Jump to content

Josh Duhamel and co. Sells a soap opera to ABC


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Dont know if this was already posted as I dont hang out in all the topics here and I'm not too sure if this is the right place for it. But here goes any way

"At ABC, Transformers star Josh Duhamel is teaming with Gretchen J. Berg and Aaron Harberts for an untitled drama about a daytime soap opera that explores the loves, lives and lunacy at an on-the-bubble network soap opera, where the antics of the cast and crew are crazier than any plot lines they broadcast. Set as the TV genre is faltering, the larger-than-life workplace family fights a never-ending desperate battle to keep their show on the air, egos secure and relationships in tact."

Source:( For more read on)

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/josh-duhamel-oliver-hudson-mark-gordon-soaps-abc-nbc-389919

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, they've worked with Bryan Fuller on two of his shows, "Wonderfalls" and "Pushing Daisies," which were both very good (although, short-lived and clearly run by BF and his quirky approach). Aside from that, though, they've worked on "Roswell," which I hated; "John Doe," which I hated; "North Shore," which I hated; "Pepper Dennis," which I HATED!!! (and they co-created); "Off the Map," "Women's Murder Club," "Mercy," "GCB," and "Revenge," which I wouldn't say I hate, it's just not a series that appeals to me. They also wrote the screenplay for that horrid horror movie w/ David Boreanaz, "Valentine," back in the day, and served for a time as story editors on the original "90210," but not during the show's so-called "glory years."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So they've created a lot of those "too good for TV" shows, which usually means the show is too busy winking at its own brilliance to bother to tell a coherent or entertaining story.

I don't like the Soapdish stuff, I think it's badly dated and patronizing, but maybe this will be a different approach. I wish it were on a better network.

The idea of focusing on a dying genre is at least different, but the whole wacky, crazy approach doesn't work for me anymore. The 80s are over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, they've created only "Pepper Dennis" thus far, which I thought to be not at all amusing. But they do have this knack of writing (IMO) poor scripts for poor series that are about "not taking themselves seriously." Right up (or down) there with Krista Vernoff and her hacky "Charmed" scribe ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought you meant they'd helped create a few of the Fuller shows (I feel like his shows are almost designed to fail, because they're so deliberately precious and struggle to make any attempt to bring in viewers).

Was Pepper Dennis one of those legal dramas or PI shows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oops. My bad. Apologies, Carl (and anyone else), for misleading you there. No, Bryan Fuller created "Wonderfalls" and "Pushing Daisies" on his own; he just hired Berg & Harberts to be staff writers/co-EP's on both.

"Pepper Dennis," starring the supermodel who used to be married to John Stamos, was about a girl TV reporter who, as best as I can recall, had one of those "quirky" (read: annoying and demeaning) crushes on her co-worker, the lead news anchor, played by Josh Hopkins, another actor whose alleged charm or charisma escapes me completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If ABC is tanking primetime-wise, it's only because they coasted too long on "Desperate Housewives," "Grey's Anatomy" and the like, and haven't done enough to cultivate new and different kinds of series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A show about the bts action on a soap opera, (or of the soap industry at large) under the premise of the medium dying could be a brilliant show in the right hands (e.g., HBO). A show like this needs more than an insider on its team, it needs a level headed insider with some damn sense. I feel like there are people on this board who could write a show like this. A show that would go beyond the all too obvious aging diva, perky ingenue, dumb himbo route, but throw in some desperate bloggers, famewhore columnists/magazine editors, the nutjob president of "Keep Soap Ailve", et cetera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You missed off the token gay writers or PR people, one of them campy and campy and the other morose and suicidal (maybe they can save money and combine the character).

ABC shows seem to become aimless very early on, over and over. I'm never sure why. I hear that about Revenge all the time, as I did with Lost, Desperate Housewives, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Looking forward to hearing your perspective. Tuesday was a little... ehhh though 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And Ron sort of did like a half-assed rewrite to bring them together. Apparently, Stephanie had never met Alex until 2022, even though she already knew Sonny, Joe and Vic 
    • Friday Thoughts:    June and Hayley are going to turn out to be related, or else why the casting on June's character if not for that.  Their voices and mannerisms are similar and Marquita had mentioned in an interview that we would be finding out more about Hayley's backstory.   Tomas/Eva/Kat is for sure going to be moving full steam ahead.. and I can't wait

      Please register in order to view this content

      Dani/Bill = yawn    Bill/Smitty = Interest reeved up and we all know that means the secret involving Martin/Smitty/Anita is kicking into high gear for May sweeps. Vanessa/Nicole = A satisfying friendship scene.. and Nicole's statement about Vanessa's outside interests.. I did not see that coming Nicole/Andre = I noticed that Andre volunteered knowing about the affair, but managed to withhold the nugget of information where he had convinced Ted not to confess to Nicole. Dani/Ted = This perked my interest Nicole/Silk Press Sheila = A great way to end a Friday episode.  Sometimes grandma's soaps shouldn't be discarded, but followed. Martin/Smitty = Kat is right that Smitty is too good for Martin.. and Martin did act as though he missed his afternoon nap. Ashley/Derek = Unpopular opinion.. I actually kind of missed them.   I view their scenes as a great way to kickstart a drinking game... take a shot anytime you wonder to yourself what is the point to their characters and/or either one of them says something cringey.  You'll be guaranteed to be buzzing by the end of the episode Previews for next week: Looks like Nicole has found out about Dani/Andre's FWB set up? Kat vs Silk Press Sheila looks promising.      
    • I think it depends on whether the character has a passionate fanbase. A character like Ava always has people who will defend her and back her up, as does a character like Nina (when they used to write for Nina, anyway). Dante doesn't.
    • Go 'head, Martin!! GATHER.   Oh my goodness!!! Now we are getting Bill/Smitty. The combos today. 
    • Yeah; I feel like, in previous regimes, it wasn't as consistent as this. You could go episodes without it changing. I just hate the random indent on the secondary head writer.
    • Got it. I vaguely remember this being discussed. I guess it's fair.
    • Why does this Smitty/Kat talk feel like foreshadowing what's coming with Martin's Secret?   Hahaha. Not Kat and Tomas keep getting business in their way. And uh oh...Eva.   Oh, there's Ashley and Derek. Mmmm those pants.   And ooooooooo another Ted/Martin scene. YES, PLEASE.   Andre...no, no, no!!!! This is going to come back on you with Dani!!
    • I believe in the separation of church and soap.  
    • Danny and Rocco..... and Lulu(who usually annoys the heck out of me) were the best thing about today's boring episode. Even Sasha and Willow's were

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm all for the long game, but this is stuff is going on and on and on.......... 
    • Definitely. Paul and Eric said as much in their zoom in January. I think October might see the real vision of the new team.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy