Jump to content

Y&R: In Support of Melody Thomas Scott


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Then what's the difference between being used under a trail basis and being under contract? Wouldn't it be the same situation, being paid by episode, only contracted writers are tied to the show under binding legal terms?

Or maybe each writer is guaranteed a certain number of episodes to write before their contract cycle is up, and they get paid accordingly.

Regardless, MAB doesn't need all those writers anyway, no matter how much they get paid per episode.

But episode guarantees and money are two separate situations with contracts sometimes. They can get a fixed salary, but only guaranteed to work a certain number of days per week. Some actors with clout might not want to work as much as other actors, and that's been done before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Okay, what is the lineup now? Do I have it right below? So the BDW/SW ranks are fine...indeed, maybe they are short one SW, right?

The only places that "look" inflated are the second co-HW and that middle rank of AHW. But, I mean, this part of the lineup has been stable for a year. Clearly, it is working for them, structurally, right? Why are people sweating this extra 1-2 writers? Sure, it adds a bit of expense, but we also comment on what a well-produced and coordinated show Y&R is. So why are people even worrying about it??

HW

Maria Arena Bell

Co-HW

Hogan Sheffer

Scott Hamner

AHW

Natalie Minardi Slater

Marla Kanelos

Beth Milstein

BDW

Tom Casiello

Lisa Connor

Amanda Beall

Paula Cwikly

Jay Gibson

SW

Eric Freiwald & Linda Schreiber

Janice Ferri Esser

Sandra Weintraub

Teresa Zimmerman

But, back to MTS. You could probably ditch 3-4 of the people above, and still not get to 40% of MTS' salary, right? So again, does it matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You can justify MTS salary if you use her and have her carry a major story. It doesn't make sense to pay her a million dollars while Nikki just sits in the Athletic Club and moons over Victor. It's awfully silly to have Victor, Ashley and Nikki on canvas and not play the triangle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess if we weren't in a crappy economy I would say I agree with your post wholeheartedly. I am upset about this as well but before anyone starts talking about what should and can be done, people really need to go take a look at Sony's and CBS's financial statements!! Really look at them. Not a whole lot of happy shareholders!! Especially on the CBS side of things. Contrary to the stories probably being spun, Y&R isn't probably doing as great as it should be not from the standpoint of what it used to be and how CBS/Sony looks at it.

So this MTS issue is probably just the tip of the iceberg sad to say. I can barely discuss this subject because I am so bloody :angry: but from a financial standpoint for both CBS & Sony, I truly do get it and probably would advise them to figure out where their most cost savings are. And usually those savings come from "people". It sucks but it is what it is. Every company out there is doing it.

Hopefully economy will turn probably not this year but next and advertising will come back and we won't be going through this so much...hopefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not a black & white situation. It's math!

I don't know what the real numbers are so I'll plug some in just for illustration's sake.

These numbers are all just made up: Y&R has 1.5 million per week to spend on it's show. Each cast member has the potential to bring a certian number of fans to the show, DEPENDING on story. I know Sharon Case has fans who will turn on the show to watch her. However, it also depends on her story. If SC has something juicy, that will bring 100,000 fans to the show, while if SC is just in the background making cocoa for Noah that drops to 25,000. I don't know what the math is for MTS but one can assume that Nikki in a good story could bring a lot of old-time Nikki fans back to the show.

If the writers though are incapable of writing a major & hot story for Nikki, then keeping her doesn't make sense. That said, there's something amiss with the writing staff if they can't write something good MTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, lately, it's likely they used her minimally because of the need to potentially write her out.

According to the resource archive, in

2008 = 169 episodes (Rank = 3)

2007 = 140 episodes (Rank = 9)

2006 = 123 episodes (Rank = 17)

2005 = 139 episodes (Rank = 12)

So, she actually did VERY WELL under MAB in MAB's first year. Think of all she did: (a) Victoria's protector during the coma; (B) David Chow; © Kay's chief mourner; (d) Mexico and Paris arcs; and (e) Paul romance. She got plenty of play...more even when she was one of the lynchpins of Clear Springs and the Senate...so I think we can assume that MAB would invest in her if she could.

YTD in 2009, in the first five months (out of 103 episodes) she had 40 appearances and was rank #18. If we extrapolate over the whole year, we can expect only about 100 appearances. That is a SIGNIFICANT DROP. Moreover, Nikki has been trivialized in story. I could imagine that Melody wants to guard against that continuing.

Let's assume she HAD a 100-episode guarantee. Let's assume, as the data above show, that she was used ABOVE her guarantee (quite substantially).

Now, if they are proposing (say) a 40% cut in the guarantee, that brings her down to 60 episodes. Even if they INTEND to use her above her guarantee...if they can't (because of lean times)...that means she might only appear once a week. That's hardly worth showing up.

Never mind the $$ loss. The bigger deal is that the character becomes irrelevant. That is such a come-down for the character, I would respect her integrity for not wanting Nikki trivialized thus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This I agree with, and I blame the writers for not playing more beats to that story.

MarkH when you break down the writers like that it doesn't seem so bad. Whomever said that MAB has all these writers to cover her failures, I doubt it. Nobody really pays attention to those writers, she's the headliner for Y&R, and she herself claims responsibility for it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know this sounds crazy but I'll throw it out there since it's never going happen now. In my heart of hearts, I wanted a quad with Nikki/Victor/Ashley/CE's Adam. I know -- sounds crazy, LOL, and probably a bit freaky but I thought it would have been the kind of story that gets a lot of buzz, it would have this weird Oedipal element times two, Victor facing his own mortality [because that's really the terror that Adam produces in Victor], and both of these women who have always worshiped & adored Victor being giving the chance to "redo" their relationships with a younger version of him and in that way, recapture their own youth.

That said, I am so excited about what AMC is doing with Erica. I won't spoil it in this thread though it's gonna be hard for folks to miss because the AP picked up the plot twist.

Mark, you're right about MTS leaving while still on top of her game. I don't want Nikki reduced to some once a week supporting player. Nikki it the closest Y&R comes to Erica Kane. If she's not going to the star diva, it would be painful to watch her turn into Lauren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This may have been discussed already and I missed it but the talk of her pay in this doesn't make sense if you believe all of Nelson's report. He says in Friday's Suds Report that Y&R wants her to go recurring. Salary and stuff won't matter at all if she goes recurring. There won't be a contract. It is just up to her agreeing to go recurring and being paid and used just when Y&R needs her.

So basically they were giving her two options. If she wants to keep her current pay then she has to go to recurring. If that happens, I doubt we will hardly ever see Nikki. And if they are even thinking recurring status is possible, that means to me that there is no real story planned for Mel in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Maybe Guza is becoming Y&R Head writer and Jilly will be named EP! Remember CBS installed Latham as consultant and later Mal Young, both of whom took over the show. Of course, they each got credit during the consulting days.
    • Don't forget Carrie, who as Carrie2 was screwing everything in pants, and PPD Reva, who to either get back at Josh for his supposed affair with Vanessa (or just to prove she's more desirable than Van) tries to screw half the male population.
    • Post-production isn't exactly akin to sweeping the floors, but it makes more sense given her CV.  And, it would invalidate any concerns that she has an undo influence on the creative process, as opposed to visual and sound design of the show.  In fact, given her interests, it makes sense that she would want to consult and see the impact of newer technology in a post-production facility.  I could only imagine how much has changed in sound technology since she worked on SB, and that might be intriguing to utilize. As well as their impending move (not as soon as B&B, but we all know it will happen) and helping set up post-production at the new facility. 
    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy