Jump to content

B&B: Daytimes Biggest Clusterf*ck?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yep, we're totally on the same page. B&B is 'the same'...some people don't like the rehashed storylines...but I find them comforting. Ridge, Brooke, Eric and Stephanie are still there...so are Thorne, Taylor and Felicia. Jackie is a diva, which the show has always had...Nick is a tool...which the show has always had. Katie, Donna, Rick and Stephie aren't offensive to me.

What can I say...I've never expected B&B to be as solid as Y&R...it's fun and light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've had this conversation before with a friend. We both agreed you can be fun and light and still be credible. The problem is, B&B treats itself like a joke on purpose. It wasn't always this way, but over the past 5-7 years, they've been going down this road. No one can tell me this show doesn't go out of its way to purposely land itself a segment on The Soup.

Look at what Santa Barbara was at its peak. That show had a sense of humour, often didn't take itself too seriously, yet it was intelligent and never treated its audience as idiots, not to mention it was a critics darling. I don't see why B&B can't be half as good or try to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gosh, how I sincerely love your posts.

The way you drizzle out these nuggets. "Lee Bell Summit"? If true, that is a whole other level...Lee convenes the family and asserts control? Could it be true? What a cool image...let's hope she has an effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B really does seem like a telenovela, or at least Port Charles when they did their lil' arc stories. When B&B starts a completely new storyline (not just a Brooke/Ridge/Taylor rehash), they go at it full-steam ahead! The storyline suddenly becomes THE storyline of the show for a solid 3-4 weeks, depending on how massive the story arc is. Sometimes it's a month of bliss (Thorne vs. his family), other times (Bridget/Nick/Katie) it's pure hell. Which goes back to the whole pacing of this show and the pushing of characters and couples to make us try to feel something we don't actually feel for. It's definitely a rollercoaster ride of storyline highs and lows, of extreme frontburner and sudden backburner.

I think their worst/weakest is when they forcefeed brand-new characters in a brand-new coupling. It just screams ''Like them! Care about what happens to them! Please!?!'' And a few weeks later, it's back to Brooke and her latest true love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
    • NBC must have been grateful to have LHOTP, it's only hit and still strong after several seasons. Their next established show was Rockford Files at 45th. They didn't develop any comedies and relied on movies and mini series  which didnt establish viewer loyalty and habits. Their only new hit was mid season's Project UFO which debuted Feb up against Rhoda/On Our Own on CBS and How the West Was Won on ABC. It opened with a strong 36 share beating CBS and close to ABC as HTWWW had a 36 share over 3 hours. The next week UFO saw a respectable 32 share, then a 31 so it was slipping. A 28 share followed but a few weeks later it jumped back up to a 34. So no blockbuster but compared to what else they had, there was potential, So next season NBC sent it to Thursday up against Mork and The Waltons and it bombed.  They were smart to see potential in Chips, which took off on Saturdaysnext season. ABC was on a roll with Love Boat, 3's Company, Taxi, Eight is Enough adding to their hits. Their only real flops were Redd Foxx and San Pedro Beach Bums, an Aaron Spelling misfire. Like Redd Foxx, Harvey Korman was lured to ABC but his series was a filler that did well but was considered a time slot hit. Nancy Walker and Rob Reiner were also given series on the philosophy that not only were they popular names, their absence from popular shows like Sanford, Rhoda and All in the Family might weaken those shows. CBS were relying on old favorites. Betty White was strong the first few weeks then faded. Incredible Hulk was their strongest newbie. It was lucky for CBS that NBC was doing so badly or else some of their weaker shows would have really suffered.
    • That outfit looks like something Martin would wear lol.
    • Omg not we both ran into people from the show this weekend!
    • I guess he was let out the gates, because he's outside. 
    • Yup.  You can hate John all you want, but like seriously he was the cornerstone of the show for years.  So he should get a long ass funeral and burial and all the things because Drake and John deserve that.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      look who’s at a party I’m at
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy