Jump to content

A conversation with Daniel Goddard ( Y&R's Cane )


Recommended Posts

  • Members

A conversation with soap star, Daniel Goddard, who throws out the first pitch for the Hens Sunday

By RYAN E. SMITH

BLADE STAFF WRITER

Daniel Goddard is not who you think he is.

He’s a daytime soap star with a background in finance. He’s a celebrity who enjoys photographing homeless people.

So perhaps it makes sense that this afternoon, even though he’s never attended a baseball game, the native Australian will throw out the first pitch for the Mud Hens.

Goddard, 37, who plays Cane Ashby on The Young and the Restless, will be on hand for Sunday's 2 p.m. game as part of the team’s Mother’s Day festivities, signing autographs and offering photo ops.

Fans of the show already know why he was named the sexiest man on soaps last year by TV Guide Network, but there’s more to be said about the thoughtful, enthusiastic actor than just that. He recently spoke with The Blade by phone about his upcoming visit, how he got into acting, and why soap operas are a metaphor for life.

Q: Your bio says that you enjoy quantitative mathematics and that you study the stock market ...

A: The thing that is funny about that is that when I was about 17, about 16-17, my parents sort of wanted me to get into finance and I always wanted to act. And so I kind of appeased my parents and I went to university, studied economics, and I also went and did a course on the Australian stock market ... I had one subject left and I quit. And the thing is that with the hindsight now being 50-50, I realize that I made the right choice.

Q: Soaps have always been kind of escapist in nature. How important do you think that is these days?

A: It’s so essential. You look at any form of entertainment. I mean, you look at the concept of a feature film. You go into a big dark room with a bunch of people. You have this one collective energy in this dark environment focusing on this one point on the wall, you know, and that’s a very powerful medium. And then people get swept up in the emotion. They go on that escapist journey. ... And I think that people, when they have their own trials and tribulations and their own downturns and emotional roller coasters in life, they like to escape to that. So it’s very important. I think that soaps [are] one of the true and tested mediums for that.

Q: In soaps there are all kinds of crazy twists and turns that take place ... How seriously are you able to take your character and your acting with all of that?

A: You know what’s funny about that? My character has a huge twist and turn coming up ... The thing about soaps that’s so difficult is that you never know where you’re going. You don’t know what’s going to happen, but the irony of that is that it’s a metaphor for life because you don’t know where you’re going next.

Q: Going back to your early days when you made the switch to acting, how did you do that?

A: The most difficult part was telling my dad, who wanted me to have everything he never had. ... My dad worked like 11 days straight with a couple days off to provide for the family. So when I said, “Hey I’m leaving and I’m going to go and pursue acting,” which is one of those jobs that you just never know, you know, because acting is such a strange animal. Because you may be the greatest actor in the world, but if you’re not a good auditioner you’ll never get the job.

Q: What kind of training did you have after you left school?

A: I left school and I went to an acting school in Australia, which was the equivalent of the Actor’s Studio, and you learn that basically you need to make a choice when you look at a scene. The first thing you do is you say to yourself, what is this scene about? ... They call it acting, but technically it’s reacting. ... You learn that everything is merely about listening and then when you listen and you hear what the person says, it should cue what you say, your dialogue...

Q: What do you see as your career path now? Do you see yourself sticking with daytime television?

A: I really enjoy where I’m at right now. I have a 3-year-old; I also have a 4-month-old son. I have two boys. It allows me to be based in LA. Like, 10 minutes ago I was laying in bed with my 3-year-old who woke up early, and I was just laying there telling him a story and then I came down here to talk to you. It allows me to do that. It allows me to be with my family, and I think at this stage in my life and in their life and in this economy especially it’s lovely to have stability.

Q: What kinds of things do you do in your downtime?

A: I’m a huge auto racing fan. I raced last year in the Pro/Celebrity Long Beach Grand Prix, which ... was one of the greatest, greatest experiences of my life. ... I’m a huge photographer ... For about 15 years now I photograph homeless people — women, predominantly women who work in subsistence or third world economies. ... I’ve got a book I’m putting together so I’m real excited about that.

Q: Why have you decided on the portraits that you do?

A: Most people that you meet will blanket or mask the truth of their day-to-day grind with a face of either valor or something else. You’ll never really get to know what it is they feel. But I mean, I’ve met so many homeless people. I’ve caught a lot of candid portraits and they’ll turn and at the moment they turn I’ll take the shot and you can see in the eyes of the people, you see everything.

Q: Since this will be your first ball game ... do you have anyone who’s sort of coaching you on how this is all going to work?

A: No, no. I’d love to throw the first pitch. I haven’t even gone to anybody about that yet. I’ve heard some people go and throw a pitch at the Dodgers game or something. I’m like, “Really? You get to throw the baseball?” I’m like, should I be audacious enough to be like, “Can I throw the ball? I just hope I don’t hurt anybody in the stands because in cricket we bowl the ball, we don’t pitch it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

He didn't do it as a "celebrity". He was trying to use his gift for photography (which is genuine) to capture something many of us are able to get away without seeing much.

I saw his pics somewhere (Michael Fairman?), and I must confess they did a remarkably good job of bringing out the inherent dignity of his subjects.

ETA: It was Nelson Branco.

Here is a slideshow

http://tvguide.sympatico.msn.ca/Galleries/...SPICS&pos=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What? No pic in your post

Nah, he's a good bloke, and that's how he should be written.

A. He shouldn't be a businessman? Fixed it...he runs a bar now.

B. His romance with Lily doesn't work? Fixed it...he seems to be headed toward Mac.

C. His retcon as P3 is offensive? I think we need to live with that...can't have too many DNA undoings. But I think his next story -- whatever that is -- will do some repair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
    • I do think there's room for optimism, especially with Amazon making enough new episodes to last until December. There's still time for the various players to get their ducks in a row. Guess we'll know soon enough! 
    • I do agree it's better to just have people pop back into town. I never understood why Roger needed a mask on an island, when neither Fletcher or Alex would've known who he was. And the vine...sigh. Couldn't he have just been sent crashing through a window or something?
    • When the announcement was first made, I did wonder if other plans were in the works. I guess we can always keep hoping, especially as the show has a small core cast.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy