Jump to content

Harding Lemay's soap Lovers and Friends


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I never got to see Lovers & Friends or For Richer, For Poorer - only read synopsis in Soap Opera Digest.

for the person who asked, SOD started in 1975.

The biggest thing that hurt L&F and FR,FP is that for some weird reason many NBC affiliates did not pick it up. Our affiliate out of Nashville never aired either program - thus the reason I never saw them. We watched all the NBC soaps in the 70's and anything related to Another World was seen in our household. We saw every episode of Somerset ever made. I just wish my memory was better to remember all of it. Since the 3 strokes I had last year I lost a lot of my memories of things or they get jumbled from time to time.

**************************************

As to Harding Lemay, the biggest reason that Lemay didn't succeed as much in later stints, I have always theorized was due to the soap opera writing format changing in the 80's.

In the 70's when Lemay wrote AW, he had a staff but they didn't really have a lot to do. Tom King once made the statement as I said that Harding did the HW job, did the breakdowns, and even wrote his own scripts or assisted them in writing them. before he left AW in May 1979, he wrote all of the scripts. That was from Mar 5, 1979 to May 11, 1979 he wrote every single script. and those were 90 minute shows.

He was more hands on in what he did and things really changed in the 80's as the staffs started getting bigger and all. I personally think the way they did things in the 60's & 70's was better. The less people involved seemed to keep the stories concise and all.

Many times the staff writers only had the job of looking over the script for errors and continuity issues.

I don't think Lemay could write at all in the current format. It has changed even more than it was in the 80's and the writing staffs have gotten even bigger.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Well one thing I've always loved about the NEw York based soaps in general is how much Broadway talent they use--but yes Rauch and Lemayparticularly took advantage of this. As for Lemay's credentials though, he was primarily a playwright but accomplished? Not to sound snotty but that's overstating things--he never had any plays run on Broadway or in London's West End for example. THere are a good ten or so, some with descriptions, available for amateur groups to perform listed here: http://www.doollee.com/PlaywrightsL/LemayHarding.htm and otherwise I've never found much else. None seem to have been published...

He was picked by P&G for AW because of his excellent autobiography Outside Looking In from 1970 I think, which did win awards and I think made P&G think of a soap opera

Steve--I agree with you about the older style of writing soaps. I'd still love to see some eps of Lovers and Friends though...

  • Members
Posted

He didn't come to AW from theatre. He was a very successful editor at Alfred Knopf. And yes, his memoir got him the job.

Don't criticise Lemay. When you write something the way Lemay wrote AW, then you can. Until that very moment... I seriously do not understand your so evident hate of this man and the constant mentioning of his consulting stint at OLTL.

  • Members
Posted

What? I think AW under him from all Iv'e seen and read would prob be my ideal soap. I'm gagging to see ANYTHING from Lovers and Friends. The man is *great* I just think he sorta burned out on the world of soaps. I'd prob rank him right under AGnes Nixon as best soap writers. Where did I say I hated him?

I just wouldn't ever bother hiring the man to consult for a soap ;)

(And I always found it odd that people always went on about him being a playwright yet I'd never heard of performances of any of his plays. )

  • Members
Posted

You didn't say you hated him, you just mentioned the consulting stints in unflattering terms so many times that I got the impression you despised him.

And he is a playwright, it's only that his plays aren't all that popular. As I said, he was an editor even before he became a true, performed playwright.

That's true. There is no use in him consulting.

  • Members
Posted

I sorta wonder about the whole consulting position anyway--as he himself said often he was completely ignored. So why bother?

ANyway I'mglad it's been cleared up that I don't hate him :P

  • Members
Posted

Going back to this--how big were the staffs on average? I was just watching on youtube an AMC ep from 1978 that was repeated on SoapNet (Tom and Erica's wedding) which was fairly soon after they went to an hour I guess--and was surprised that the writing team seemed larger than I expected.

The credits arein this clip and there are 8 writers listed--the only one I recognize being Wisner Washam (Agnes Nixon's name isn't on the writing credits but I'm sure she still oversaw things--)

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

  • Members
Posted

Here is a for instance from AW:

1965 to 1968 there were only 4 writers on staff

1969 to 1971 they went to 5

At various times through the 70's they got up to 6 or 7, but 1980 they only had 6 again - including headwriters on all of these.

**********************************

Texas usually had 5 to 7 on staff from 1980 to 1982 including the headwriters

*******************************

In 1977 Days only had 7 including the headwriter.

In 1976 the first year they were an hour for the whole year they only had 3 writers and William J. Bell was working on both Y&R and Days. The staff included Bell, Pat Falken Smith and Margaret Stewart that year. I had thought Sherri Anderson was still on staff that year, but maybe it was just the first part of the year. Days had 6 in 1975 to 1976.

******************************

Y&R only had 2 on staff from 1975 to 1976 but it was only 30 minutes - they were Bell and kay Alden.

  • Members
Posted

Here's a list of SW changes during Harding's tenure of AW:

Harding "Pete" Lemay, August 1971 - May 1979

  • In 1971, with Robert Cenedella, Kathy Callaway, Theodore Apstein, and Robert Newman
  • In 1972, with Kathy Callaway, Theodore Apstein, Robert Newman, Robert Cenedella, and Stan Silverman
  • In 1973, with Theodore Apstein, Robert Newman, Rodney Anderson, Tom King, Jan Merlin
  • In 1974, with Rodney Anderson, Tom King, Charles Kozloff, Jan Merlin, Douglas Marland, Mel Brez, Ethel Brez, Bibi Wein
  • In 1975, with Tom King, Jan Merlin, Bibi Wein
  • In 1976, with Tom King (Monday), Peter Swet (Tuesday), Jan Merlin (Wednesday), Barry Berg (Thursday), Arthur Giron (Friday), Kathy Callaway, Douglas Marland, Kevin McDonnell. Swet, Berg, and Giron were also playwrights

(Note: Lemay's last script was Friday, May 11, 1979)
  • Members
Posted

Thanks to both of you. I have no doubt AMC's staff went up quite a bit when it went to an hour--in the 1976 book ALl Her CHildren Agnes still soudns VERY reluctant to expand. I've watched a number of Y&R eps which just list Bell and Alden (when B&B started how many were on staff?)

SO on AW for a while different writers took each day each week? Interesting. One reason I always thought maybe Lemay was starting to burn out was his reaction to Lovers and Friends and having Tom King take over the revamp--for a show he created he didn't seem to really fight for it (I know this is unfair of me to say I'm just going by his brief bit about it in his book)--often times you think that a soap writer is gagging for the chance to created HIS own show and would lose interest in his previous show--but maybe that's to Lemay's credit.

It's funny the number of writers and how it increased. THat great 1984 episode of Loving has the following writers (keep in mind it was a 30 minute show and had nearly as many as the hour AMC in 1978)

Douglas Marland

Nancy Franklin

Percy Granger

Kathleen Lawlor

William Levinson.

Recently I found my video tapes of the last four months of The City, and one of the episodes from the final week had these credits for writers--again this was a 30 minute show (seperated into these three groups):

James Harmon Brown

Barbara Esensten

Ron Renaud

Juliet Law Packer (who apparantly was a writer on the Waltons back in the 70s..)

Rick DiGregorio

Tony Lang

Tita Bell (who was a Happy Day actress who recently did the scenario for the Russian telenovela Bednaya Nastya which was a huge success and Paul Rauch was involved in 2003)

Lynn Martin

Randy Holland

Kirk Aames

Royal Miller

Story Consultant Agnes Nixon.

12 people! I really loved the City in its final months especially (glares at Sylph) but I just don't even know what all those people did on it.

  • Members
Posted

Back in the 60's and 70's the writing on shows was done very differently than it is today. The headwriter was basically a contractor who was given an annual fee by TPTB and he/she then hired their own staff of sub-writers. Back then it was the HW who did the longterm story, the weekly and daily breakdowns, and then editing, and many of the HW's wrote scripts too. Therefore it was in a HW's best financial interest to keep as small staff of writers.

We can thank the WGA for the current setup of bloated writing staffs. During contract negotiations in the 80's the union fought for and eventually won the elimination of the old system and got the higher salaries and recognition for staff writers as well as individual titles and job descriptions for each rung on the writing staff. Lemay in an interview years back in one of the rags blamed that development for the decline in quality of the programs, as it effectively shifted the medium from being one consisting of strong HW's to one where the EP's now held all the power.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy