Jump to content

Y&R: Shocking Role Recast


Recommended Posts

  • Members

In my personal life, it wouldn't happen. However, if I was being paid thousands of dollars to do it as part of my job, I'd have my tongue so far down her throat she'd be sh!tting taste buds for weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 899
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

How many of us have seen someone react hysterically to the very sight of an insect or a rodent? The very sight of it induces a blind hysteria that causes them to jump on a table and scream. This is a phobic reaction. Engen's reaction to a gay kiss is the same exact thing. Yes, it's understandable. But the fault usually lies with the person's reaction. What bothers me is that people seem to think this irrational behavior should be coddled, placated and accepted. This is homophobia folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It should be coddled because apparently, if he didn't flee the scene screaming "GOD HATES FAGS!" it's not really homophobia. Also, insert your bias here, such as: "Y&R is not a good show, Adam's character has been ruined, and Chris was just acting to protect his artistic integrity." Whether or not the show is good, whether or not Adam's character has been ruined, these things are not the point. The point is, he was asked to kiss a man, and his 'experience of limitation' told him he could not do it. That is homophobia, no matter how soft-spoken, no matter how eloquent.

Easy for him to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cashton...I agree with every word you write here EXCEPT...

... how do we know the KISS is why Engen quit? Even it if is the KISS, how do we know that is not the culmination of a bunch of stuff, Frank Beaty-like, that was driving him nuts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark, you have four paragraphs of equivocation and rambling here and not once is he willing to address the kiss outright. All he does talk about is his kid having to see him do "stuff," and his own experience of intolerance as some kind of benign personality trait that makes us all individuals - hooray for intolerance! Unless he decides to release another manifesto after the material begins to air, I think it's safe to read between the lines here. He is championing his choice not to be involved in a storyline with Rafe. That is not a tragic case like Frank Beaty, who came in, did his job, and was exploited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I deserve better than to be forced to do something that I don’t feel is right on many levels, and that should have nothing to do with the choices that other people make.

We don't know what the kiss is an expression of. If Adam kisses Rafe with only the intentions of toying with his feelings and stringing him along just so that he (Rafe) can be a pawn in his (Adam's) whacktastic schemes, then I personally don't see that as an "expression of sexuality." It's an expression of scheming, conniving, using, and abusing.

IMO, it fits perfectly into the reports the he "doesn't like the dark direction" that the character of Adam has been going in. After reading his statement a few times, I don't believe he's homophobic anymore than I did before, but I also don't feel like he addressed the situation enough. Hopefully Ma says something about it soon, and even if she doesn't, I'm anxious to see where the storyline goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Choices" like homosexuality? I love it when they call it a choice. It's still homophobia. And no, Chris, you don't deserve better when you signed a contract like everyone else.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know all that. But on the surface, it's still just a kiss. He didn't rape Summer, he didn't roofie Victor and steal his sperm, he didn't beat Neil to death with a liquor bottle and eat his eyes, he didn't bomb anyone. It's just kissing a dude. That's a bridge too far for him - rape, murder, adultery are all fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've said all along that I don't know whether Chris is a homophobe of not. Do I suspect it's very possible? Yes -- but it's not a certainty.

What's interesting to me is how so many people are so quick to say that Chris isn't a homophobe. The fact of that matter is that we've all heard the same information (as far as I know), so for anyone to declare with complete certainty that Engen's on the up and up is interesting to me. Why is that happening? Is it because people see some of themselves and their own beliefs/feelings in Engen, and they're afraid that if Engen's a homophobe, it must mean they're one too? Is the reality of that possibility too tough a pill to swallow? By the way, I'm not talking about any posters here. I'm talking more about some of the vicious people at SoapCentral, LoL. That place has gotten ca-raaayyyyyzeee!

In my personal opinion, we haven't been given enough confirmation of anything to stand completely on one side of the road or the other re: Engen's "fear" of homosexuality, but I will say that if the reports are true, it certainly doesn't paint a pretty picture of him. There's plenty of reason to suspect the worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark - Engen's transition from being labeled a homophobe to his defense of intolerance belies it was about the kiss. He seems to be very self-concious of how he's perceived:

Playing a dark character definitely bothered him, but he's been dark for a while. The kiss is the only beat he's refused to play so far in the s/l. So yeah, it was the kiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For him, I think the difference is that all those other things can be simulated. They can be faked. A kiss, on the other hand... not so much. Even so, nobody twisted his arm to sign a contract, so he has no reason to piss and moan, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, if that's the case...

Damn, we all have to get past this boy :). I swear, I think his cuteness has us obsessing how this could have gone so wrong... Well, speaking for myself.

But, of course, it is EASY to simulate a kiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • GH on Hulu, their Top 15 list, now for the second consecutive day ... #1.
    • From PKWaddle, ex-soap journo & fan & one known only to give good intel, in a post on my FB soap group: #1 Peacock shows 10 of the past 12 weeks DAYS in their TOP 3. #2 DAYS is now more ahead, currently at 10 months & 1 week.
    • Just a little nod, Today would've been Bill Hayes 100th Birthday! He was almost the first Centenarian On A Soap
    • Kevin Kline's description of soap fans makes me laugh.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not to ramble too far off topic but it happens a lot with comics too, especially only wanting to keep cheap talent around and pushing out creative voices. There are some patches where creatives can go to start their own worlds...wish that was true with soaps, but who knows, maybe it can happen someday. I never thought we'd get a new soap this year.
    • Very true & also at least in the case of stand-out HWs, it is fraught with exhaustion & burnout.
    • Plus we are never going to have a Shonda Rhimes, a Dick Wolf, or a Chuck Lorre of daytime -- a single brilliant person who could come in and change the genre -- because Shonda, Dick, or Chuck would only be able to work on one soap opera at a time, not three or four at the same time as they do in primetime.  As long as TPTB insist on the 60-minute format, we will never have another super influential individual like Phillips, Nixon, or Bell.  They simply would never have time to do more than one soap opera at a time and that would stifle their influence overall. Thanks. So maybe this is happening to some degree in other entertainment genres.  I don't keep up with the particular franchises you mentioned, so I was unaware.  I appreciate your perspective.
    • I think it's become more common in other genres in recent decades, as the industry as a whole has collapsed - these are complaints that have been made about creative talents in the MCU, Star Wars, Doctor Who, etc.  The MCU is in that place now as they burnt so much goodwill that even when their new movie got strong reviews, the audience didn't show up - similar to how AW got some praise for their 89-93 material compared to some of the barren years beforehand, but viewers just weren't coming back.  (I know they did return, somewhat, in the JFP run, but not enough to make up for the big budget she used)
    • I mean I really hope so. Still kinda amazed though that it would get by Standards & Practices. A pair that was talked about that I could see it was Jacob Young & that guy who kept changing what name he went by Someone Martines at least part of the time, but at any rate Jacob was playing Lucky & this other guy was playing Nikolas.
    • Excellent explication. That doing it in these two examples, is not like doing it in other similar genres or franchises, so one could easily postulate that the people who hire do not generally consider "newbies" but instead insist upon experienced people, which leads to rehiring rather than hiring from "outside" which is what your closed system is all about.  When you think about it how many people can you name who did soaps who came from outside? I can only think of 3 HWs : Pete Lemay, Hogan Sheffer & Michael Malone. For EPs only 2: Wendy Riche & Linda Gottlieb    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy