Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

One of the things I've found most disgusting about the "replace Biden" op is the utter lack of respect and appreciation for what Biden is trying to do. He could've retired and spent his days working on his brain cancer foundation. Instead he brought us back from COVID, saved the economy, made real changes in climate policy, etc... and people want to throw him out after one bad night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The media has a long history of doing such things. If you go through archives of newspapers like the New York Times and other centuries old newspapers, you will see racist, sexist, xenophobic rhetoric and commentary in their headlines and in their articles. They have an explicit history of literally being on the wrong side of history. I remember, it being so bad that they had to issue a public apology on their racist reporting on Black people during the pre/post Emancipation period and the era of Jim Crow and the Civil Rights movement.

Yes, it’s scary (more like vexing to me personally) but not surprising for them. Considerably “on brand” for the media, in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Semafor, which is a big Beltway favorite, also has a piece out on how friendly the RNC is being to the media (even though Kari Lake and MTG, two hugely influential figures in the party, hurled abuse at the media). 

They really are trying to commit to the narrative of how safe the GOP is, as they were given such a lifeline with Trump's supposed attack. I wonder if it's working or not. I don't get the sense there's a ton of interest in the convention. I did hear a lot of talk about how dull JD Vance was and how visibly unhappy Trump was as he spoke. 

Speaking of which...

Trump’s campaign has given no official info about his medical care following assassination attempt | PBS News

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't find the comments that led to this but I'm going to take a guess.

Let's be very clear about something, Donald Trump is a threat to the entire world. If that assassination attempt had been successful, half the planet would've breathed a giant sigh of relief, myself included. If that makes me a bad person so be it. If Putin or Xi or MBS got eliminated the world would celebrate. The same is true for Trump.

A lot of folks seem to not understand the concept of us or them. 

Meanwhile the funeral for the guy killed at the Trump rally is today and the press doesn't GAF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just hope people on the inside know exactly what they're buying if a succession happens. Nancy Pelosi is a machine and her only calculus is winning, so if she is actually suggesting Joe go she must know much more than I do. But getting Joe Biden across the finish line against Trump is not the same thing as getting Kamala Harris there. It is not one size fits all, and the fact is that on the ground I suspect a huge portion of the base is still very much behind Joe despite what has gone on online and in Washington. We have all either known or for some of us learned more than once in the last 4-5 years that when it comes to Biden, online is most definitely not the real world.

People are underestimating Biden yet again IMO, even if I feel the WH has handled much of the last few weeks poorly re: criticism and intra-party strife as well as public appearances. But if Joe's luck runs out this time the entire party had all better be prepared to shore up that unhappy base out there in the real world and make it clear Kamala is his heir. This kind of lift at this very late date will take everything we've ever had and more. She does not have the institutional and historical love from casual and disengaged or some yes, stupid voters that Joe has had for decades (the same things those idiots at The Onion now flagellate themselves for promoting because they didn't help Bernie to win a primary). And she has generational racism, sexism and media dislike against her. Not as much as Hillary did, no woman does, but it is going to be a lift. I think we can do it, but it is going to be tough. So if this is what's going down, people better be ready to play hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This country is so racist and sexist, I just struggle to ever see her winning. I don't even know if Obama would win in today's America. She is certainly someone I'd be happy to vote for, I think she'd make a good President, but I don't see it happening. She has had a constant barrage of hate and mockery for years and that will quickly fill the media for those who still don't know who she is (as many don't ever know who the VP is). I tend to wonder how many who are pushing Biden out are in a dream because they live in places like California, where memories of the Tom Bradley loss are presumably far away. I wonder if all those in Congress who are talking about the harm downballot realize how many in their districts and states are too bigoted and misogynist to ever support Harris.

If Biden had had more public support before the debate, then I don't think it would be such a crisis for some in the party, but the bottom fell out around 2021 and many were already willing to dump him if the midterms hadn't gone as well as they did. They seemed to be willing to grit their teeth until the debate. And some still are. Some others do genuinely support him. But those who never did are now, much too late, trying to finally speak up. 

I don't know if his team, or whoever else in the party is with them, still fully understands the pressures or consequences. I saw Politico was claiming that Hillary Scholten, after saying Biden should go, was briefly removed from a Biden campaign and state party effort to elect candidates. Some were cheering this, but she's in a district and a state that there's a very strong chance Biden will lose, so I don't blame her for trying to save herself (it bothers me more when people are nasty about it, like Julian Castro was in the debates). That they didn't see this and instead just created more bad blood for themselves in the party doesn't seem great.

It's a very hellish choice because I think Biden could keep it close, which I can't say for Harris or Gavin Newsom or other potential candidates, but the Biden in debates, or interviews, or struggling to get in a car, is the image people seem likely to remember, and the one repeated back to them every hour of every day. And I don't know if that can be overcome, especially with some of the people around him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In an imaginary world I think Obama can and would take it today, four years ago and four years before that. But he's done and he has every right to be. I do think Joe Biden has been haunted by Obama (allegedly) convincing him to give HIllary the baton in '16, and feeling that if he'd run he'd have won and averted so much of what's come since. I think Joe may be right about that. But we can't change it and we're not there now.

People do not hate Kamala Harris a fraction as much as they ever did Hillary Clinton. But they also don't know her as much. Putting her over to the base will not be difficult IMO, it's the saggy middle or lazy low-info voters that concern me.

I don't see evidence of that back then tbh. I don't remember any drumbeat to get rid of him in those years. But if people really wanted him out the time to mount a case was long ago, and they never did to my notice or a lot of the general public's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've had this thought many times. He didn't have to run in 2020. He could have spent the last four years on Rehobeth Beach with his grandkids. Now here he is in 2024 trying to save us again. I really can't believe Pelosi and Schumer were so open with their opinions. They obvious allowed the news to leak in order to create more pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Schumer was astonishingly bold, but supposedly Biden doesn't trust or at least have a super close relationship with either Schumer or Jeffries so I wasn't entirely surprised. Pelosi works much more carefully. The fact that this is leaking from her is deliberate, and makes me think she must know more than we do. Not about Biden's competency but about numbers.

I can't fault her actions if those numbers are real, but if we all survive this experience there will be a story told one day about how Joe was pushed out and it will likely have many annals of shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, I meant if Obama of 2008 tried to run today. I think the country has become even uglier than it was at that time. I would never expect him to run again even if he was legally able, after what he and his family had to go through.

It's difficult with Kamala because she isn't as hated but also doesn't seem to have the support Hillary had. In an ideal world she could win.

I felt like those plans were in the works if 2022 had gone another way, but the people who want him out now should have been more vocal at the time, yes. They seemed to just give up. I think many were either assuming Trump wouldn't get back in (bad idea) or were fine with Biden running and losing so they wouldn't have to face Trump themselves. Only lately has something - bad poll numbers for them rather than just him, it seems - shaken them up. But they need to ask themselves how many of the voters they do have left might be demoralized if they push Biden out. All of this is just a mess and makes me wonder who is even in charge. I don't want the party to be run by thugs and sociopaths craving power at all costs, like the GOP, but we shouldn't have gotten to this point. Whispers and nudges aren't enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I liked the food poisoning angle on Thursday because I said beforehand that I would be annoyed if Vanessa was not there at her BFF's party. And I loved they already planned ahead in the dialogue. lol.   But watching the scene (and a bit of a rewind), it hit me. Wait is she...??? Ooo gurrrl. lol. 
    • I'm not at all surprised the 10 lowest-rated episodes are all from Season Seven. Moving The Golden Girls from 9 p.m. to 8 p.m. was foolish.
    • As the folklore goes, Love Boat episodes generally had one "heart" story, one "laughs" story, and one "tears" story. I guess Hotel just stuck with "heart" and "tears."
    • I thought food poisoning was an odd reason for Vanessa to miss the party.  That's why I appreciate reading everyone's comments and theories on this thread.  Oh!!  It hadn't occurred to me to speculate that she might be pregnant. I figured that she and Doug ate different things.  But pregnancy fits better.  I did think Shanice's dialogue delivery was slightly awkward (unusual for her)... but that would make sense if Shanice knew Vanessa had a pregnancy test but Vanessa said don't tell Doug.  I love all this theorizing/speculating, especially since we have no idea what will happen.
    • I want that as well, but given how much I've been playing catch-up during some personal/family drama, it's been background music with very little to hold my interest. Then I saw a spoiler and rolled my eyes.   Very. I guess JG is hitting another of his low points. 
    • Well...unexpected wiggle room is still wiggle room.   I went back and finally rewatched Friday's episode (along with Thursday's). And God, how those episodes flowed. It did help that Zimmerman did the breakdowns for both so the plot threads were cohesive. I do wonder if she did it today as well. Martin and Tate also of course did good scripts. And I might have to take back my earlier comment about the crowd. While it was not like Nicole's Award Event where I felt there were more extras (and was in the minority on that), I felt this one did not have enough (also in the minority). But on a rewatch, I did like that Production actually did a fairly decent job of covering it up so kudos.    I also wanted to take the moment to say the majority of the week before last (and this past week) were full of cliffhangers. Perhaps not what is used to, but they were there. And I loved that since the majority of said cliffhangers were connected to Silk Press Sheila, it gave an intensity and build to the last week leading to this superb episode that gave us not only an old school soap reveal (complete with moments to let the scenes breathe, but annoyed in how other scenes which were also good did not compare...another sign of knowing when a reveal is great) but, THREE cliffhangers!!! Well-done, Cliffhanger Friday!!!   Ms. Mann and Ms. Michelle were clearly the stars. I've said it once someone mentioned it and I'll say it again...Ambyr just gives so much SMG's version of Kendall on AMC in Eva, and I love that. And that reveal on Silk Press Sheila...WOW. Great to have confirmation that BILL was the lawyer. Even better to see Silk Press interacting with all of the Duprees and not being a bit scared. And yes, I caught that she was preggers at the same time as Nicole. I also caught in the Martin vs Ted scene when he was talking about the timeline was another clue...since we discussed the timeline during Kat's birthday party episodes and how odd it was that Silk Press Sheila would celebrate Eva's birthday if the weeks were off. UNLESS...they're not. I just feel they would not be mentioning it unless SilkPress has a 90s DAYS Sami Trump card incoming. And 90s DAYS Sami Brady ALWAYS had a trump card. So...looking forward to today. lol.    I'm also going to be in the minority about the next thought. I thought Maurice did a good job as Ted in the reveal scenes. Though I do agree that compared to everyone else...even his FOINE doctor friend...he was the weak leak. DD was giving and she was in the background reacting. The Avengers...I mean...the Duprees closing ranks...was great and also showed how in sync the actors were. Naomi being sure Chels was not filming THIS time was a hoot. And I lived for Kat's shade among the mess. I'm happy that we are here at this reveal with OriginalTed since the rumor (marking preemptions) we are a little under two weeks to go before he's out.   I liked the layers. One thing that I like about this show. We usually mention something here and then the show writers have it mentioned either in episode or immediately in the next. The SilkPress/Eva picture last week. Where is Naomi/Vanessa this week of episodes. And they got to it. Well-played. I also like the reveal that Martin knew SilkPress as a kid, calling back to that weird scene with the brownie. I mentioned the Bill-as-Lawyer scene, calling back to Bill/Vernon's first alone scene. The reveal of all of SilkPress's many names. The fact that Andre and Dani continue to grow closer and closer and had a near-miss...something this show knows how to do extremely well for me. Their near-misses built up the drama and story, and I see how much I'm invested when we have them. The whole Silk Press Sheila story being the best example.    I see from a few of the comments some of you all are already thinking about those consequences toward Bill that I was thinking about on Friday.

      Please register in order to view this content

           And while I did not like the Vanessa/Doug scenes at first view...though I love they followed up on her food poisoning phone call on Thursday...I liked it on second watch. Partly because it gave another hint that Doug has some idea of what Vanessa is doing...if not who.  Partly because I had assumed that Doug got poisoned, too. Seeing it was just Vanessa confused me since I thought they were out at dinner pre-party. That said...I go back to my original thought in that moment. Has Vanessa being having all this sex without protection and we are going to get a WTD with Doug, Diego, and whoever else she has been with? Uh oh?    And I continue to also love how flashbacks are used. Rare do they show a flashback to a prior episode unless it's important so those are well done. And then you have the flashbacks like the one with Bill/Dani that informs the audience. And I loved that green dress. But tbf, I loved the feistiness of her red dress. Andre was not alone in taking her in.    And someone mentioned it the other day and I wanted to echo it. One thing I like about this show that I don't see much in the other soaps to this degree has been that several of the characters have their own personal style for sure, but the men's style really have stood out for me since its started. Ted being a clear example with his turtlenecks and general...for lack of better word at the moment manly...to him. I like that about the men where other men styles on other soaps just blend together.    Looking forward to Kat v Eva, Anita vs Silk Press Sheila, and Nicole vs Ted today.    Did I mention I was happy Clifton was back?  
    • I’ll take a pass on the lecture, because you've overestimated my concern with your feedback, but thanks for the enthusiasm. Your claims of not wanting to get into an argument over every post are unfortunately voided by your impulsive need to add into discussions that are none of your concern.  
    • I guess it's because the stories on "Hotel" tended to be very...melodramatic, lol?  I mean, it seems like every episode had long-lost lovers reuniting or people finding out someone they knew and/or loved was dying.  And then there was the time Anne Baxter was strung out on dope, lol. Brandon Stoddard must've envied what the other Brandon (Tartikoff) was doing at NBC.
    • Given some of the things that have been said I am going to quote the preface to an analysis I researched & posted about the desired demos when JFP was EP of AW. And, that is more than enough about that, from me.  
    • The thing that I am stuck on is that the in studio scenes in Egypt started airing in mid-October. It seems very strange that they would have planned to have a couple of weeks of studio scenes airing before they started showing location footage. Normally even though some scenes in a remote-infused storyline are in studio, they would start airing a mixture of studio and location footage at the same time. I suspect they had put Arizona in their back pocket well before the Achille Lauro (hence Hawk arriving in September) and possibly moved up the Egypt in-studio action so that the remote Arizona piece unfolded during November. The Achille Lauro may have been the final straw but I would bet it was not the first time they considered the risk. I have found one somewhat contemporaneous reference published on October 19th but pinned to an October 7th* "diary entry" mentioning that the location shoot in Egypt had been changed to Arizona. "International terrorism has its effect on daytime drama, too. Another World producers had scheduled an elaborate and expensive location shoot in Egypt this fall, But with the serious military attacks and hijackings going on, they decided to play it safe. They are going to Arizona instead. The cast members involved were disappointed but understood the decision." *Undated, but specified as the Monday before Melody Thomas's wedding to Ed Scott. But of course it's possible that the first draft referred to Egypt and was revised after October 7th to mention the cancellation before it went to press. But even making the decision the week of October 7th seems tight to get the Egypt scenes to air on the 17th/18th. I would love to find something from a daily news cycle that would be clearer about the dates.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy