Jump to content

NBC Daytime


Jdee43

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I always thought I read and heard she was the one who bought Y&R to the number 1 ratings.  It never made sense to me after watching Generations for months and finding it so boring, poorly written and equal to taking a valium.  Somehow, I can't see Y&R and the yawn Generations having the same writer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sally’s Days was great soap. She gave us The Killing Pool (Eileen’s epic exit storyline), the death of Franco Kelly and its fallout, the wedding of John and Marlena, and Princess Gina/Swamp Girl. She was a worthy successor to JER and I’d love to have her back. 

Not entirely true. Days had the only permanent outdoor set (Salem Place) from 1992-2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oct 92 NBC CANS 'SANTA BARBARA,' GIVES BACK TIME Affiliates will get half -hour from network, NBC puts Rohrbeck in charge of daytime

NBC made the move speculated about for the past year when it announced last week the cancellation of the multi -award winning but low rated daytime soap Santa Barbara. In addition, the network has turned over a half hour of time to its affiliates and turned over responsibility for the daypart to John Rohrbeck, president, NBC -TV Stations, in an attempt to improve support among affiliates for the network's daytime programing.

Santa Barbara wasn't the only casualty last week; the network also canceled Dr. Dean, with both series scheduled to end their NBC runs on Jan. 15, 1993. The network intends to feed four hours of daytime programing to affiliates, with two hours made up of the soaps Another World and Days of Our Lives, and the other two hours made up of the half hour Faith Daniels talk show and an hour and a half of game shows.

The 90 minute block of game shows will be made up of possibly three shows. One option is to produce a new, hour version of Classic Concentration and pair it with one of several projects in development. Currently being looked at are a return of Scrabble, which the network dumped to make room for Generations several years ago, Scategories, or Swap Meet, the latter described as similar to The Price Is Right.

By the summer of 1993, however, the network expects the four -hour daytime feed to consist of the two soaps,an hour of game shows and an hour of talk. The talk hour is expected to consist of either a retooled hour version of Faith Daniels's A Closer Look or an hour long show featuring NBC News legal correspondent Star Jones.

As part of the restructuring, NBC has formed the Affiliate Daytime Committee, to be chaired by Lee, general manager, KHQ -TV Spokane, Wash. The group will work closely with the network in scheduling and advertising and promotion activities with regard to daytime programing. Warren Littlefield, president, NBC Entertainment, said the changes have come about as a result of necessity. "We've had a problem in the daypart for the past 15 years, and I've spent the last two years trying to analyze those problems. We're not a traditional network in these dayparts as we are in late night or prime time. Only 14% of our affiliates carry our daytime schedule as we feed it. We can't think like a network," he said, "we have to put on the glasses of the local stations and better idea of what they're seeing."

The half hour being returned to stations was a concession to affiliates that the advisory committee suggested. "It's something they said they needed," said Littlefield, who also stressed that the stations "would rather be in bed with us rather than syndicators. That's because once those syndicated shows become popular the price starts going up."

The stand out for me was that only 14% of affiliates were running the schedule. NBC allowed that and paid the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this is what trips us up with their shows having high clearances - yes, they were airing the shows, but at what time? I also imagine that it would screw up any nationwide promotional efforts for these shows. Why did NBC never push back on this, especially later in the 90s when they attempted to launch Sunset Beach? Maybe they had hoped that affiliates would choose the best time slot to optimize the ratings for those soaps, but clearly that didn't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NBC Entertainment prez Warren Littlefield comments on Daytime Nov 92

John Rohrbeck [president of the NBC-owned stations] was recently given oversight of NBC daytime as well. What's ahead for that daypart?

Well, strategically, what we've had to look at is what's the reality for NBC in the daypart. In late night, we have outstanding clearances. Daytime? We have the schedule, but the fact of the matter is 14% of our stations actually ran it the way we intended.

The entire schedule? Yes, 14% of our stations were running the daytime schedule live, the way we would feed it. So we have multiple feeds, and everyone had their own needs, including some of our O &Os. So I think what we've been realizing, and have been articulating for a while, is that we can't proceed with the kind of network arrogance of, "Oh, we're going to do it, therefore it's going to happen." Because in reality, in the marketplace, it wasn't happening. We formed the Affiliate Daytime Committee to have a more direct relationship with really smart broadcasters out there who are affiliate partners, and what they said is: "We need you in daytime. We can't be in a situation where we are victims for syndicators. Yes, we will take part of our daytime schedule, and, of course, we have to acquire shows from syndicators,  but we can't have our entire daytime schedule be in that kind of flux and jeopardy. We need you." So that was important for us to hear. Then what we've basically had to start looking at is: "What do they need? How can we supply it? How can we succeed ?" We started to say: "All right, we've got to meet their needs. We've got to get into a market to be able to sell much better on a market -for -market basis, the way a syndicator would." We asked ourselves: "How do we induce our stations to get better clearances and to get better promotion, and get them invested in the success of these shows ?" And that's what we've been doing. Now, if you say: "How do you reach and succeed with most of the country?" well, John Rohrbeck has almost 25% of the country with the owned and operated stations. Now, that's a way to increase your base. You've got to be in sync with John Rohrbeck's needs. And what it really became was that strategically it just seemed to make much more sense that the way to accomplish it was to have Rohrbeck running that daypart.

Is NBC going to have a pool of programs from which the affiliates will be able to pick and choose, or will you still try to provide a lineup? Clearly, Days of Our Lives and Another World are critically important enough to us that they be played back to back and that they get total support throughout the country. And we will get that. We can't afford to offer a pool of programs, but if we offer a show that we believe in, and not enough stations carry it, then, you know, we'll go out and try and sell it on a market -for -market basis. That's what we're going to have to do.

To competing stations? Yes. We've really got to change the rules. What we can't do is say: "Oh, here are the 12 choices and, you know, we're going to license these shows, or even own them, and you get to pick, say, four." We're not a Chinese restaurant. But I think, because of the Affiliate Committee, and because of John Rohrbeck's and John Miller's efforts, we're going to be offering product that more closely resembles what the stations need. Look at the way Oprah has succeeded. We're going to do experiments with CNBC. We're going to do station experiments, and then roll out after we can build a track record of success in an individual market, then roll out nationally if we feel we've got the goods.

Do you risk losing even more clearances, whether live or delayed, by in effect saying to affiliates: "If you don't clear our programs, the ones that we're offering, then we're going to have to take them elsewhere in the market ?" As I said earlier, we're going to be less arrogant about what their needs are, and we realize that in the nonsoap programing, there's going to be more movement as to what those station's needs are.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 12/10/73-12/14/73 & 12/17/73-12/21/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

      FAST WEEKLY WEEK OF 12/24/73-12/28/73 NOT AVAILABLE (Note: Per newspaper listings, the only scheduled preemptions were 12/25/73 for Dinah's Place and Baffle (preempted by Christmas Service from Washington National Cathedral). All other daytime shows were scheduled to air every day this week). That's a wrap for 1973!  Coming next are the 1973 specials, the spot checks of the 1973 non-soap daytime shows and a look at the 1973 Saturday & Sunday morning/afternoon series. 
    • KMH was annoying AF as Emily or as I call her "Emiloon" that screech crying yikes, so bad
    • spoiler alert AMC...   Ha..this is one of those storylines, much like the Salem Stalker...and whatever Alex was supposed to be holding over Alan's head that Henry knew about...what was the original intention of the through line..who is Mary Bauer and why does Meta know Zach (I know what Zach is supposed to be but was he human before...is Chele a reincarnation of Mary? )Eventually was he supposed to become human? Why is he so dull if he who is supposed to be...but it does make sense on why he is so sexless.  Of course, what the hell was the burial ground storyline of Qualo..it was like they were trying to reenact the 80s with that  temple storyline Marland gave them...would have been more interesting to have Stacy come back with "return from the dead" Silas Crocker in disguise as an older lover.  McTavish is at loose threads here and you can tell she just does not give a damn anymore.  A great idea is hidden in the whole Roger/Dinah/Hart mess....Roger having a midlife crisis and breakdown would have been good...being confronted with all of his misdeeds, the two rapes, and also his murders (the show always likes to forget that he pushed a woman down the stairs and had to have killed people in the CIA.) Maybe something he does accidentally causes Holly to miscarry, and then he does something again accidnetly to hurt Hart so he thinks he killed him. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • OMG! Not Lily vs Phyllis with Amanda giving the sip tea look!  The Dru came out in Lily!!! lol.
    • I remember, for their wedding, TPTB pulled out the old Stewart patio which had not been seen for years (and was not seen again). But during the 1960s, Ellen and David's patio was seen somewhat often during the summer months.  
    • OMG! Yes!! Best of the episode and double so after my rewatch. She got Anita ALL...THE...WAY...TOGETHER. I can't wait to get caught up and see Sharon.   Now you.  re: Samantha.   Same. I was so annoyed with Month 2 for stalling on Martin's Secret, but in hindsight...that was perfect because I got used to their characters and their lives so NOW I feel so much more invested when the Secret comes out. And how it's been done as a slow burn during May Sweeps with Bill toying with them keeps Bill in villain mode while giving organic conflict for Martin and Smitty due to what's been written for them building up to this month. Bonus...it's clear the actors are soooo much more comfortable with each other.    The one thing that I looove about Vernon is that while that is very much true what you said...when need be...he shows very brief moments of an edge. CHOOSE SILENCE...like BE STILL...lives rent free in my head. lol. I can't wait to use that on someone.  You wouldn't be alone in that. While not perfect...and haters are going to hate...if you get enjoyment even with flaws, why does anyone have an issue with Pollyanna? I see people are enjoying GH, and I have well documented reasons for liking and disliking it. And I don't at all hate on everyone who have been enjoying it and regularly watch it. It's like seeing a tweet you don't like on the Twitter. You see it, have no need to add to it, and keep scrolling.  Same. But tbf...is ANYONE screaming that now...or just naturally liking the show?  Same. But I am a sucker for bangs.  
    • The last thing I want on a new soap -- or on any soap -- is an actor thinking she's a kid in a candy store. I know Cady has plenty of fans, but I'm just not fond at all of all these accents (and accent changes) and tics. The show should INSIST she settle on a consistent character for Pamela -- now. The idea that these established soap actors get to play around like it's a game is bizarre. I don't like what she's doing at all, and the fact that I can't tell you what she's doing makes it even worse.   The hour does fly by, and I do enjoy the show. I'm no longer on a high with the show and screaming "I love this show!" though. That's not a bad thing. We can't forget we're still in the first 6 months and every soap had to deal with first-year struggles and changes. I'm willing to give GATES time on all of it. In the meantime, though, I have to call out the stuff that isn't working. Yo're exactly right about the editing. Those "sudden drop offs to commercial"? I hate them. I think they're awful and poorly executed in all phases -- the timing, the music, the fade itself. I have no idea what they're doing. I've said this before: I think it's intentional. It's not just one director, and it's clearly a production choice. I think they want to be "the different soap." Sorry, this ain't the place to do that. They have not only ruined scene endings galore with these fades, but they have ruined cliffhangers. Ending a show with something dramatic followed by an "Oh, well" fade makes no sense to me.
    • I'll say this much...for the most part...soaps WERE giving this Sweeps...LOL. I'm looking at you, BTG, DAYS, and YES GH.

      Please register in order to view this content

          But knowing that, I really want to know...especially since I'm behind on at least two of those soaps lol due to work and faulty technology...how would you all grade May Sweeps this time?   A     B     C     D     F       To paraphrase Dani Dupree...the hottest level of Hades...?   How did you like Sweeps?    
    • 5-26   My system went down, but thankfully is back up. It's a shame that if I missed something, I just don't care. So May Sleeps indeed. smh.    That said...I found this episode intriguing. Yeah, it had a LOT of the characters that I didn't care about. And I know @slick jones probably glared seeing his man around that girl,

      Please register in order to view this content

       but I will give credit where it's due.    It must be a sign there is about to FINALLY be story movement when we start to get artistic camera angles again...something that has been absent for a while. The overhead sweeping into the scene at the start of the episode? LOVE. Good to see Ed Scott is still around somewhere. And I loved what Phyllis had on and Amanda in the red. Claire continued to have her own style and Holden continued to look hot. And I continue to be in awe that the designer is trying her darnest to get Kyle from looking so stuffy but still keep him suited.    Everything Audra continued to intrigue. And I continue to feel that Kyle is totally going to fall into her trap because he is much too cocky. Holden is a great wild card, but I don't like him hinting that perhaps Audra actually have feelings for Kyle. THAT boat has sailed and would have been better used when Summer was around. Besides I love Audra with Nate.   Phyllis vs Sally will always be awesome. And they were both giving great lines.    I could care less for Billy. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy