Jump to content

Harding Lemay's soap Lovers and Friends


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I never got to see Lovers & Friends or For Richer, For Poorer - only read synopsis in Soap Opera Digest.

for the person who asked, SOD started in 1975.

The biggest thing that hurt L&F and FR,FP is that for some weird reason many NBC affiliates did not pick it up. Our affiliate out of Nashville never aired either program - thus the reason I never saw them. We watched all the NBC soaps in the 70's and anything related to Another World was seen in our household. We saw every episode of Somerset ever made. I just wish my memory was better to remember all of it. Since the 3 strokes I had last year I lost a lot of my memories of things or they get jumbled from time to time.

**************************************

As to Harding Lemay, the biggest reason that Lemay didn't succeed as much in later stints, I have always theorized was due to the soap opera writing format changing in the 80's.

In the 70's when Lemay wrote AW, he had a staff but they didn't really have a lot to do. Tom King once made the statement as I said that Harding did the HW job, did the breakdowns, and even wrote his own scripts or assisted them in writing them. before he left AW in May 1979, he wrote all of the scripts. That was from Mar 5, 1979 to May 11, 1979 he wrote every single script. and those were 90 minute shows.

He was more hands on in what he did and things really changed in the 80's as the staffs started getting bigger and all. I personally think the way they did things in the 60's & 70's was better. The less people involved seemed to keep the stories concise and all.

Many times the staff writers only had the job of looking over the script for errors and continuity issues.

I don't think Lemay could write at all in the current format. It has changed even more than it was in the 80's and the writing staffs have gotten even bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well one thing I've always loved about the NEw York based soaps in general is how much Broadway talent they use--but yes Rauch and Lemayparticularly took advantage of this. As for Lemay's credentials though, he was primarily a playwright but accomplished? Not to sound snotty but that's overstating things--he never had any plays run on Broadway or in London's West End for example. THere are a good ten or so, some with descriptions, available for amateur groups to perform listed here: http://www.doollee.com/PlaywrightsL/LemayHarding.htm and otherwise I've never found much else. None seem to have been published...

He was picked by P&G for AW because of his excellent autobiography Outside Looking In from 1970 I think, which did win awards and I think made P&G think of a soap opera

Steve--I agree with you about the older style of writing soaps. I'd still love to see some eps of Lovers and Friends though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He didn't come to AW from theatre. He was a very successful editor at Alfred Knopf. And yes, his memoir got him the job.

Don't criticise Lemay. When you write something the way Lemay wrote AW, then you can. Until that very moment... I seriously do not understand your so evident hate of this man and the constant mentioning of his consulting stint at OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What? I think AW under him from all Iv'e seen and read would prob be my ideal soap. I'm gagging to see ANYTHING from Lovers and Friends. The man is *great* I just think he sorta burned out on the world of soaps. I'd prob rank him right under AGnes Nixon as best soap writers. Where did I say I hated him?

I just wouldn't ever bother hiring the man to consult for a soap ;)

(And I always found it odd that people always went on about him being a playwright yet I'd never heard of performances of any of his plays. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You didn't say you hated him, you just mentioned the consulting stints in unflattering terms so many times that I got the impression you despised him.

And he is a playwright, it's only that his plays aren't all that popular. As I said, he was an editor even before he became a true, performed playwright.

That's true. There is no use in him consulting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Going back to this--how big were the staffs on average? I was just watching on youtube an AMC ep from 1978 that was repeated on SoapNet (Tom and Erica's wedding) which was fairly soon after they went to an hour I guess--and was surprised that the writing team seemed larger than I expected.

The credits arein this clip and there are 8 writers listed--the only one I recognize being Wisner Washam (Agnes Nixon's name isn't on the writing credits but I'm sure she still oversaw things--)

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here is a for instance from AW:

1965 to 1968 there were only 4 writers on staff

1969 to 1971 they went to 5

At various times through the 70's they got up to 6 or 7, but 1980 they only had 6 again - including headwriters on all of these.

**********************************

Texas usually had 5 to 7 on staff from 1980 to 1982 including the headwriters

*******************************

In 1977 Days only had 7 including the headwriter.

In 1976 the first year they were an hour for the whole year they only had 3 writers and William J. Bell was working on both Y&R and Days. The staff included Bell, Pat Falken Smith and Margaret Stewart that year. I had thought Sherri Anderson was still on staff that year, but maybe it was just the first part of the year. Days had 6 in 1975 to 1976.

******************************

Y&R only had 2 on staff from 1975 to 1976 but it was only 30 minutes - they were Bell and kay Alden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's a list of SW changes during Harding's tenure of AW:

Harding "Pete" Lemay, August 1971 - May 1979

  • In 1971, with Robert Cenedella, Kathy Callaway, Theodore Apstein, and Robert Newman
  • In 1972, with Kathy Callaway, Theodore Apstein, Robert Newman, Robert Cenedella, and Stan Silverman
  • In 1973, with Theodore Apstein, Robert Newman, Rodney Anderson, Tom King, Jan Merlin
  • In 1974, with Rodney Anderson, Tom King, Charles Kozloff, Jan Merlin, Douglas Marland, Mel Brez, Ethel Brez, Bibi Wein
  • In 1975, with Tom King, Jan Merlin, Bibi Wein
  • In 1976, with Tom King (Monday), Peter Swet (Tuesday), Jan Merlin (Wednesday), Barry Berg (Thursday), Arthur Giron (Friday), Kathy Callaway, Douglas Marland, Kevin McDonnell. Swet, Berg, and Giron were also playwrights

(Note: Lemay's last script was Friday, May 11, 1979)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks to both of you. I have no doubt AMC's staff went up quite a bit when it went to an hour--in the 1976 book ALl Her CHildren Agnes still soudns VERY reluctant to expand. I've watched a number of Y&R eps which just list Bell and Alden (when B&B started how many were on staff?)

SO on AW for a while different writers took each day each week? Interesting. One reason I always thought maybe Lemay was starting to burn out was his reaction to Lovers and Friends and having Tom King take over the revamp--for a show he created he didn't seem to really fight for it (I know this is unfair of me to say I'm just going by his brief bit about it in his book)--often times you think that a soap writer is gagging for the chance to created HIS own show and would lose interest in his previous show--but maybe that's to Lemay's credit.

It's funny the number of writers and how it increased. THat great 1984 episode of Loving has the following writers (keep in mind it was a 30 minute show and had nearly as many as the hour AMC in 1978)

Douglas Marland

Nancy Franklin

Percy Granger

Kathleen Lawlor

William Levinson.

Recently I found my video tapes of the last four months of The City, and one of the episodes from the final week had these credits for writers--again this was a 30 minute show (seperated into these three groups):

James Harmon Brown

Barbara Esensten

Ron Renaud

Juliet Law Packer (who apparantly was a writer on the Waltons back in the 70s..)

Rick DiGregorio

Tony Lang

Tita Bell (who was a Happy Day actress who recently did the scenario for the Russian telenovela Bednaya Nastya which was a huge success and Paul Rauch was involved in 2003)

Lynn Martin

Randy Holland

Kirk Aames

Royal Miller

Story Consultant Agnes Nixon.

12 people! I really loved the City in its final months especially (glares at Sylph) but I just don't even know what all those people did on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Back in the 60's and 70's the writing on shows was done very differently than it is today. The headwriter was basically a contractor who was given an annual fee by TPTB and he/she then hired their own staff of sub-writers. Back then it was the HW who did the longterm story, the weekly and daily breakdowns, and then editing, and many of the HW's wrote scripts too. Therefore it was in a HW's best financial interest to keep as small staff of writers.

We can thank the WGA for the current setup of bloated writing staffs. During contract negotiations in the 80's the union fought for and eventually won the elimination of the old system and got the higher salaries and recognition for staff writers as well as individual titles and job descriptions for each rung on the writing staff. Lemay in an interview years back in one of the rags blamed that development for the decline in quality of the programs, as it effectively shifted the medium from being one consisting of strong HW's to one where the EP's now held all the power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So I think I figured based on the end credits who is the script writer for each episode. Thursday's episode looked to have been script written by David Kreizman, and it was a well written episode that flowed well. Today's episode looked to have been script written by Henry Newman (son of Fran Myers and the late Roger Newman).   Right now, I've noticed improvements on the day to day scripts and that's a good sign that eventually the long term outlines that we will see in the coming weeks and months will be good.  Fingers crossed.
    • I have a very different view of Dano. For one thing, she like me, loves her little dogs. Another thing, of course she is effusive, outgoing but she is also very vulnerable & she used to have her Frank, her mother & Vivian who officially was her publicist (I think) but she was so much more. Now, they are all gone. Well, except for her always having a pair of her little dogs. But, if I were going to think in your terms, what I would think is "cool aunt". Because this lady is really one cool dame. Here is one of my favorite views of her https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGecq8rJS4w/
    • NBC Press Photo, text, from Jason47's files on daytimeroyalty

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy