Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Unless it is some shocking secret admission how much it means to him, yada yada...but then why fight to get her back. I hope they don't go with it was phoney all along===cause otherwise why would Luke have had to hire an actor to marry him/laura....tracy has an army of lawyers...she tried to divorce him a dozen times in the beginning but it was legally binding...he could say they never consummated it that nighti n vegas...but that is stupid by now.

And how was Scott Reeves taping with Luke/Tracy last Friday...unless they are only hostage for a week or so and break out.

  • Replies 30.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hookedongh

    6312

  • remos

    4086

  • Ms. Quartermaine

    3372

  • ILoveTracyQ

    1894

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

ARGH.... we are thinking this too much. I can't see the 'un-marrying' LuNacy at this point, because you're right.... Tracy would have been all over that in 2005. As for 2006 - regardless of what the LnL faithful want to pretend, Luke really didn't want to marry Laura. He was just not willing to upset her. I don't think that one would have made a difference because he wanted to be Mr. Tracy Quartermaine.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I wonder what shocking could Luke tell her? I'm gonna be positive about this. :)

Would it be him taking his marriage for granted and always a flirt?

Edited by funny1
  • Members
Posted (edited)

OH... I like yours so much better than mine. happy.gif

EDIT - maybe the 'fights to win Tracy back' has to do with her assumptions about Skye and Helena... nothing terribly serious at all

Edited by remos
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Maybe... Could something that is shocking could be telling her he has not philandered on her? And IA with her freakin out about thinking all those thoughts of Helena filling her head with Luke being with Skye. She trying to get her goat.

Edited by funny1
  • Members
Posted (edited)

look at the pics.. those are "trees" and "tree shadows" against the jail wall.

There are no trees in the windemere basement.

She is elsewhere --- greece or whatever.. but it's not port chuck. Those are palm tree type trees.

HATE the shocking b.s. I don't want to be shocked when it comes to those two.

My possibilities for "shocking."

- He loves her more than he ever loved Laura.

- He has NEVER cheated on her (but was a serial cheater with Laura).

- Laura calls him weekly from France asking to be reunited, and he turns her down every time.

- The sex is MUCH hotter with her than Laura.

Edited by LaineyBev714
  • Members
Posted (edited)

maybe his shocking reveal is that he is in love with his own son! LOL

Okay..I'm going to be positive today...I think it is either a) they were never legally married and that is why he is fighting to win her back which could be really good only in that now he can still want to remarry her and she can even have a prenup maybe proving to her once and for all that he is not after her money (even though she knows it deep down) or B) that he has never really cheated on her with all his talk, etc...

I am wondering if maybe luke rescues Tracy but helena takes them hostage again. I know they are at least together by first week in June.

In any event, this is what I am most happy about....Tracy is actually in a preview that is like the third listed on teh list where they are usually listed in order of importance at the time! There is no skye mentioned anywhere in that preview as her story seems to have gone by the wayside.

Oh and one more thing....those pics were from the week of the 24th when Helena is supposed to be revealing her secret plan to tracy on the 25th. I think today we will see Tracy with Thor maybe in the dungeon...cause Helena is in different clothes on the docks with lucky/nik this week today or tomorrow I think

Still wondering how luke/tracy are in scenes with Steve Webber coming up...unless they weren't captive too long.

I'm curious as to the exact wording of the preview...the SOD versions on SZ are often paraphrased to be just the gist...but sometimes there is a bit more to it...like the last time SID said something about Helena not just having a plan about the paternity ll2/niz stuff but other things as well. The other things as well part was not in the summarized version.

Edited by hookedongh
  • Members
Posted

If they aren't legally married then Luke has already proven to her that he loves her and is not about her money cause he's always come back to her. And if he wanted to leave her he could have left her many times whether it's with Laura or Holly, or Skye. And why would Luke wait so long to tell her that they weren't married if they weren't?

  • Members
Posted

It makes no sense at all...but who knows with this show and the way they forget about stuff!

In any case...just happy they have something going on I guess. Maybe it is that he never has cheated on her.

Guess we will find out soon enough...

Looking forward to today's show

  • Members
Posted

Considering it's their 5th anniversary, lets hope the 'never legally married' bit is our fears and not the show's. Maybe it's the they never consummated the first night and she wonders what other lies he's told.

While I agree that a non-marriage would possibly provide great story and a real romance from the top this time, it wouldn't jibe with so many other things that Luke has done.... but then again all of his tricks to STOP her from divorcing him might have included the parts where they weren't legally married in the first place and he didn't want her to find out. Personally I've always wondered how legal it was when the bride was so drunk she didn't remember the ceremony - in r/l that wouldn't be legal because you have to come to the alter of your own free will, not coerced.

Who cares in the long run because Luke loves Tracy completely and Tracy loves Luke. No matter what happens we have LuNacy and they HAVE been a couple for 5 years... still the longest on the current show.

I'm looking forward to what Luke has planned for today.... sad that Tracy won't be there to share it, but Luke does romantic really well when inspired.

  • Members
Posted

I would love to see her face when he tells her that they didn't sleep together their on the first night. Luke is a romantic at heart but I think he scales back because Tracy isn't into pda's. But he would alot more if she was.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy