Jump to content

The future of Soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I didn't exactly know how to title this thread, but with Corday suing Sony it got me thinking about the future of what we popularly call soaps, or rather daytime soaps - accessible melodramas that can be followed (almost) daily.

 

I pointed out in the Corday/DAYS thread that the current soaps need to learn how to monetize their products - live ratings are sinking year-by-year for every shows on television so selling or even syndicating old episodes will be key. They need to use the fact that they have such a large catalog of content to fund future episodes. Look at The Simpsons - it's losing money on its first run episodes but is making up for that by syndication and merchandise. The Simpsons is now a half hour commercial for their wast catalog - maybe that's how soaps should reason to stay on air?

 

At this point just uploading the episodes on YouTube would at least bring in some revenue, no matter how small...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There isn’t one.  I truly think it’s limping to an ultimate death.  If they haven’t already utilized their back catalog to make money they are not going to start now.

 

If you follow a company like Shout, which releases things on DVD that major studios pass on, you know just how expensive moving older material into a new format is.  These are corporations, they want to make money, and the investment to turn these things into current money isn’t worth it to them.

 

Those ATWT/GL DVD’s sold well.  But for whatever reason, it wasn’t enough to continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes.  I just used DVD’s as an example of what happens with this niche material when it does get a release.  Maybe I’m overly pessimistic, but I think the moment in time for soaps to exist outside their daily airings came and went, and these fool studios and networks don’t see it as viable enough to try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Oh no, I completely agree. 

I just wanted to clarify that the difference in producing new material (which, like you said, isn't really feasible now, especially in a Mon-Friday form) and streaming classic material that has been in the can and on the shelves for years. I think the latter could be done with some ingenuity as the old AOL streaming platform and SoapClassics website showed (briefly) with some PGP soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's no future for network daytime drama.  The current shows are placeholders as the landscape changes.  Not only a result of technology but horribly unqualified and stupid executives who make dumb decisions.  Think Nathan Varni at ABC and Angelica McDaniel at CBS.  Plus they continue to hire hacks to produce and write the shows, and regurgitate the same stories: baby switch, evil twin, back from dead, DNA switches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Her accent sounds horrible and doesn't fit in line with the character or the dialogue. I was just messing around on YouTube and perusing early Tad and Dixie videos. Notably, Dixie, a resident of Pigeon Hollow, West Virginia, has no discernible accent. i have no idea why she would add a defunct accent to this character now. I want to do an honest survey here. I watch BTG every day and I love it. It's not perfect, but I find it 99% entertaining. For those that find fault with it - what is actually bothering you? I'm not going to argue at all, or disagree with you. I just want to know what others are seeing that I'm not.
    • It's a choice and today, she made it more British than ever before. It's almost like she's making Pamela act like how she thinks she should be acting.
    • I cannot believe there is a whole storyline about the Abbott house renovation. They really are grasping over at Y&R. I don’t see a big difference in the set. It is refreshed. Why make a storyline out of it? 
    • Cady is using what sounds like a transatlantic accent which is so odd these days. Sharon's hostility is entertaining already. That look she gave Anita when she opened the door was pure attitude.
    • Glad you agree about Chandler’s smirking. It’s the reason I criticize him. He hasn’t grown as an actor, unfortunately. I don’t fawn over him because of his looks. I wish he’d never appear until he loses his smirking style of acting.  Dee is doing a great job but yes, the story with the bandages isn’t the best. I get it- Drake wasn’t available and its a throwback to how John came to Salem, but it’s tough to get into the scenes when we know it’s not Drake under the bandages. 
    • From that same channel, Anything For Love, which failed to make NBC's 1985-86 schedule. With all due respect to Lauren Tewes and Vicki Lawrence, that this was under consideration seems less about their star power and/or chemistry and more that NBC wanted its own Kate & Allie. Still, kudos to Lauren for being rehabilitated enough in one year to already go on the comeback trail.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy