for good, with no hope of redemption for Billy Joel, then I'll KNOW someone at ABC is holding Frank's ass to the fire.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Nathan Varni returned he announced that the priority was lapsed viewers. I think you can make a case that returns like Jason and now escalating, Lucky, are things that you could do to try to address just that. Of course, you can't just get them back. The writing has to make things happen. And no one character is going to have some remarkable impact on ratings but there's no reason to be dismissive of temporary bumps. We had one with Jason. We can have one with Lucky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They had no issue recasting Nikolas, or Jason for that matter. I think Geary leaving and FV/ABC not valuing Genie had more to do with no Lucky than just waiting for JJ. They used Liz to prop up his friends (twice), and had no issue dropping Francis until it bit them in the butt. That just says to me they thought that branch of Spencer characters was expendable. Maybe that’s too cynical but that’s where I am.

Maurice had a hand in DZ returning, and he’s barely been used compared to the other men in his age range.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy