Jump to content

Shutter Island


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

What a confusing piece of garbage. I don't want to spoil people so what can I say? God. I was disappointed. Good thing I was drunk. I did enjoy the music and it was well directed, but the performances (especially Leo and that dreadful accent) were terrible. Didn't evoke the time period at all in terms of performance. The casting of Michelle Williams killed this film for me. I'd have to go into spoilers to reveal why.

Anyone else see this? I want to know what the SON posters thought!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes him. Is he considered to be a big star? I was expecting someone else next to Leo. What is he known for? I thought he was very sexy and masculine and fit the vibe of the film perfectly. He felt natural, unlike DeCaprio who was clearly acting. Still can't believe how obvious the turnaround was. Does the book have the same ending as the film? Loved the fantasy opening scenes on the ferry. Reminded me of the artificial outdoor sets you'd get in a classic film. I thought that worked well. My only real complaints were some of the performances, the script and that ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't seen it yet, so I can't comment, but I believe Laeta changed the ending of the novel to a more ambiguous one. This kind of film is so out of Scorsese's usual basket of themes and stories, it seems almost as if he did this for "fun", just to take a break. I am really happy, if it turns out to be a real project, that his next film will be adaptation of Shusaku Endo's Silence.

Ruffalo had several roles in rom-coms, but also had notable roles in crime thrillers such as Zodiac and Collateral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

I enjoyed this movie (although the first half makes no sense as you are watching it), but the ending ties up most of the loose ends. I do have some problems though.....

I felt the score for this movie was borderline cheesy. Like its what you expect from a low-grade B horror flick.... something waiting around the corner for you at every turn. It was really overdone... I think that was perhaps the point, but it takes away substance which I would much prefer. I watch soaps for that kind of nonsense, not a big budget hollywood film.

Also, maybe its just me, but I feel Leonardo DiCaprio is really going downhill as an actor. I think his constant working with Scorsese has made him very lazy as an actor.... and I noticed it in Revolutionary Road, and I really noticed it here.... he has not aged well at all. I know that's superficial of me, but considering how good looking he used to be its a real downer. Back to the laziness though, I have a very hard time differentiating his characters.... they seem to bleed together. They aren't particularly well written and they are rather uninteresting. I imagine most of his roles the last 4 or 5 years have been written specifically for him and that could perhaps be a reason why they fall extremely flat.

Overall very good film for this time of year, but as I suspected there was a reason why its release was pushed back. It will be totally forgotten come summer.

**1/2 out of ****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Maxim https://www.facebook.com/reel/4165068087116271  
    • I think Steve and Shawn track down Kevin and Jeffrey gives them one dose on the sly in exchange for keeping it quiet. John's organs will go to Bo. We know he's not really coming home. Xander won't make the board meeting so EJ will get the hospital by default. And Kate will tell Xander that Sarah lied to him precisely because she feared he would do something like this to Philip  Those are my Friday predictions! Was a good show. I felt Philip's fear in that last scene.
    • @MaximBoth of Diana Ross's daughter are so talented but also they are a hoot! Check Tracee out here. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIgzye6xqYQ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And now all the episodes are gone. SMH. These jackasses never stop 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Not much happened today. But @brisbydog, all of our wish came true: no Leo this week

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess Susan was necessary today, but I really wish she’d leave. Marlena putting EJ on blast about Belle was pretty good though, and I hope they continue to use Marlena in their storyline. I’m interested in seeing what happens to EJelle in the aftermath of the John storyline. And I really wish we were seeing Paul and Andrew moving in on John’s location. If they can’t get Christopher Sean on the show, they should at least try to get Colton Little.  I liked how smart Xander was today and that he immediately that Philip stole the drug. He did a pretty good job in his scenes where he confronted Philip as well. I also appreciate the way that Philip’s been written lately; more like a tragic hero than a bratty, goofy clown. Which is all the more reason that I hope the triangle with Stephanie and Alex is revived. But Xander did seem a little overly melodramatic in his last scene though And, I can’t help but think that Dr. Russell being so hesitant about involving the police in the drug theft could be a sign of something. 
    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy