Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Unless it is some shocking secret admission how much it means to him, yada yada...but then why fight to get her back. I hope they don't go with it was phoney all along===cause otherwise why would Luke have had to hire an actor to marry him/laura....tracy has an army of lawyers...she tried to divorce him a dozen times in the beginning but it was legally binding...he could say they never consummated it that nighti n vegas...but that is stupid by now.

And how was Scott Reeves taping with Luke/Tracy last Friday...unless they are only hostage for a week or so and break out.

  • Replies 30.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hookedongh

    6312

  • remos

    4086

  • Ms. Quartermaine

    3372

  • ILoveTracyQ

    1894

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

ARGH.... we are thinking this too much. I can't see the 'un-marrying' LuNacy at this point, because you're right.... Tracy would have been all over that in 2005. As for 2006 - regardless of what the LnL faithful want to pretend, Luke really didn't want to marry Laura. He was just not willing to upset her. I don't think that one would have made a difference because he wanted to be Mr. Tracy Quartermaine.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I wonder what shocking could Luke tell her? I'm gonna be positive about this. :)

Would it be him taking his marriage for granted and always a flirt?

Edited by funny1
  • Members
Posted (edited)

OH... I like yours so much better than mine. happy.gif

EDIT - maybe the 'fights to win Tracy back' has to do with her assumptions about Skye and Helena... nothing terribly serious at all

Edited by remos
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Maybe... Could something that is shocking could be telling her he has not philandered on her? And IA with her freakin out about thinking all those thoughts of Helena filling her head with Luke being with Skye. She trying to get her goat.

Edited by funny1
  • Members
Posted (edited)

look at the pics.. those are "trees" and "tree shadows" against the jail wall.

There are no trees in the windemere basement.

She is elsewhere --- greece or whatever.. but it's not port chuck. Those are palm tree type trees.

HATE the shocking b.s. I don't want to be shocked when it comes to those two.

My possibilities for "shocking."

- He loves her more than he ever loved Laura.

- He has NEVER cheated on her (but was a serial cheater with Laura).

- Laura calls him weekly from France asking to be reunited, and he turns her down every time.

- The sex is MUCH hotter with her than Laura.

Edited by LaineyBev714
  • Members
Posted (edited)

maybe his shocking reveal is that he is in love with his own son! LOL

Okay..I'm going to be positive today...I think it is either a) they were never legally married and that is why he is fighting to win her back which could be really good only in that now he can still want to remarry her and she can even have a prenup maybe proving to her once and for all that he is not after her money (even though she knows it deep down) or B) that he has never really cheated on her with all his talk, etc...

I am wondering if maybe luke rescues Tracy but helena takes them hostage again. I know they are at least together by first week in June.

In any event, this is what I am most happy about....Tracy is actually in a preview that is like the third listed on teh list where they are usually listed in order of importance at the time! There is no skye mentioned anywhere in that preview as her story seems to have gone by the wayside.

Oh and one more thing....those pics were from the week of the 24th when Helena is supposed to be revealing her secret plan to tracy on the 25th. I think today we will see Tracy with Thor maybe in the dungeon...cause Helena is in different clothes on the docks with lucky/nik this week today or tomorrow I think

Still wondering how luke/tracy are in scenes with Steve Webber coming up...unless they weren't captive too long.

I'm curious as to the exact wording of the preview...the SOD versions on SZ are often paraphrased to be just the gist...but sometimes there is a bit more to it...like the last time SID said something about Helena not just having a plan about the paternity ll2/niz stuff but other things as well. The other things as well part was not in the summarized version.

Edited by hookedongh
  • Members
Posted

If they aren't legally married then Luke has already proven to her that he loves her and is not about her money cause he's always come back to her. And if he wanted to leave her he could have left her many times whether it's with Laura or Holly, or Skye. And why would Luke wait so long to tell her that they weren't married if they weren't?

  • Members
Posted

It makes no sense at all...but who knows with this show and the way they forget about stuff!

In any case...just happy they have something going on I guess. Maybe it is that he never has cheated on her.

Guess we will find out soon enough...

Looking forward to today's show

  • Members
Posted

Considering it's their 5th anniversary, lets hope the 'never legally married' bit is our fears and not the show's. Maybe it's the they never consummated the first night and she wonders what other lies he's told.

While I agree that a non-marriage would possibly provide great story and a real romance from the top this time, it wouldn't jibe with so many other things that Luke has done.... but then again all of his tricks to STOP her from divorcing him might have included the parts where they weren't legally married in the first place and he didn't want her to find out. Personally I've always wondered how legal it was when the bride was so drunk she didn't remember the ceremony - in r/l that wouldn't be legal because you have to come to the alter of your own free will, not coerced.

Who cares in the long run because Luke loves Tracy completely and Tracy loves Luke. No matter what happens we have LuNacy and they HAVE been a couple for 5 years... still the longest on the current show.

I'm looking forward to what Luke has planned for today.... sad that Tracy won't be there to share it, but Luke does romantic really well when inspired.

  • Members
Posted

I would love to see her face when he tells her that they didn't sleep together their on the first night. Luke is a romantic at heart but I think he scales back because Tracy isn't into pda's. But he would alot more if she was.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
    • Just finished the Goldfinch. Read it in 4-5 days... and it's a huuuuge book. Well... I would rate the first 500 pages a solid 10 out of 10... but then the next 300 were kind of a letdown... so the overall impression is something like - 7/10. It's just very hard to give something a full 10 after reading A little life.  Still... loved it immensely and would probably re-read it in the future. There is a movie adaptation... starring Nicole Kidman... that I haven't seen. 
    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm honestly surprised Nikki and Victor have not divorced yet... maybe their brief opening of the marriage did something for them. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It reminded me of what the Pollocks got away with all the time on THE DOCTORS: long ass flashbacks that don't really add anything to the scene except time.  Because, if you remove the flashback, what's left?  Monica finishes packing Alan's suitcase.  The end. Oh, well.  At least I got to see a young Patricia Elliott (ex-Renee, OLTL) in that Aim toothpaste commercial (not to mention, a shirtless James O'Sullivan (ex-Jeff, AMC; ex-Pete, OLTL; ex-Jerry, SOMERSET) in the commercial for One-a-Day vitamins, lol).
    • Well, I can't help but think it would've been written different with CB still there
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy