Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Have y'all ever read about this poster "SourceRyan" almost getting sued by a DAYS writer for what it was thought he was tweeting? I never had till today. 

https://tvsourcemagazine.com/2012/09/3049-tvsource-responds-to-legal-request-from-former-days-of-our-lives-head-writer-marlene-mcpherson/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It’s my first time going through the 1984 episodes and I reached the end of September 1984 after like working getting through that year for the last 3 years lol

But Kimberly got introduced and seemed to be on the run and afraid of someone but we still haven’t learned who it was after like 3-4 months with her being around.

BUT Tony-Kimberly had some flirting going on over weeks. I wonder why the writers never went there with Tony DiMera and Kimberly Brady tbh.

The Prism Story became so boring. Only thing keeping it alive for me is that Alice Horton and Tom Horton are heavily involved in helping Bo and Hope.

I’m confused. I know Larry is a villain and a wretch for Hope and Bo. But when Hope started dating/seeing Larry she actually liked him as a friend. I mean she kinda got forced into marrying him but that was out of Larry’s hands. He always treated her right and seemed really into her. But all of the sudden he is so deeply in love with Gwen and hates Hope and Hope hates him. Which made no sense coz they actually were pretty good friends at first. Weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was one thing I noticed when I watched the 1984 episodes and read the early 80s synopses: there was a lot of chem testing and flirtations that ultimately went nowhere. And while they testing Kim/Tony, it also seemed to me like they were testing Kim/Don as well. 

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days seemed to wander a bit that year after the serial killer storyline. I don't know how far they planned things in advance but Wayne Northrop's departure probably threw a wrench in some of those plans.

The cast had been giving way more to younger characters and by the end of 1984 a lot centered around characters who had been there less than two years, several only a few months. Thankfully for the show, it ended up being a darn solid group of characters. I like a lot of 1985.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kim/Tony is an interesting idea. I also noticed what felt like a Tony/Sandy chem test in an episode (I think from '83) I watched a while back. One has to wonder what the show could've been like if they'd gone either of those directions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's crazy to me that they never gave Tony (or even Andre) a kid. Hell, the Stefan/Jake characters could've been Tony's. Not that I want more random DiMeras now, but they have drained the Stefano-has-another-kid well bone-dry. 

Tony/Kim and Tony/Sandy are such interesting alternate timelines. I always wonder what would've happened if Marlena had been paired with one of the Horton sons (Mickey, Bill, or Tommy) instead of with Don and then Roman, too. It's unlikely you would've gotten that lightning-in-a-bottle thing that happened with her and Roman in the early 80s, but her being tied to the Hortons would've provided a whole new path for that family to flourish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Roman & Marlena were as popular as Luke & Laura at a particular time. The trick there is that it was a time when Luke & Laura were off the canvas. Heh heh. But, still, they were VERY popular. Roman & Anna were not a thing. Roman & Anna were together in the distant past, offscreen, before their characters had been created. Then, Anna showed up with this little 4 year old girl & a wild story. By that time Roman & Marlena were together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True. (I started to watch Days regulary between 1987/89.. But had a few breaks and missed a lot up until 2002/2003 when Chloe and Brady were a thing.)

Anna was always one of my favorites when she returned in the 2000’s. But to finally see her in her prime years is so amazing. I do think if they would’ve invested in Roman and Anna they would’ve worked too.

i still find it weird that after all those episodes and popularity of Roman/Marlena that they pretend like they never happened. Nothing against Jarlena. But it’s odd. Maybe it has to do with Wayne not being Roman anymore but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy