This is the Presidential Campaign Thread.

Barack Obama Vs. John McCain.

Edited November 6, 200817 yr by Toups

Do you honestly think the SD's aren't going to vote for the person who is leading in overall delegates?

They should vote for the one who is winning in battleground states and beating McCain by more...that is Hillary Clinton.

They should vote for the one who is leading IN ALL THE CATEGORIES........

And that is Barack Obama.

Your math KILLS me. If she were leading, I wonder would you still be pushing this same horseshit.

Do you honestly think the SD's aren't going to vote for the person who is leading in overall delegates?

Let the SDs overturn the will of the voters who gace Obama this lead.....

And JM is your next president.

You know you two...quit coming down on me right now because I want to celebrate this victory of Hillary's and all I get is negativity, as usual.

That is the real horseshit here. Knock it off

They should vote for the one who is leading IN ALL THE CATEGORIES........

And who is winning by more in the category of being more formidable against McCain? Not Obama. She is beating him by more...that is what counts, along with pledged and SD votes. That should be enough to put her on top.

They should vote for the one who is winning in battleground states and beating McCain by more...that is Hillary Clinton.

Devoted, your devotion to hillary is amazing and you definantly have the right username.

I am devoted to a lot of things and that includes Hillary and AMC....and Erica Kane

You know you two...quit coming down on me right now because I want to celebrate this victory of Hillary's and all I get is negativity, as usual.

That is the real horseshit here. Knock it off

You know something?

When she lost last week, I would have expected you to be here showing respect for BO. Instead, you were nowhere to be found.

And......YOU were the one who came in here trying to rub in some meaningless victory. NOW you want us to knock it off?!

I and Erica are right here. Like we should be.

And to celebrate doesn't mean coming in here and ONCE AGAIN telling us that BO should NOT, does not deserve or isn't qulified to get the nom., lead the Party and win the election.

You want respect for your views but every time someone tells you something you don't want to hear you start telling us to knock it off. Why don't you listen to us for a change?! No one is telling you to agree, but damn.

Devoted, your devotion to hillary is amazing and you definantly have the right username.

Just like Roman is to Obama. He posts and posts and posts and posts and posts here for him. We get the message. He is a BIG Obama supporter.

Edited May 14, 200817 yr by Soapsuds

And who is winning by more in the category of being more formidable against McCain? Not Obama. She is beating him by more...that is what counts, along with pledged and SD votes. That should be enough to put her on top.

So you honestly want the party to give her the nom, with these BS numbers you keep finding.

Fine.

Then Obama should NOT be on the ticket with her.

Let's go that route, ok?

Just like Roman is to Obama. He posts and posts and posts and posts and posts here for him. We get the message. He is a BIG Obama supporter.

Do you have a problem with that?

And who is winning by more in the category of being more formidable against McCain? Not Obama. She is beating him by more...that is what counts, along with pledged and SD votes. That should be enough to put her on top.

I understand what you are saying, but if the SD's voted by that logic they will anger alot of people, not only is obama leading in overall delegates he is leading in the popular vote. I don't think they would risk having people sit out this voting season or worst vote for McCain because they wouldn't give the nom to obama. I think there will be more of an outcry for injustince if they don't give it to the person that is leading overall then 1/3 of hillary supporters sitting out this race or voting for McCain if obama is the nom.

You know something?

When she lost last week, I would have expected you to be here showing respect for BO. Instead, you were nowhere to be found.

And......YOU were the one who came in here trying to rub in some meaningless victory. NOW you want us to knock it off?!

I and Erica are right here. Like we should be.

And to celebrate doesn't mean coming in here and ONCE AGAIN telling us that BO should NOT, does not deserve or isn't qulified to get the nom., lead the Party and win the election.

You want respect for your views but every time someone tells you something you don't want to hear you start telling us to knock it off. Why don't you listen to us for a change?! No one is telling you to agree, but damn.

Where have I heard this all before? Oh yeah in the Days thread...and ever other thread posters dont agree with you.

You know something?

When she lost last week, I would have expected you to be here showing respect for BO. Instead, you were nowhere to be found.

And......YOU were the one who came in here trying to rub in some meaningless victory. NOW you want us to knock it off?!

I and Erica are right here. Like we should be.

And to celebrate doesn't mean coming in here and ONCE AGAIN telling us that BO should NOT, does not deserve or isn't qulified to get the nom., lead the Party and win the election.

You want respect for your views but every time someone tells you something you don't want to hear you start telling us to knock it off. Why don't you listen to us for a change?! No one is telling you to agree, but damn.

And who says I have to be here every time she loses and he wins? I am not obligated to be here but I post here because I like this place.

Oh so now her victories are meaningless whereas his mean something? She is winning the big states-that is what is meaningful...along with swing states that are heavily in our favor.

And yes I want it to knock off because I see certain posters in this thread raining in on a parade when we want to celebrate Hillary's victories. Obviously, more are happy with Obama victories...we don't rain in on that parade...in fact, I like it that he wins as well because I am also his supporter.

I never said you and EK70 should not be here but I just want the negativity over a celebration to stop...it has happened too much. It goes both ways...you have people saying Obama should not get the nomination and that Hillary should not get it either. I say one of them gets it and puts the other on as VP because a lot of supporters will go to McCain if their candidate is not on the ticket. That is a fact. You are also putting words into my mouth by saying I said Obama is not qualified..I have said here before he is, much more than McCain. That is where I said Hillary was wrong to say McCain is more qualified. I think the one who deserves the nomination is the one who is the most formidable and has the most delegates in super and pledged. You have to face facts that it might not be your candidate.

This is the FIRST TIME I have said to knock it off and, with the way things are going, it will probably not be the last. I have listened to the negativity for too long.

I understand what you are saying, but if the SD's voted by that logic they will anger alot of people, not only is obama leading in overall delegates he is leading in the popular vote. I don't think they would risk having people sit out this voting season or worst vote for McCain because they wouldn't give the nom to obama. I think there will be more of an outcry for injustince if they don't give it to the person that is leading overall then 1/3 of hillary supporters sitting out this race or voting for McCain if obama is the nom.

I am sure people would understand why SDs would go for Hillary if she is more formidable and why the SDs feel she should be at the top of the ticket and still vote....especially if she puts him on as VP. Remember that a lot of Obama supporters will go for McCain if he is not on the ticket. I think they need each other...they admire each other, like each other as friends, and odds are have a deal worked out.