Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Although there are people walking around that think this way, I don't think they represent the core. The internet is definitely home to what may seem like a lot of people with extreme views and one of the reasons they love the internet is because they would have a difficult time pushing their views among the general population.

Whether or not people feel that the media is being unfair or too easy on Palin, the fact remains that Americans on whole still don't know very much about her period. Keeping her from interviews for this long only gives people about six weeks to make up their minds about her. All those people who insist that knowing your candidate is important aren't going to get to know enough.

Joe Biden saying he wasn't the best choice doesn't mean a whole lot. It merely demonstrates humility on his part and nothing more. Whether or not people agree with or even like Joe Biden, I don't think there is a whole lot of debate going on about his ability to step in and run the country. If that were at issue then Obama's judgment would have been questioned on that already. The only question about his selection of Joe Biden has been a political one as in his not picking the right candidate to win the election......and if anyone believes that then the fact that Obama chose his vp based on who would do the job well vs. who might get him more votes, puts to rest McCain's notion that Obama puts his ambition before what's best for the country. In fact, McCain should look at himself when he utters those words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

McCain is on The View this morning.

Barbara Walters gave him some tough questions about "What is Sarah Palin going to reform in Washington? Republicans have been in power for 8 years". He couldn't answer that.

Joy asked him why he is more in lock step with the Repubs than the used to be. And also called him out on how he can approve the "lipstick" and sex ed ad, when they are false. Babs then called him out on his previous use of the "lipstick" remark.

So far they haven't been giving him a free ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

National Polls

RCP* Average 09/05 - 09/11 -- 47.7 44.9 McCain +2.8

Rasmussen Tracking 09/09 - 09/11 3000 LV 48 45 McCain +3

Gallup Tracking 09/08 - 09/10 2718 RV 48 44 McCain +4

Hotline/FD Tracking 09/08 - 09/10 902 RV 46 44 McCain +2

FOX News 09/08 - 09/09 900 RV 45 42 McCain +3

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 09/06 - 09/08 860 RV 45 46 Obama +1

ABC News/Wash Post 09/05 - 09/07 LV 49 47 McCain +2

USA Today/Gallup 09/05 - 09/07 823 LV 54 44 McCain +10

CBS News 09/05 - 09/07 655 RV 46 44 McCain +2

CNN/OpinionResearch 09/05 - 09/07 942 RV 48 48 Tie

*realclearpolitics.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This soap is better than ANY show on television.

Election 2008, weekdays on EVERY DAMN NEWS CHANNEL

Starring: Barrack "Is He or Isn't He A Sexist, woman hating exotic Muslim" Obama, Joe "I plagiarized" Biden, John "I'm A Maverick with temper issues" McCain and Sarah "The Barracuda" Palin.

Featuring appearances from: The Democrat and Republican officials, the cooky, biased, sexist, left-wing agenda "American" (do they really love this county?) Media, the un-biased, never do anything wrong, only speak the "truth" right-wing American (because wearing a flagpin says you're patriotic) media. Oh, and who can forget the crazy assed bloggers who spit hatred on both sides, those in the media who are unbiased yet get criticized for doing their job (i.e. vetting candidates Obama and Palin).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My Lord. This is despicable. Talk about adding insult to injury. And I refuse to believe everyone getting foreclosed on had a sub-prime loan. Let's not forget that unemployment is pretty frickin' high right now. Man, the GOP really wants to keep the poor every-man/woman from voting. They don't even trust the American people to choose the next President-- or they wouldn't be doing all of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

State Polls

Friday, September 12

Race Poll Results Spread

Washington Rasmussen Obama 49, McCain 47 Obama +2

Ohio Univ. of Cinci McCain 48, Obama 44 McCain +4

Thursday, September 11

Race Poll Results Spread

Ohio InAdv/PollPosition McCain 48, Obama 47 McCain +1

Florida InAdv/PollPosition McCain 50, Obama 42 McCain +8

Michigan InAdv/PollPosition Obama 44, McCain 45 McCain +1

Michigan Rasmussen Obama 51, McCain 46 Obama +5

Colorado InAdv/PollPosition Obama 49, McCain 46 Obama +3

Georgia InAdv/PollPosition McCain 56, Obama 38 McCain +18

Nevada InAdv/PollPosition McCain 46, Obama 45 McCain +1

Wyoming Rasmussen McCain 58, Obama 39 McCain +19

Alaska Rasmussen McCain 64, Obama 33 McCain +31

Idaho Rasmussen McCain 68, Obama 29 McCain +39

North Carolina Research 2000 McCain 55, Obama 38 McCain +17

New Mexico Rasmussen Obama 47, McCain 49 McCain +2

Maine Research 2000 Obama 52, McCain 38 Obama +14

Mississippi Research 2000 McCain 55, Obama 37 McCain +18

Ohio Strategic Vision ® McCain 48, Obama 44 McCain +4

Michigan CNN/Time Obama 49, McCain 45 Obama +4

Virginia CNN/Time McCain 50, Obama 46 McCain +4

Colorado PPP (D) Obama 47, McCain 46 Obama +1

Missouri CNN/Time McCain 50, Obama 45 McCain +5

New Hampshire CNN/Time Obama 51, McCain 45 Obama +6

Georgia Strategic Vision ® McCain 52, Obama 39 McCain +13

North Carolina Civitas/TelOpinion ® McCain 47, Obama 44 McCain +3

Pennsylvania Quinnipiac Obama 48, McCain 45 Obama +3

Florida Quinnipiac McCain 50, Obama 43 McCain +7

Ohio Quinnipiac McCain 44, Obama 49 Obama +5

Alabama AEA/Capital Survey McCain 55, Obama 35 McCain +20

Electoral College from realclearpolitics.com

Obama/Biden 217 157 Solid 60 Leaning McCain/Palin 216 172 Solid 44 Leaning Toss Up 105

Click for Electoral Map.

I'm moving to Idaho! LOL. Just kidding...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Article about corporate taxes

This is a great article about what I have tried to explain. Corporations do not pay taxes, people do. If you increase taxes on business it will trickle down to the consumer. That's all corporations do, they embed their tax burden into their products. So when you claim to reduce taxes on the middle class, it's true on paper but not in the economy as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good post, Wales.

I think you're right on about the VP picks. Had Obama chosen Kaine, the right would have been in an uproar and the media would be droning on and on right now about Obama's judgement and/or ability to lead.

They actually got McCain to admit on The View that he thought Roe V. Wade was a mistake. Has he said that before? I know that he's "prolife" but I don't think he's ever commented explicitly on Roe. Of course, he said he would nominate judges that would not "legislate from the bench" and no "litmus tests". Right.

Cindy looked pretty pissed at Babs for asking her exactly how many houses they have. That it's not part of the issues that need to be discussed. Really? And flag pins are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The difference between McCain's and Obama's VP pick IMO has to do with their flexibility. McCain had more flexibility in his pick because his experience has never been in question. He had the ability to choose someone that is "unknown".

I do not see how you can say Obama's pick was not political (personal) in motivation. If he had chosen Clinton he would not have been acused solely trying to get votes, because Clinton is just as qualified as Biden if not more, as Joe said. Even if he was questioned on just trying to get votes he would have Hillary's experience to answer those challenges.

I think it was personal resentment that aided in his snubbing of Clinton. So if you want to glorify Obama's pick as one that was not personal, I do not see that.

I still have yet to hear any good reason for him not picking Hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You mean giving tax breaks to oil companies who are holding orgies? Is that what you mean?

Oh........I'm not for that. :D

It sounds like the ladies on TV grilled him the way the MSM are not doing.

For once, I'm proud of them. What else did they say, and how did he react?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not always. From the same article you linked:

They may not actually pay the tax, but they are taxed. What do you think of a company that gets a tax break from the city/county/state government to build an office under the premise of hiring X people, by X time frame, making X salary and the corporation doesn't meet that agreement? Should the government entity that gave the corporations the tax break to begin with fully tax them? Or should they keep getting a tax break for jobs they were suppose to create locally but instead hired someone in India to do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy