Jump to content

Accents


quartermainefan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I forgot to mention that another bizarro world occurence is when people say <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/nəˌgəʊ.siˈeɪ.ʃən/</span> instead of <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/nəˌgəʊ.ʃiˈeɪ.ʃən/</span> , something I've noticed on BBC, and stuff like <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ˈɪs.juː/</span> , which is quite legitimate and correct, except that it kind of goes against the current of dying-out pronunciations like <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ˈtɪs.juː/</span> . Oh, well, I guess they're not dying out as some would like to point out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, many of the sounds you mentioned that have a distinctly "affected" ring to them to the average American are still taught as part of Standard American Speech for the stage. Specifically, for the purpose of performing classical texts, even more specifically, Shakespeare. For instnace, the "liquid u" as you pointed out in words like issue and tissue (and yes, we use a "s" and not a "sh", so for anyone else reading this thread other than you and I :lol: who is not familiar with IPA, we get issue=issyoo, tissue=tissyoo, Tuesday=Tyoozdih).

And yes, learning the IPA was a part of our speech curriculum, we had written tests and pop quizzes on it and all that. I have PLENTY of faults so I'll be kind enough to pat myself on the back for my good ear, I did quite well with accent work. Something I should practice more often though, I've learned that you can easily lose it not only when you're rusty but when you're nervous.

"I also found it amusing that RADA still teaches /hw/ as a distinct sound, even though today's RP does not have the so-called wine–whine distinction. But it does differentiate between foot and strut, it's still non-rhotic, has the broad a, Mary–marry–merry are all quite distinct as well as nearer and mirror and so on."

Yes, hw is still taught in SAS ("Hwy, hwat would you?/Hwither hwich way?"). It's a very light sound though, they overdo it on TV when they're making fun of it, but it's supposed to be like you're softly blowing out a candle. They also still teach, "Very merry Mary married hairy Harry Harris from Harrisburg." (veh-rih meh-rih mare-y ma[like the a in hat]-rid hare-y ha-rih ha-ris from ha-risbirg). The sound "ear" in "nearer" is its own vowel and "mirror" doesn't rhyme like "meer-er" but is "mih-ruh". I do not get the foot/strut thing, what's that about?

"What was once /ɪ/ (kit, mirror, rabbit) in the conservative RP, today turned into /i/, in words such as happy or valley. The weak /ɪ/ turned into to /ə/ in words such as countless or problem. The /ɔː/ of cough, salt, off, austere turned into /ɑ/. The word square is differently pronounced, too."

Yes, the crisp, bright "diamond ɪ (ih)", the i of "kit" or "chicken" gave way to the schwa in many cases where it's an unstressed syllable. So a very prrrrim and proper high RP Brit may have said 'eh-mih-lih for Emily where now we'd schwa out that middle syllable for 'eh-muh-lih. Suffix y's and other words are still properly ɪ, like the days of the week ('sun-dih, 'mon-dih), 'can-dih (candy), 'chel-sih (Chelsea)... As for the ɔː sound, the word "off" is actually not an ɔː word in the states, but an ɒ word in SAS (off, copper, pot, top, et cetera). It's very rare in everyday English, usually bastardized as aw as in claw (like the Brits) or ah as in father. But it's in actuality a very short round sound, like you're about to say "aw" but you quickly jab your uvula with your toothbrush before you get it all out. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I lived in England, and I can only recall one person who said "issyuu" and "tissyuu" for issue and tissue. Admittedly he had a posh accent, was older, and clearly from the right side of the tracks. The Hw sound in what or where was somehwhat more common and occasionally one still slips into my speech. The aw sound in off is sort of a cousin to the aw sound in NY english. I don't even know if I could spell how they sound, England was Cohfee, NY is more Cawfee. This is compared to the way say coffee in California or wherever, Cahfee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

laugh.gif OMG, I too thought I went overboard and that no one was reading!

Thank you for that very detailed reply, I love it. :) I didn't know that even the SAS teaches <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/hw/</span>! It would be nice to examine the differences between SAS today and the accent which quartermainefan called the "1940s radio accent", which is called Mid-Atlantic English (or trans-Atlantic): http://en.wikipedia....tlantic_English, a sort of a mixture between British and American speeches.

I think it's also starting to become something else in the contemporary RP, too, the <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ɔː/</span> sound. The BL web page above illustrates the shifts. Which brings me to this: how can the <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ɔː/</span> be bastardized as aw in claw when it really is pronounced as <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/klɔː/</span>? Perhaps I got something wrong. Copper is pronounced as <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ˈkɒp.ə/</span> and so is pot, though someone should check whether that shifted from <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ɔː/</span> too. For example, to me it would make sense to pronounce the word for a police officer that way, but not the name of the metal, which would retain the <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ɔː/</span>. LOL.

The foot–strut split is here:

http://en.wikipedia....oot-strut_split

And IPA for English, if anyone at all is interested, can be found here, though it kind of leans towards American English, I think:

http://en.wikipedia....IPA_for_English

British is here:

http://dictionary.ca.../phonetics.html

That Clive Upton guy really made a mess, he introduced certain symbols into one of the Oxford dictionaries in the early 1990s and all we ended up is more confusion:

http://en.wikipedia....iki/Clive_Upton

rolleyes.gif

So, given all the above, quartermainefan, I think you mean: British – <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ˈkɒf.i/</span>, American – <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ˈkɔːfi/</span> or <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/ˈkɑːfi/</span>.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Note also the lovely <span style="font-size:10.5pt; font-family: Lucida Sans Unicode;">/eɪ/</span> sound of that elderly lady, who is a conservative RP speaker, in that link above I gave: I think the beach is still a lovely place to play, with lots of, lots of space and, uh, beautiful surroundings.

happy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I've noticed at least three or four instances when the r is uvular (as in French). In RP r is usually an alveolar approximant and once also used to be an alveolar tap in intervocalic positions after an accented syllable, meaning words like spirit, very, sorry etc.

To hear the difference, go and check TheRoyalChannel on YouTube and the Queen's latest Christmas message – when she says spirit and very, it's an alveolar tap, but Christmas, recovery and inherited all have r as an alveolar approximant, another sign of how the Queen's English has changed quite a bit during the last decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can actually do most of those accents. Although, they do get a bit muddled if I try to do them in rapid succession. Most of the friends of my youth have long been used to my switching off dialects for no reason. I even had a chance to do it for an (employed, working) actor once. I told him to name an accent and I'd do it. He stumped me on Scottish.

There was an story on This American Life a LONG time ago about southern accents in film and how bad they are. (The difference between life and "lahf" or time and "tahm". I consider English/British and American Southern to be the most closely related in sheer variety and geographical tells.

ETA: One accent I've never been able to tackle in spite of the fact I lived with a native speaker for years is Swedish. I just don't understand how they make those sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy