Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

IMDb has Joel Bailey's last airdate in August, 1985. Gina Gallego didn't join the show until after "Rituals" last aired in September, 1985. I think Gallego and Bailey may have been in episodes of "Flamingo Road" together, but I don't think they were ever in the same scene. 

I know it probably would have been a very bleak story, but I know NBC wanted "Santa Barbara" to do an AIDS plot. I would have had Lindsay Smith diagnosed with the disease and come to stay with the Capwells while he was living out his final days. I'm thinking a sort of "In the Gloaming" style story. Sophia would have liked to get to know the boy she raised as her own despite Minx 's deception and Lindsay would have given her insight into a part of her son she never knew. I think it would have also been a painful reminder that C.C.'s vision of Channing, Jr., was not the reality. In the aftermath, maybe even have Sophia become involved with an AIDS charity with possibly Sophia's involvement infuriating C.C. over Sophia wanting to share her connection to the disease through Lindsay which would make very public Lindsay and Channing, Jr.'s relationship. Maybe have Mason handle the legal end of the charity work with Mason siding with Sophia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The end of episode 98 and the beginning of episode 99 have a classic soap opera production/continuity error. 98 ends with Peter in a hospital bed. 99 begins with Peter in the same bed, repeating the same scene, only this time sporting a new haircut and a shave. 

Edited by Jdee43
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would have been odd because as I recall the reveal, CC got angry at Mason for outing Channing.  Correct me if I am wrong, but I think he yelled at Mason for thinking that he was humiliating Channing, but he affirmed that nothing could destroy the love that he felt for his son.  It was one of the few times that I enjoyed that version of CC because his response was so unexpected. 

I get that all social issues stories on soaps need an antagonist to portray the social implications of the cause.  However, it would've been unfair to CC to make him be the face of the bias toward the disease.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If I remember right, that was where both he and the confrontation with Mason ended up, but for him to get there, Sophia had to talk him out of his initially more homophobic reaction. I think he was on the verge of having Channing's belongings burned in disgust and she talked him out of it.

Edited by Ryan Mason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

C.C. always came across as a character who needed to control everything. I felt that the AIDS story could be used to dig at what should have been a much more deeper issue in the relationship between C.C. and Sophia than what it was: C.C.'s golden child was in fact Lionel's. The entire opening storyline deals with the deep pain that C.C. feels over the loss of Channing and how he, in the aftermath, controlled the life of Brandon, Channing's son. I don't get the sense that this was an ever present issue in C.C. and Sophia's relationship. 

Ultimately, I see the situation with Lindsay coming to stay with the Capwells and the aftermath as a chance to dig into the deep fissure that should have existed between C.C. and Sophia. C.C.'s reaction would be at face value homophobia, which was and still is deeply ingrained in society, but more about the fact that Channing wasn't C.C.'s child and Sophia openly deceived C.C. I would have had a nosey reporter (possibly working for Warren and dating Ted) wondering why Lindsay has come to stay with the Capwells and start digging around only to discover not only the connection to Channing, but also Sophia's role in Channing's murder and possibily Brandon's paternity. 

I don't think that Sophia's role as murderess was made public was it? Or that Channing was Brandon's father? People knew, but it wasn't like it was well known in Santa Barbara. Then again, with Brandon's custody, I imagine that the paternity became public, but maybe I am wrong.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sophia was still in her drag king era, and hadn't emerged when Mason outed Channing.

It's an excellent point because I don't even think that an issue was made of Sophia's return, in terms of publicity.  She was a society matron, and later we know she was a well regarded actress, but her return from the dead got no publicity as far as I recall.

Well, certainly by the time of Brandon's kidnapping, it was public knowledge that he wasn't Gina's biological son.  But, I still think his paternity was not common knowledge outside the family.  In fact, I'm willing to bet that Ted never knew that Channing was Brandon's father.  But, then again, Ted didn't know a lot of things about his family.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This made me laugh because the writers never knew what to do with Ted. Todd McKee was so attractive and charismatic, but pretty much an afterthought in terms of storylines. 

Re: social issues. I don't remember SB doing social issue stories. Perhaps, they did a few and I'm just not remembering them. My first thought was Eden's rape with the PSAs, but that was muddied by the identity of the rapist as that scared some female viewers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did remember for sure that it was the summer of 1985, so she was long past that period. I looked it up here and it was episode 276 on August 26th that I'm thinking of:

http://santabarbara-online.com/Calendar1985.htm

276
Mason tells CC Channing was gay & Santana confirms it, Lionel sends CC Sophia's old audition tape, Gina learns from Augusta that Channing is Lionel's son, Steve & Mary look for Christie, Sophia convinces CC it doesn't matter if Channing was gay, Frank reads Lionel's eulogy, Christie warns Ted her rapist may be after him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I went back and watched the episode, and you are correct @Ryan Mason, thanks for the information.  It was so interesting to recall that Santana knew about Channing.  Yet, Mason's incriminating Polaroid was very tame in retrospect (Channing just has his arm around Lindsay).  And the way in which they dance around the topic is almost comical. (e.g. CC: but he fathered a child? Mason: He was homosexual, not impotent.)

It is a reminder that we live in amazing times when we can immediately watch so much content, any time we please.

And, boy, they burned through a lot of stories in those first few years. My bias has always been that SB didn't start in earnest until Jed Allen took over as CC, but in hindsight, it is hard to believe that happened 2 1/2 years into the run of the show.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're welcome! And what was interesting for me too is that I just vaguely remembered that it was sometime in the summer of 1985 because that's when I started saving episodes on tape (we didn't even get a VCR until March 1985 so most of that first year was lost to me as soon as I went back to school) and I knew I'd seen it, but until I saw the summaries laid out like that, I'd forgotten that it was the one-two-three punch all within the span of a few days of finding out that Channing was gay AND Lionel's son and then finally Gina yanking the revised will and divorce papers away from him that he was desperately trying to sign that made his aneurysm burst and caused the long coma that Jed Allan woke up from in January!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The criticism that sticks out like a sore thumb on re-watch is how poor the writing was at differentiating the voices of the characters.  Sophia, Santana, and Gina's dialogue is all interchangeable.  You get no sense of the fact that these women are different ages, different classes, or different ethnicities. 

Sophia gets in some great zingers toward Mason when insulting him for sleeping with Gina.  But, all three women use the same vocabulary, they all have the same attitude, and they all play the scene with the same amount of heightened emotion. 

Augusta is a unique character, and yet so much of that relies on Louise Sorrel's tremendous charisma, the costuming, and the fact that she had Nicholas Coster as a scene partner.

Which is probably why the rest of them were re-castible, but there was only one Augusta and Lionel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm up to episode 100. At the moment, it seems like Nicholas Coster is now the star of the show. He's in every storyline, appearing everyday. Joe is an afterthought; he hasn't been on in 14 shows, almost 3 weeks. 

Episode 100 features another pretty blonde in a skimpy bikini. It also features location footage with Lionel on his boat and then in the water, diving with the blonde. The episode gives Nicholas Coster an additional credit as "underwater consultant." Was that one of his hobbys? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy