Jump to content

January 9-13, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Come on GL!!!!!!!! Sesame Street.....I mean Passions is trying to go for that #8 spot. :rolleyes:

GL will get better and so will the ratings. :P

Days and Passions will fall flat cause JERk will pull out all the crap he can think of to win sweeps and then it will be back to the same ol repetitive stuff and the ratings will fall again. It's like clockwork, this man never ceases to disgust me.

GL beat OLTL in total viewers on thursday! WOW! Miracles can happen even if it lasts for one day. :lol:

DK better get with program cause the day Passions beats GL in Households and Total Viewers is the day I storm into DK's office hog tie him and take over as head writer. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah I agree-its great that the NBC soaps are slowly building up their numbers. It is so much better that way and, historically, means that they both won't crash and burn. They may go down a little but not back to the depths of 1.7 (passions) and 2.5(Days) at least for awhile. Days stabilized over the fall and from Novmeber on has been slowly inching up with Passions so this bodes well for NBC. They are off to a great 2006 and from the looks of both shows I think things will continue to get better.

I am happy for all the soaps numbers. Its good to see some postives. I still can't believe some of those Passions dailies compared to GL's Fansoap. Its incredible.

I am happy for all soaps but especially for my Days and Passions as well. I will hope that Days can maintain its numbers for this week. I would love it to go up and hit 3.0 and for Passions to hit 2.0 but I doubt it. It might for Days because stuff actually happened but Passions slowed a bit so I will just be happy if next week's numbers are pretty much the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Toups, your ratings source is standing by the AMC/GH rating number for that week? I wonder if SOW put the same numbers out for the 1/3 week.

MOST VIEWED EPISODE FOR EACH SOAP IN BOLD:

1..Y&R: Wednesday, 1/11: 4.5/5,723,000

2..Y&R: Monday, 1/9: 4.3/5,656,000

3..Y&R: Thursday, 1/12: 4.3/5,599,000

4..Y&R: Tuesday, 1/10: 4.3/5,582,000

5..Y&R: Friday, 1/13: 4.1/5,225,000

6..B&B: Wednesday, 1/11: 3.5/4,484,000

7..B&B: Thursday, 1/12: 3.4/4,409,000

8..B&B: Tuesday, 1/10: 3.3/4,348,000

9..B&B: Monday, 1/9: 3.4/4,305,000

10..B&B: Friday, 1/13: 3.1/4,081,000

11..DAYS: Wednesday, 1/11: 3.1/3,882,000

12..DAYS: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.9/3,869,000

13..DAYS: Friday, 1/13: 3.0/3,785,000

14..GH: Monday, 1/9: 3.1/3,783,000[

15..ATWT: Monday, 1/9: 2.8/3,673,000

16..DAYS: Monday, 1/9: 2.8/3,667,000

17..ATWT: Thursday, 1/12: 2.7/3,608,000

18..GH: Wednesday, 1/11: 2.8/3,533,000

19..ATWT: Wednesday, 1/11: 2.8/3,516,000

20..AMC: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.7/3,463,000

21..ATWT: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.8/3,462,000

22..AMC: Monday, 1/9: 2.7/3,445,000

23..GH: Thursday, 1/12: 2.7/3,437,000

24..OLTL: Monday, 1/9: 2.7/3,384,000

25..GH: Friday, 1/13: 2.7/3,379,000

26..AMC: Wednesday, 1/11: 2.7/3,361,000

27..GH: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.8/3,357,000

28..DAYS: Thursday, 1/12: 2.7/3,344,000

29..ATWT: Friday, 1/13: 2.5/3,345,000

30..OLTL: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.5/3,285,000

31..OLTL: Wednesday, 1/11: 2.6/3,193,000

31..OLTL: Friday, 1/13: 2.6/3,193,000

33..GL: Thursday, 1/12: 2.3/3,087,000

34..GL: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.5/3,035,000

35..AMC: Friday, 1/13: 2.6/3,026,000

36..OLTL: Thursday, 1/12: 2.4/3,009,000

37..GL: Monday, 1/9: 2.3/3,002,000

38..AMC: Thursday, 1/12: 2.4/2,974,000

39..PSNS: Tuesday, 1/10: 2.1/2,897,000

40..GL: Wednesday, 1/11: 2.3/2,796,000

41..GL: Friday, 1/13: 2.2/2,663,000

42..PSNS: Thursday, 1/12: 2.0/2,508,000

43..PSNS: Friday, 1/13: 1.8/2,398,000

44..PSNS: Wednesday, 1/11: 1.9/2,451,000

45..PSNS: Monday, 1/9: 1.8/2,344,000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

#3 in HH

#3 in Total Viewers

#3 in Male Viewers

#3 in Females 12-17

#1 in Women 18-34

#1 in Women 18-49

#3 in Women 25-54

IMO those are AWESOME placings for DAYS OF OUR LIVES. So happy for them, especially this week, they TRULY deserved to go up and place highly on ALL the ratings lists. DAYS has slowly been gaining .1 a month in averages, IMO this is GOOD news for the show because slow steady gains often stick better than huge spikes in the ratings.

Lets HOPE that DAYS can crack 3.0 next week, but Im not gonna get my hopes up.

Also lets hope DAYS can nab #1 in 18-49 again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Thursday's show didnt have so so numbers, DAYS would have hit a 3.0! I am just glad DAYS seems to be inching up in viewers, slowly but surely. I do wish for at least a week DAYS could be outright number 1 in the 18-49 demos, but I am thrilled its at least tied for first.

I think DAYS should be able to hold onto these numbers and with February just around the corner, DAYS should be in awesome shape for renegotitions in March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm afraid that getting rid of DH alone won't do the trick. The show needs interesting well paced and well acted stories. Character driven plots, romance and family. Instead we get contrived plot points, the destruction of the core family, zero continuity and attention to detail while the acting challenged suck up the majority of the screen time. IOW until the show decides to offer something beyond the status quo to lure back those who have stopped or are in the process of stopping to watch it's not going to rise in the ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DK better get with program cause the day Passions beats GL in Households and Total Viewers is the day I storm into DK's office hog tie him and take over as head writer.

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but it HAS already happened. In January 2005 PSNS beat GL in total viewers. PSNS was #8. GL was #9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy