Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

  • Member
54 minutes ago, Contessa Donatella said:

You got a problem? Not at all from Lemay. Her own account, on the AWHP. 

Donna is this you?  I enjoy chatting with you but your response here is unnecessarily aggressive. 

Edited by Efulton

  • Replies 14.5k
  • Views 3.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Mona Kane Croft said:

Sorry, I misunderstood. I assumed you were referencing Lemay's book. So, was this from her daytime magazine interview or something like that?   Maybe I even misunderstood your entire post.  But does throwing things out of her closet have anything do to with Dwyer's acting skills?   Again, Donna -- I may have misunderstood your post, and maybe even misinterpreted your intent.   

Cool, no problem. It relates to her identity as Mary Matthews. And, that is something that an actor might feel. But, I'm not sure what you're looking for either. 

1 minute ago, Efulton said:

Donna is this you?  I enjoy chatting with you but your response here is unnecessarily aggressive. 

Yes, it's me. That was play. May not have gone over. 

  • Member
1 minute ago, Contessa Donatella said:

Cool, no problem. It relates to her identity as Mary Matthews. And, that is something that an actor might feel. But, I'm not sure what you're looking for either. 

Yes, it's me. That was play. May not have gone over. 

Ok thanks for clarifying!!  All good!  😀

  • Member
12 minutes ago, vetsoapfan said:

I don't specifically recall him saying he took her favorite seat, LOL, but I do remember him spinning a tall tale about how she was so intent on making herself seen by the public.

It's somehow worse than that -- I just looked it up and he entirely absolves himself of taking her seat intentionally ("I had apparently appropriated the wall seat she usually occupied"), but sneers at Dwyer both for his assumption that she would have preferred his seat in order to let her public gaze upon her but also for his idea that she was more than consoled by the fact that the seat she got allowed her to gaze at her reflection in a mirror. He mocks her to the reader for graciously signing autographs for fans before she arrives at the table, for bringing fan mail to show him how popular she is with the audience, for drinking sherry, for claiming that she understood her character and her fans' appreciation of her, and for daring to disagree with his assessment that the character was unrealistic. Then he insults her to her face by telling her she is an inexperienced actress and makes up his mind to write Mary out.

Just now, Efulton said:

Ok thanks for clarifying!!  All good!  😀

EESH. Did I phuck up? Sorry, Mona, that was not real aggression. Wheee. 

It's just an anecdote I have always loved. She looked in her closet & every single garment seemed like MARY MARY MARY & she says she tossed her whole closet & went shopping the next day. 

  • Member
4 minutes ago, vetsoapfan said:

It certainly is an entertaining read!

If multiple people were stopping Dwyer to ask for autographs as she entered a small restaurant, perhaps Lemay should have recognized something important about that, rather than using it as a way to ridicule the obviously very popular actress.  Dear God in Heaven!!

7 minutes ago, Contessa Donatella said:

EESH. Did I phuck up? Sorry, Mona, that was not real aggression. Wheee. 

It's just an anecdote I have always loved. She looked in her closet & every single garment seemed like MARY MARY MARY & she says she tossed her whole closet & went shopping the next day. 

Hey Countess -- you and I are soap opera friends now.  Seriously, we are.  We will occasionally disagree, and perhaps even have a few serious disagreements. Frankly, I believe about 85% of the time, we AGREE.  But my intent is to always respond to your posts with respect, and no ridicule.  I am not a member of the Nasty-Girls Club.  LOL.   

I'm sure this is all understood, but I just wanted to verify.   

  • Member
2 minutes ago, Xanthe said:

It's somehow worse than that -- I just looked it up and he entirely absolves himself of taking her seat intentionally ("I had apparently appropriated the wall seat she usually occupied"), but sneers at Dwyer both for his assumption that she would have preferred his seat in order to let her public gaze upon her but also for his idea that she was more than consoled by the fact that the seat she got allowed her to gaze at her reflection in a mirror. He mocks her to the reader for graciously signing autographs for fans before she arrives at the table, for bringing fan mail to show him how popular she is with the audience, for drinking sherry, for claiming that she understood her character and her fans' appreciation of her, and for daring to disagree with his assessment that the character was unrealistic. Then he insults her to her face by telling her she is an inexperienced actress and makes up his mind to write Mary out.

Thank you for refreshing my memory. He really was caustic and condescending towards people whom he decided to vilify, LOL.

People try to argue with me that Lemay did not have the power to fire Dwyer, and technically that was probably true; he needed the approval of TPTB. But with relentless determination to fire an actress he disliked, it's clear he was a prime motivating factor in her dismissal.

After Jacquie Courtney was fired, she wrote a magazine piece about leaving the show, trying diplomatically to say that she did not agree with the way TPTB were taking her character. Lemay later wrote that she may have had it "written for her." Huh? As if she were incapable of stringing sentences together in a  text like anybody else? His snide insults are hard to fathom.

15 minutes ago, Mona Kane Croft said:

If multiple people were stopping Dwyer to ask for autographs as she entered a small restaurant, perhaps Lemay should have recognized something important about that, rather than using it as a way to ridicule the obviously very popular actress.  Dear God in Heaven!!

It makes me wonder (again) why Bill Bell killed off Jennifer Brooks on Y&R in 1977. Generally, soaps are loathe to kill off the principal matriarch unless they have no choice whatsoever (i.e. death of the actress).

At least AW held on to Aunt Liz and Ada for a long time.

On 2/28/2024 at 9:03 AM, vetsoapfan said:

I daresay that certain debates will rage on forever among internet commentators:

https://neal.fun/lets-settle-this/

For soap fans, in particular, viewers have been rehashing and debating Maureen Bauer's death on TGL for decades. Ditto: "Who was the better Rachel on AW: Strasser or Wyndham?" And, "Do sci-fi and camp elements belong on daytime TV?" Not to mention, "Should ailing, long-suffering soaps just be cancelled and put out of their misery?" 

Somehow my new text got squished into the quoted material. Here below is what I added. (This is really weird.) 

On 2/28/2024 at 9:03 AM, vetsoapfan said:

Who was: Best Just Marley? Best Just Vicky? Best Both?

Is it true that as a soap opera writer James Lipton was excellent as the host of Inside the Actor's Studio?

Is it true that as Donna Love Philece Sampler, May she rest in peace, was the best Renee Dumonde DiMera ever?

Did Ellen Wheeler give us 4 more years of a soap we love or did she blah blah blah? 

Was Victoria Wyndham the star of the show or was it an ensemble? 

When Angela Shapiro sent Linda Dano from one ABC soap to another did the HWs hate it?

 

 

31 minutes ago, Mona Kane Croft said:

Hey Countess -- you and I are soap opera friends now.  Seriously, we are.  We will occasionally disagree, and perhaps even have a few serious disagreements. Frankly, I believe about 85% of the time, we AGREE.  But my intent is to always respond to your posts with respect, and no ridicule.  I am not a member of the Nasty-Girls Club.  LOL.   

I'm sure this is all understood, but I just wanted to verify.   

Our being fast AW buddies cannot be reiterated too much! 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
uh-oh

  • Member
26 minutes ago, vetsoapfan said:

It makes me wonder (again) why Bill Bell killed off Jennifer Brooks on Y&R in 1977. Generally, soaps are loathe to kill off the principal matriarch unless they have no choice whatsoever (i.e. death of the actress).

 

I too have questioned Bell's decision to kill-off Jennifer Brooks.  But I have a tendency to respect big decisions like that, if they are made by the show's creator, rather than later writers.   Similarly, I fairly easily accepted Bell's decision to write-off Y&R's two original families, the Brooks' and the Fosters, only because that decision was made by Bill Bell himself.  

Had a later writer made those decisions, I would still be bitching about it 40 years later.   Just as I still bitch about Lemay killing-off Mary Matthews, or the Bauers being minimized while Pam Long was head-writer, or the Martins being minimized every time Agnes Nixon came and went from All My Children, or the way the Hortons were minimized by every head-writer post-1983.   

Edited by Mona Kane Croft

19 minutes ago, vetsoapfan said:

Thank you for refreshing my memory. He really was caustic and condescending towards people whom he decided to vilify, LOL.

People try to argue with me that Lemay did not have the power to fire Dwyer, and technically that was probably true; he needed the approval of TPTB. But with relentless determination to fire an actress he disliked, it's clear he was a prime motivating factor in her dismissal.

After Jacquie Courtney was fired, she wrote a magazine piece about leaving the show, trying diplomatically to say that she did not agree with the way TPTB were taking her character. Lemay later wrote that she may have had it "written for her." Huh? As if she were incapable of stringing sentences together in a  text like anybody else? His snide insults are hard to fathom.

It makes me wonder (again) why Bill Bell killed off Jennifer Brooks on Y&R in 1977. Generally, soaps are loathe to kill off the principal matriarch unless they have no choice whatsoever (i.e. death of the actress).

At least AW held on to Aunt Liz and Ada for a long time.

Now, I've read this. It's in the book Lee Bell got Michael Maloney to write "with her". Gonna have to look it up. But, I believe I can satisfy this particular curiosity. 

Just looked down, 9 people here. 

  • Member
3 minutes ago, Mona Kane Croft said:

I too have questioned Bell's decision to kill-off Jennifer Brooks.  But I have a tendency to respect big decisions like that, if they are made by the show's creator, rather than later writers.   Similarly, I fairly easily accepted Bell's decision to write-off Y&R's two original families, the Brooks' and the Fosters, only because that decision was made by Bill Bell himself.   Had a later writer made that decision, I would still be bitching about it 40 years later.   

With the endless cast defections among the actors playing the Brooks and Foster characters, I can understand Bill Bell finally throwing up his hands and deciding to start over with a largely-clean slate. He was William J. Bell; he was soap-savvy and creative enough to make it work. Other (and lesser) writers and producers over the years, who tried to reinvent classic soaps, just never had the ability to succeed.

Instead of introducing and then axing so many new characters and families over the years, AW should have concentrated on strengthening its roots and returning Bay City to its core.

I would have worked for them, cheaply, LOL!

  • Member
7 minutes ago, vetsoapfan said:

With the endless cast defections among the actors playing the Brooks and Foster characters, I can understand Bill Bell finally throwing up his hands and deciding to start over with a largely-clean slate. He was William J. Bell; he was soap-savvy and creative enough to make it work. Other (and lesser) writers and producers over the years, who tried to reinvent classic soaps, just never had the ability to succeed.

Instead of introducing and then axing so many new characters and families over the years, AW should have concentrated on strengthening its roots and returning Bay City to its core.

I would have worked for them, cheaply, LOL!

Of course! When Lemay left AW in 1979 the show was populated with wonderful characters with so much potential -- the middle-class Matthews family, the wealthy Corys, the working-class Perrinis and Frames, and all the wonderful characters that surrounded them.    Even if the new writers wanted to strengthen the storylines and plots, why in the world would they jettison so many of Lemay's beloved characters??   It was nuts, and led to the continued ratings decline for twenty-years.   

  • Member
3 minutes ago, Mona Kane Croft said:

Of course! When Lemay left AW in 1979 the show was populated with wonderful characters with so much potential -- the middle-class Matthews family, the wealthy Corys, the working-class Perrinis and Frames, and all the wonderful characters that surrounded them.    Even if the new writers wanted to strengthen the storylines and plots, why in the world would they jettison so many of Lemay's beloved characters??   It was nuts, and led to the continued ratings decline for twenty-years.   

Yep.👍

34 minutes ago, vetsoapfan said:

With the endless cast defections among the actors playing the Brooks and Foster characters, I can understand Bill Bell finally throwing up his hands and deciding to start over with a largely-clean slate. He was William J. Bell; he was soap-savvy and creative enough to make it work. Other (and lesser) writers and producers over the years, who tried to reinvent classic soaps, just never had the ability to succeed.

 

And remember this came at the time when CBS forced him to go to an hour. Each & every person was signed to contracts that specified a half hour. Automatically, on the exact same day, no one had a contract. They'd been on this hot new soap & suddenly they might have thought they'd find a better role or a bigger paycheck. But, you may know this ... 

Okay, sorry. What I read about is Jamie Lyn Bauer & Lorie. Why he didn't feel he could recast her. etc. 

Maloney, M., & Bell, L. P. (2012). The Young and Restless Life 0f William J. Bell. Sourcebooks, Inc.

Excerpts from

p.38

Irna & Bill co-created Another World. The show bible dated 8-26-63 is 24 pages long. "In a community not too far from Oakdale, a community near the university -- one that is certainly not what we usually think of as suburbia but not completely cosmopolitan either -- live two families," Irna & Bill wrote.

"As far as Another World is concerned, we believe that in some way we all create 'another world' for ourselves. If we didn't, facing reality 24 hours a day would be too much. But as for another world for women, we feel that the viewer, who we hope will come to know all the people to whom you've been introduced will recognize in this story that a home and a family should be solidified & not attached."

Creating AW also provided valuable lessons. "It was a whole new level of learning," Bill said of starting an original daytime series. Another World, which Rose Cooperman titled & which chronicled the lives of the Matthews family.

Bill & Irna left AW & James Lipton came in but then he also left & Agnes Nixon came in. Her Alice/Steve/Rachel triangle put the show on the map.

"Aggie did a fabulous job with that show," praised Bill.

Maloney, M., & Bell, L. P. (2012). The Young and Restless Life 0f William J. Bell. Sourcebooks, Inc.

Michael Maloney's Bill Bell book p. 255 Retirement speech. From the Rainbow Room, 1998.

"I have a deep conviction about the state of the serial today, although it does not relate to all of them," Bill stated. But it relates to the need to create stories that an audience can relate to, stories that deal with real people, that have real problems & real relationships, God willing, that can impact positively on the lives of our viewers. Enough said."

p.262 "I'm quite clear that Bill believed he owed his success to his

partnership with Lee," says Susan Seaforth Hayes. "Who knows where ideas for a writer come from? Those little geniuses that whisper into your ear & make stories & scenes into scripts of gold. Maybe it was because the person sitting beside him was not belittling, but was instead enthusiastic about his every achievement. I would not be a bit surprised if that fountain of work came out of a perfect love. Bill Bell was one human being in a million who had the grace to share his success & say that it came out of his marriage to Lee. How great was that?

"She was the most difficult person I ever met who was in this business." - Paul Rauch, Emmy-winning producer of AW, OLTL, GL, SB, Y&R, FR/FP, about Irna Phillips. Michael Maloney Bill Bell book

"Rita Marshall, the no-nonsense soap opera producer of fictional Southwest General in the film TOOTSIE was modeled after Gloria Monty, the iconic and iron-willed producer who helmed General Hospital in its heyday." - Michael Maloney Bill Bell book p. 29.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.