Jump to content

AMC: MMT has some nerve


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd agree that Megan was good at first, but she had a lot more to work with. Her big storylines of 2003 (Bianca's rape, Michael's murder and the Greenlee/Jack reveal), for example, were just built off of storylines that were already there. That's Megan's style, though (usually), she can be really good and hit the ground running, but then not only does she run out of steam, she loses her god d@mn marbles and starts writing destructive storylines.

McTavish did inherit a lot of positive aspects. I'd argue that when Anna Cascio joined Gordon Rayfield, the show went on an immediate upswing and the show was getting better by the day by the time their work stopped airing. The BAD aspects of the show at that time were things could be easily swept away. For example, when McTavish took over, she got rid of the newbies, and ended a lot of storylines that weren't working, very easily. By the time McTavish left, her "stamp" she had put on the show could never be undone, her damage has lasting ramifications that the show to this day suffers from.

B&E's tenure right now? Much ado about nothing. It's boring and forgettable as others have said, but destructive, oh they don't even holding a freak candle to McTavish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy