Jump to content

ALL: Errors, Myths, Omissions & Firsts that weren't


Recommended Posts

  • Members

some interesting soap connections in that episode:

the physician who performed the abortions was played by judson laire, who was on both love is a many splendored thing and as the world turns;

kathleen widdoes (another world and ‘world turns) played the young woman who had the abortion;

augusta dabney (too many soaps to list) was also in the cast. 

also remember that episode being featured in a mad men episode. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I've come to believe that individuals claiming "soap opera firsts" really need to distinguish between radio soap operas and television soap operas.  Or at least indicate which they are referring to.  Because several supposed "firsts" on television soaps actually occurred years earlier on radio soaps.  This is often totally ignored.  And since radio soaps and television soaps are actually the same genre, I believe it should be indicated (radio or television, or both).  Otherwise the "first" might be historically inaccurate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll give an example of what I mean:  In an earlier post in this thread, someone stated that Another World had the first soap opera spin-off (Somerset, 1970).  Our fellow poster, Countess Donnatella, corrected that statement by mentioning that Guiding Light had a spin-off decades earlier on radio.   So the truth is -- Guiding Light had the first soap opera spin-off.  And Another World had the first television soap opera spin-off.   

To simply state that Another World had the first soap opera spin-off is historically inaccurate.  

So when we research and publish soap opera firsts, we need to remember the radio days too.  Or at least make clear we are only talking about television soaps.  There are incredible inaccuracies in most lists of soap opera firsts, and many have been published in books as well as online. At least some of these inaccuracies could be cleared-up by merely using the term "television soap opera" rather than simply "soap opera."   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I find also in writing about these subjects, I employ adjectives, qualifiers like "US daytime" or "primetime" or "English-speaking" ... and that is because I deal with fans of US daytime, US primetime, British & Australian soaps. Words help. And, you are making an important point! 

Also, in a blog of mine I write: We did not start from scratch & create the TV soap. No, first came the radio soap. That began in the ’30s and lasted well through the ’50s with overlap while radio & TV both were airing soaps. GL even aired the same basic script in the morning for radio & down the block to another building, for the TV version in the afternoon. When people first came up with the idea for TV soaps there was fear that they wouldn’t work. They were new & the status quo was very successful. As it turned out the new type of soap was even more successful than the original, which is saying quite a lot. Irna Phillips was the mother of the radio soap & so she also became the mother of the TV soap. The TV soap definitely owes a debt of gratitude to the radio soap & the creators of the new medium definitely stood on the shoulders of the original medium.

I realize this is going further than what you are saying. 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Santa Barbara, Bridget & Jerome Dobson, New World & NBC, the issue, the lockout, the lawsuits & the impact on the show. 

Wesley Hyatt Ency of Daytime: 

Wikipedia entry for the show

Wikipedia The Dobsons 

Fandom wiki Santa Barbara

SOD 

Michael Fairman

LA Times

So, we know that Chuck Pratt is wrong & Anne Howard Bailey is correct. Some sources say the lock out began Oct. 1, 1987. Most say 1988. I distinctly remember that New World settled first and NBC let it drag on some but I couldn't find actual dates for either of the two settlements. We further know that the Dobsons won & they were paid an unknown of money. We also have this quote from Bridget from an interview, "It was impossible for Anne Howard Bailey to get inside my head, and I could not get in her head. She has a darker view of life than I do; I think she thinks of me as Pollyanna, and I think of her as Darth Vader." - Bridget Dobson, about SB

Edited by Contessa Donatella
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

THE ROAD OF LIFE from 12-13-1954 to 7-1-1955. But this soap had been on radio & very popular from as far back as 1937. Then in 1954 P&G suggested to Irna Phillips that she develop this project for television & P&G would sponsor it. 

What I am wondering is if this by any chance happens to be the first example of a TV soap that was sponsor-owned? Do we know of one before 12-13-1954?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From Eddie Drueding, in regard to things posted here: 

@Paul Raven

Marie Wallaces character on Dark Shadows had twins in 1968 (during the 1897 flashback)

Twins Shula and Kenton Archer were born in August 1958 on the BBC Radio 4 soap “The Archers.”

Looking at UK soaps twins Peter and Susan were born in 1965 on Coronation Street.

 

In fact, it wasn’t until 1962 that one — A Brighter Day — signed an African-American actor to a contract role. Unfortunately, Rex Ingram didn’t have long to make an impact as minister Victor Graham: Two weeks later, CBS cancelled the soap.

@Mona Kane Croft

Delineating radio soap, television soap (or TV soap) he agrees & adds that delineating US rather than British soap, as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Although P&G sponsored THE ROAD OF LIFE on television, and may have even produced it, that does not necessarily mean P&G owned the show.  Here is why I say that:

It is not well known, but in the early days of television soaps, P&G was the majority sponsor of some soaps without actually owning them.  For example, there is evidence in writing (which I do not currently have) that Irna Phillips owned Another World for at least a few years, while P&G both produced it (for Irna) and was the majority sponsor.  Eventually Irna sold AW outright to P&G Productions.   So it is likely that Irna may have initially owned other TV soaps (and perhaps even radio soaps) that she had created, while P&G served as producer and sponsor. And later sold them to P&G Productions.  Verifying this would require a very very dedicated researcher.  And my research days are behind me.   

Agnes Nixon, Ted Corday, and Bill Bell took Irna's early practice even further by creating their own TV soaps, licensing them to a network, and then opening their own production companies to produce the shows.  Then years later -- when their creations had been popular in the ratings -- sold their shows (either partially, or entirely) to the network or another production company. Claire Labine did exactly the same thing with Ryan's Hope.  But of course, Labine had never worked for Ms. Phillips.  

As far as I know, Irna Phillips never owned her own production company.  But research might prove otherwise.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, your point was dead-on. And, I saw the sense of it immediately. I also just happened to know the 4 people who owned AW for a few years, even though I am not sure of the spelling of names. I like it, when you follow me around & make my posts make sense!!! You & me, we is buddies. And, if anyone doesn't like it, they can lump it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I hope you don't think I am following you around, like a busy-body.  And you do not need my comments to help you make sense. You make sense on your own.  Sometimes I just have an insight to add.  That's all.   

And if the nasty girls don't like it, well . . . being a good Christian woman, I just can't say it. (wiping a tear with my apron)

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Ron C breakdowns usually involve quick snip scenes.. and so far, it is apparent in spades.  I wish we had the longer scenes like we had in the previous few episodes. And I see Febreeze appeared again today.  More airtime/purpose than Ashley/Derek LOL
    • I loved Felicia and Donna. They were two of the reasons I couldn't stop watching the show even when the writing was horrible. I was never really a fan of Rachel's unless she was sniping at Cecile (my fave character!). But Felicia and Donna (especially Anna Stuart) are AW to me. Of course, it was around the time of their arrivals that I remember I started watching the show. I was 10 in '83. For me, they were always there. I wouldn't have wanted either of them to be killed off.  Rachel and Mac were okay for me but I never saw most of their relationship play or Rachel's previous work with Steve and Alice. I just saw her as there; the matriarch. Never a fan of Rachel and Carl. It made no sense whatsoever.  I did like Quinn and was shocked when they killed her off. Her and Zack were just starting to become a couple I wanted to watch. She should definitely have been a fixture on the show along with her family. Carter and Thomasina I thought were fun and a great couple, too.  That's the thing about being an AW fan. The show was always on the brink of greatness, but then it would shoot itself in the foot with stupid decisions from writing to cast exits, etc. They could just never quite get it together. The cast was amazing! It's the only thing that saved them for so long. 
    • I LOVED LD on AW...one of my all time favorite characters! However, on OLTL, her character was pretty pointless from the word go. I think trying to make her this character she played decades before was also a bad choice. She should have been a brand new character that could have been tied into the current canvas better. Rae really had no connections or family on the show. Imagine if she had been brought on as a recast Melinda Cramer, freshly released from the hospital. She would have been tied into a major family, be Kelly's mother, and have some real drama to play opposite RS.
    • it's up  BTG Episode #48 - May 8th cbs.com https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/vEQupDSVKChQKTvVWgX8mrUj2kCJEQTv/ paramountplus https://www.paramountplus.com/shows/video/vEQupDSVKChQKTvVWgX8mrUj2kCJEQTv/
    • I agree DZ is doing good work.  It's nice to see him getting meaty material again.  It's just off. Sonny was also low key the voice of reason saying when talking about Gio which I don't love lol.  And, yes, Dante calling a 15? 16? kid who had a couple of beers reckless at heart is silly.  I think most people had a few drinks in high school.  In isolation, the scenes with Jason/Danny were good when he was talking about AJ's drinking problem.  If you ignore everything else about what Jason did to AJ it was a good historic throwback.
    • @janea4old Tricia Mann-Grant also called Leslie a narcissist in the ET special before it premiered. Thank you! Looking forward to it.
    • -- This is maddening. DZ is acting his ass off, but the script is a mess. As you said, if Dante came down hard on Rocco, these outbursts would make some sense. Comparatively, though, Rocco got a pass, and that's just insane. Dante's not only criticizing Danny and Gio, but the people who raised them. It's just nuts. -- And then Dante goes to his father -- the mob boss killer WHO SHOT DANTE -- to declare Danny "reckless at heart." JFC. -- Kai was in the hospital for that dislocated shoulder about 3x as long as Sonny was in the hospital for his heart. Make it make sense.  
    • I'm really of the mind now that Leslie really did have that abortion and Eva isn't Ted or her child. 
    • Isn’t it thrilling to get that kind of buzz from a performance again? If this show had nothing else going for it (and it has other real strengths, including the actress opposite her), that would be enough to keep me invested. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy